Topic
Author
Publication year
Geography
Source
Study title
Study group
Collection year
Thematic collection
show more filters
to |
(4) |
(2) |
(6) |
to |
(3) |
(3) |
MethodologyMode of Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Temporal Research Design
Analysis Unit
Kind of Data
More filtersInterview language
(3) |
Analysis Unit
(6) |
(6) |
Sort by:
GESIS Search
Find information about social science research data, publications on research data as well as open access publications.
Links between contents are displayed directly in the hit list. For example, you can find matching publications to the research data found.
The results can be filtered quickly and conveniently according to the following categories:
- Research data
- Variables from questionnaires
- Instruments and tools
- Literature
- Publications on research data and survey instruments
- Open-access Publications in the Social Sciences
- Literature on "Women in Science and Research"
- Collections of the GESIS library
- General information and offers on the GESIS websites
Contact: suche@gesis.org
The GESIS Library is a special library for Empirical Social Research and Applied Computer Science. It is available to external users as a reference library in Cologne and Mannheim.
The cooperation with the Research Data Center Education at the DIPF enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of educational research. The measurement instruments documented there can be used free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
The cooperation with the Open Test Archive at the Leibniz Institute of Psychology (ZPID) enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of psychology and related disciplines. The measurement instruments documented there are protected by copyright and are made available free of charge ("Open Access") for use in research, teaching and practice under a Creative Commons license.
Germany Monitor
The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in East and West Germany. Each year, a new annual focus is set. A main survey (nationwide) and a regional in-depth survey are carried out. The latter includes pre-selected districts.Hamdorf, Sophia; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, EverhardJaeck, Tobias; Lutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2024 - 21.06.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8922 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8922 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Content: Opinion on general state responsibility for life risks such as illness or unemployment; solidarity with Germany as a whole, with East Germany, with West Germany; importance of civil liberties (freedom of religion, freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom to demonstrate, freedom of property and the right to strike); assessment of the implementation of individual civil liberties; agreement with various statements on the restriction of civil liberties (religious symbols such as the headscarf or the cross should be banned in public buildings and schools, stricter regulation of social media such as Facebook, TikTok or Telegram threatens freedom of expression, freedom of the press must have its limits where people are insulted or slandered, freedom of assembly and demonstration must have its limits where people are hindered in their everyday lives, large private housing companies should be able to be nationalized, even if this affects freedom of ownership, the right to strike must have its limits where important areas of public transport infrastructure are affected, e.g. in the rail and aviation sectors); satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; attitude towards the idea of democracy; discrimination: Importance of reducing discrimination on various grounds (migration background, gender; age, poverty, religion or belief, political attitude or outlook, East German origin); assessment of current economic situation in Germany as a whole and in place of residence, as well as own economic situation; Extremism (In the national interest, a dictatorship is the better form of government under certain circumstances, What Germany needs now is a single strong party that embodies the national community as a whole, We should have a leader who rules Germany with a strong hand for the good of all, As in nature, the strongest should always prevail in society, Those who have always lived here should have more rights than those who moved here later); ideas of a just society (open answers recoded into categories, e.g. freedom and personal rights, equality and equal opportunities in general, social justice and support, etc.); split: ideas of an unjust society (open responses recoded into categories, e.g. social inequality and wealth distribution, pensions and poverty in old age, dysfunctional migration and integration, etc.); priority of climate protection vs. economic growth; priority of freedom vs. equality; priority of freedom vs. security; preferences with regard to more or less government spending on certain areas (targeted recruitment of qualified specialists and trainees from abroad, strengthening of structurally weak regions, subsidies for the establishment of large companies, improvement of roads, improvement of railroad infrastructure, improvement of educational infrastructure (schools, kindergartens, universities), strengthening of police and law enforcement, strengthening of the Bundeswehr); politicians strive for close contact with the population (responsiveness); party identification (general and party); political interest; populism (members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, politicians talk too much and do too little, an ordinary citizen would represent my interests better than a professional politician, what is called compromise in politics is in reality just a betrayal of principles, the people, and not the politicians, should make the important political decisions, politicians only care about the interests of the rich and powerful); place of socialization after reunification (only for persons between 16 and 34 years of age): West Germany, East Germany, abroad; place of socialization before reunification (only to persons aged 35 and over): former Federal Republic or West Berlin, East Germany (GDR) or East Berlin, abroad; forms of political participation (working in a political party, taking part in an unauthorized demonstration, collecting signatures, volunteering); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, Federal Constitutional Court, political parties in general, party according to party identification, European Union, public broadcasting); political positioning (right-left); image of society: Characteristics of a good society (climate neutrality, social togetherness, equal opportunities, social justice, religious coexistence, Germany part of a united Europe, no political extremism, immigration as an opportunity, gender equality, competition and achievement are worthwhile); social trust (you can trust most people, most people don´t really care what happens to their fellow human beings, there is great cohesion in this society); status: fair share of the standard of living (deprivation); worries that social development will increasingly put them on the losing side of life (fear of losing status).
Demography: Sex; year of birth; age (categories); age (numerical); education: highest general school-leaving qualification; desired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN-generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); net equivalent income; household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey mode; survey year; data set (regional sample: sensitive); questionnaire split (4-point vs. 5-point scale for questions on democracy); typology of democratic orientation; extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Generated Index; Extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Categories; Questionnaire split (just vs. unjust society); Populism: Generated index; Populism: Generated dummy variable (no populist attitudes vs. populist attitudes); Institutional trust: Generated index; Social trust: Generated index; Age by generation;
Context variables: Settlement structural district type; BIK regions; district; region (East/West Germany); ILTIS typology (prosperity); Thünen rurality index; town size classes; weighting factors.
Topics: Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue, Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Social change
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2024 - 21.06.2024
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population aged 16 and over
Number of Units: 3999
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Multistage random sample from an ADM selection frame including landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample) in a ratio of 70:30.
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 170
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hamdorf, Sophia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.4232/1.14488
Study number: ZA8922
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Germany Monitor
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2025-02-18, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-02-18 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488 |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M. et al. (2025). Deutschland-Monitor ’24. Gesellschaftliche Und Politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: „In welcher Gesellschaft wollen wir leben?“. Verfügbar unter: https://deutschland-monitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/DeutschlandMonitor_24_Endfassung.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2024: Basis- und Zusatzstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V. - Methoden- und Feldbericht/Angaben zu den Studien.
Berlin: forsa 2024
Study group: Germany Monitor, GESIS Community Data
Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, Everhard; Jaeck, TobiasLutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 03.07.2023 - 28.07.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8802 Data file Version 1.1.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14489
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8802 Data file Version 1.1.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14489
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in E ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in E ... more
Content: Life satisfaction; affiliation to Germany as a whole, to East Germany, to West Germany, to the federal state and to the place of residence; assessment of the economic situation in Germany as a whole, in East Germany, in West Germany, in the federal state and in the place of residence as well as of one´s own economic situation; migration is necessary to meet the demand for qualified skilled workers; year since moving to the current place of residence; perceived development of the place of residence in the last 10 to 15 years; expected development of the place of residence in the next 10 to 15 years; sociality index where I live (People here help each other, you can trust the people here, people here motivate each other to achieve something, the interaction between young and old works well here, my town/municipality involves citizens in municipal planning, my town/municipality uses public funds responsibly, there is a lively club life in my place of residence, I am generally satisfied with the quality of life in my place of residence, I am generally satisfied with the quality of life in my immediate neighborhood, I would not want to live anywhere else, I have a positive view of my personal future in the place where I currently live); challenges in the place of residence (integration of people from other countries, emigration of young people, lack of skilled workers, availability of affordable housing, increasing contrast between rich and poor, indebtedness of the place of residence); greatest challenge for the place of residence (open question); characterization of the place of residence using pairs of opposites (rural - urban, traditional - cosmopolitan, wealthy - poor, central - remote, family-friendly - family-unfriendly, attractive place to live - not an attractive place to live); satisfaction with the infrastructure in the place of residence (provision of fast internet, provision of public transport, availability of childcare facilities, provision of general practitioners, availability of care services, accessibility of specialists, accessibility of cultural and leisure facilities and accessibility of shopping facilities for daily needs); regional resentment (feeling of being left behind): Politicians in Berlin are not interested in the region where I live, people in the rest of Germany do not respect how people live here in our region, politicians in Berlin have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, my region has developed worse economically than other regions in Germany, compared to other regions in Germany, the condition of public buildings in my region is very good); interest in politics; responsiveness: Politicians strive to maintain close contact with the population; populism (Members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the rulers and powerful in our society act against the interests of ordinary people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, decisions made after a debate in parliament are better than decisions made directly by the people); internal efficacy (I can understand and assess important political issues well); attitude towards the idea of democracy; satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; general party identification; party identification: party; political positioning (right-left); political participation in the last 12 months (involvement in a political party, political content shared, posted, e.g. on Facebook, in a blog, via Twitter, etc.); extremism (every democratic society has certain conflicts that involve violence), participation in a citizens´ assembly, participation in an authorized public demonstration or action, participation in an unauthorized public demonstration or action); extremism (In every democratic society there are certain conflicts that must be resolved by force, reforms do not improve living conditions, we need a revolution, the state is an instrument of oppression that must be abolished, if necessary, a dictatorship is the better form of government); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, mayor trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, mayor, Federal Constitutional Court); predominance of advantages or disadvantages of reunification for Germany and for the respondent personally; attitude towards the responsibility of the state (in general, securing income in an emergency, old-age provision/pension, ensuring health care for the sick, ensuring a decent standard of living for the unemployed, providing a job for everyone who wants to work, controlling wages and salaries, controlling prices, reducing income inequality, providing adequate and affordable housing, ensuring growth of industry); status: Fair share of living standards; worries about becoming more and more on the losing side of life due to social development; greatest strength for future development of place of residence (open-ended query); socialization before reunification; socialization after reunification; rural-urban socialization in youth.
Demography: sex; age (categories); year of birth; education: highest general school-leaving qualification; desired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN - generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; parents born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation; migration background.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey year; type data set (regional sample); district; region east/west; regions by ILTIS (prosperity); Thünen Rurality Index (Thünen-Ländlichkeitsindex); BBSR settlement structure district type; town size group; BIK regions; weighting factors; institutional trust: generated index; institutional trust executive index: generated index; regional resentment: generated index; social cohesion in place of residence, location quality of place of residence; quality of life in place of residence; sociality index: generated iIndex; extremism: generated index; state responsibility: generated index; typology of democratic orientation; populism: generated index.
Topics: Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Community, urban and rural life, Cultural and national identity, Social change, Social conditions and indicators
Date(s) of Data Collection: 03.07.2023 - 28.07.2023
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking persons aged 16 and over in private households in a total of eight districts (Duisburg, Wiesbaden, Birkenfeld district, Augsburg, Dahme-Spreewald district, Prignitz district, Salzland district and Weimar)
Number of Units: 4018
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
The participants were selected using a stratified, multi-stage random sample based on the ADM telephone sampling system.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 139
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.4232/1.14489, 10.4232/1.14318
Study number: ZA8802
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Germany Monitor
Current Version: 1.1.0, 2025-02-18, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14489
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.1.0 | 2025-02-18 Release 1.1.0 (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14489 |
| 1.0.0 | 2024-04-25 first archive edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14318 |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Lutz, L.-M., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M., Zissel, P. (2024). Deutschland-Monitor ’23. Gesellschaftliche und politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: Stadt und Land. Verfügbar unter: https://deutschland-monitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/Deutschland-Monitor23.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2023 : Zusatzstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V., Methoden- und Feldbericht / Angaben zur Studie.
Berlin: forsa 2023
Study group: GESIS Community Data, Germany Monitor
Hamdorf, Sophia; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, EverhardJaeck, Tobias; Lutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 18.04.2024 - 24.05.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8920 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14486
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8920 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14486
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Content: Opinion on general state responsibility for life risks such as illness or unemployment; solidarity with Germany as a whole, with East Germany, with West Germany; importance of civil liberties (freedom of religion, freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom to demonstrate, freedom of property and the right to strike); assessment of the implementation of individual civil liberties; agreement with various statements on the restriction of civil liberties (religious symbols such as the headscarf or the cross should be banned in public buildings and schools, stricter regulation of social media such as Facebook, TikTok or Telegram threatens freedom of expression, freedom of the press must have its limits where people are insulted or slandered, freedom of assembly and demonstration must have its limits where people are hindered in their everyday lives, large private housing companies should be able to be nationalized, even if this affects freedom of ownership, the right to strike must have its limits where important areas of public transport infrastructure are affected, e.g. in the rail and aviation sectors); satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; attitude towards the idea of democracy; discrimination: Importance of reducing discrimination on various grounds (migration background, gender; age, poverty, religion or belief, political attitude or outlook, East German origin); assessment of current economic situation in Germany as a whole and in place of residence, as well as own economic situation; Extremism (In the national interest, a dictatorship is the better form of government under certain circumstances, What Germany needs now is a single strong party that embodies the national community as a whole, We should have a leader who rules Germany with a strong hand for the good of all, As in nature, the strongest should always prevail in society, Those who have always lived here should have more rights than those who moved here later); ideas of a just society (open answers recoded into categories, e.g. freedom and personal rights, equality and equal opportunities in general, social justice and support, etc.); split: ideas of an unjust society (open responses recoded into categories, e.g. social inequality and wealth distribution, pensions and poverty in old age, dysfunctional migration and integration, etc.); priority of climate protection vs. economic growth; priority of freedom vs. equality; priority of freedom vs. security; preferences with regard to more or less government spending on certain areas (targeted recruitment of qualified specialists and trainees from abroad, strengthening of structurally weak regions, subsidies for the establishment of large companies, improvement of roads, improvement of railroad infrastructure, improvement of educational infrastructure (schools, kindergartens, universities), strengthening of police and law enforcement, strengthening of the Bundeswehr); politicians strive for close contact with the population (responsiveness); party identification (general and party); political interest; populism (members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, politicians talk too much and do too little, an ordinary citizen would represent my interests better than a professional politician, what is called compromise in politics is in reality just a betrayal of principles, the people, and not the politicians, should make the important political decisions, politicians only care about the interests of the rich and powerful); place of socialization after reunification (only for persons between 16 and 34 years of age): West Germany, East Germany, abroad; place of socialization before reunification (only to persons aged 35 and over): former Federal Republic or West Berlin, East Germany (GDR) or East Berlin, abroad; forms of political participation (working in a political party, taking part in an unauthorized demonstration, collecting signatures, volunteering); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, Federal Constitutional Court, political parties in general, party according to party identification, European Union, public broadcasting); political positioning (right-left); image of society: Characteristics of a good society (climate neutrality, social togetherness, equal opportunities, social justice, religious coexistence, Germany part of a united Europe, no political extremism, immigration as an opportunity, gender equality, competition and achievement are worthwhile); social trust (you can trust most people, most people don´t really care what happens to their fellow human beings, there is great cohesion in this society); status: fair share of the standard of living (deprivation); worries that social development will increasingly put them on the losing side of life (fear of losing status).
Demography: Sex; year of birth; age (categories); age (numerical); education: highest general school-leaving qualification; desired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN-generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); net equivalent income; household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey mode; survey year; data set (base sample); questionnaire split (4-point vs. 5-point scale for questions on democracy); typology of democratic orientation; extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Generated Index; Extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Categories; Questionnaire split (just vs. unjust society); Populism: Generated index; Populism: Generated dummy variable (no populist attitudes vs. populist attitudes); Institutional trust: Generated index; Social trust: Generated index; Age by generation;
Context variables: Settlement structure district type; BIK regions; region (East/West Germany); ILTIS typology (prosperity); Thünen rurality index; town size classes; weighting factors; selection frame (landline, mobile); type of telephone connections in the household.
Topics: Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue, Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Social change
Date(s) of Data Collection: 18.04.2024 - 24.05.2024
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population aged 16 and over
Number of Units: 3986
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Multistage random sample from an ADM selection frame including landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample) in a ratio of 70:30.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 169
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hamdorf, Sophia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.4232/1.14486
Study number: ZA8920
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Germany Monitor
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2025-02-18, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14486
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-02-18 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14486 |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M. et al. (2025). Deutschland-Monitor ’24. Gesellschaftliche Und Politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: „In welcher Gesellschaft wollen wir leben?“. Verfügbar unter: https://deutschland-monitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/DeutschlandMonitor_24_Endfassung.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2024: Basis- und Zusatzstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V. - Methoden- und Feldbericht/Angaben zu den Studien.
Berlin: forsa 2024
Study group: Germany Monitor, GESIS Community Data
Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, Everhard; Jaeck, TobiasLutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 26.05.2023 - 27.06.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8801 Data file Version 1.2.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14334
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8801 Data file Version 1.2.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14334
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in E ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in E ... more
Content: Life satisfaction; affiliation to Germany as a whole, to East Germany, to West Germany, to the federal state and to the place of residence; assessment of the economic situation in Germany as a whole, in East Germany, in West Germany, in the federal state and in the place of residence as well as of one´s own economic situation; migration is necessary to meet the demand for qualified skilled workers; year since moving to the current place of residence; perceived development of the place of residence in the last 10 to 15 years; expected development of the place of residence in the next 10 to 15 years; sociality index where I live (People here help each other, you can trust the people here, people here motivate each other to achieve something, the interaction between young and old works well here, my town/municipality involves citizens in municipal planning, my town/municipality uses public funds responsibly, there is a lively club life in my place of residence, I am generally satisfied with the quality of life in my place of residence, I am generally satisfied with the quality of life in my immediate neighborhood, I would not want to live anywhere else, I have a positive view of my personal future in the place where I currently live); challenges in the place of residence (integration of people from other countries, emigration of young people, lack of skilled workers, availability of affordable housing, increasing contrast between rich and poor, indebtedness of the place of residence); greatest challenge for the place of residence (open question); characterization of the place of residence using pairs of opposites (rural - urban, traditional - cosmopolitan, wealthy - poor, central - remote, family-friendly - family-unfriendly, attractive place to live - not an attractive place to live); satisfaction with the infrastructure in the place of residence (provision of fast internet, provision of public transport, availability of childcare facilities, provision of general practitioners, availability of care services, accessibility of specialists, accessibility of cultural and leisure facilities and accessibility of shopping facilities for daily needs); regional resentment (feeling of being left behind): Politicians in Berlin are not interested in the region where I live, people in the rest of Germany do not respect how people live here in our region, politicians in Berlin have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, my region has developed worse economically than other regions in Germany, compared to other regions in Germany, the condition of public buildings in my region is very good); interest in politics; responsiveness: Politicians strive to maintain close contact with the population; populism (Members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the rulers and powerful in our society act against the interests of ordinary people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, decisions made after a debate in parliament are better than decisions made directly by the people); internal efficacy (I can understand and assess important political issues well); attitude towards the idea of democracy; satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; general party identification; party identification: party; political positioning (right-left); political participation in the last 12 months (involvement in a political party, political content shared, posted, e.g. on Facebook, in a blog, via Twitter, etc.); extremism (every democratic society has certain conflicts that involve violence), participation in a citizens´ assembly, participation in an authorized public demonstration or action, participation in an unauthorized public demonstration or action); extremism (In every democratic society there are certain conflicts that must be resolved by force, reforms do not improve living conditions, we need a revolution, the state is an instrument of oppression that must be abolished, if necessary, a dictatorship is the better form of government); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, mayor trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, mayor, Federal Constitutional Court); predominance of advantages or disadvantages of reunification for Germany and for the respondent personally; attitude towards the responsibility of the state (in general, securing income in an emergency, old-age provision/pension, ensuring health care for the sick, ensuring a decent standard of living for the unemployed, providing a job for everyone who wants to work, controlling wages and salaries, controlling prices, reducing income inequality, providing adequate and affordable housing, ensuring growth of industry); status: Fair share of living standards; worries about becoming more and more on the losing side of life due to social development; greatest strength for future development of place of residence (open-ended query); socialization before reunification; socialization after reunification; rural-urban socialization in youth.
Demography: sex; age (categories); age (numerical); year of birth; education: highest general school-leaving qualification; desired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN-generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; parents born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation; migration background.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey year; type data set (basic sample); region east/west; regions by ILTIS (prosperity); Thünen Rurality Index (Thünen-Ländlichkeitsindex); BBSR settlement structure district type; town size group; BIK regions; selection frame (fixed network, mobile); weighting factors; institutional trust: generated index; institutional trust executive index: generated index; regional resentment: generated index; social cohesion in place of residence, location quality of place of residence; quality of life in place of residence; sociality index: generated iIndex; extremism: generated index; state responsibility: generated index; typology of democratic orientation; populism: generated index; type of telephone connections in the household.
Topics: Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Community, urban and rural life, Cultural and national identity, Social change, Social conditions and indicators
Date(s) of Data Collection: 26.05.2023 - 27.06.2023
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population aged 16 and over
Number of Units: 4001
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 143
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14334, 10.4232/1.14327, 10.4232/1.14317
Study number: ZA8801
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Germany Monitor
Current Version: 1.2.0, 2024-06-20, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14334
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.2.0 | 2024-06-20 variable eastwest corrected (East Berlin now connected to East Germany) (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14334 |
| 1.1.0 | 2024-05-15 label "age" corrected (German only) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14327 |
| 1.0.0 | 2024-04-25 first archive edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14317 |
Version changes: Changes between version 1.2.0 and it's previous version
| Date | Name | Description | Correction description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | eastwest | East Berlin was counted with West Germany | 2024-06-20 Ost-Berlin wird jetzt zu Ostdeutschland gerechnet |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Lutz, L.-M., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M., Zissel, P. (2024). Deutschland-Monitor ’23. Gesellschaftliche und Politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: Stadt und Land.
Verfügbar unter: https://deutschlandmonitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/Deutschland-Monitor23.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2023 : Basisstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V., Methoden- und Feldbericht / Angaben zur Studie.
Berlin: forsa 2023
Study group: GESIS Community Data, Germany Monitor
Linked
information:Variables (143)
information:Variables (143)
Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, Everhard; Jaeck, TobiasLutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 03.07.2023 - 28.07.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8803 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14319
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8803 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14319
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in E ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the stability and changes in political and social moods and attitudes of the population in E ... more
Content: Life satisfaction; affiliation to Germany as a whole, to East Germany, to West Germany, to the federal state and to the place of residence; assessment of the economic situation in Germany as a whole, in East Germany, in West Germany, in the federal state and in the place of residence as well as of one´s own economic situation; migration is necessary to meet the demand for qualified skilled workers; year since moving to the current place of residence; perceived development of the place of residence in the last 10 to 15 years; expected development of the place of residence in the next 10 to 15 years; sociality index where I live (People here help each other, you can trust the people here, people here motivate each other to achieve something, the interaction between young and old works well here, my town/municipality involves citizens in municipal planning, my town/municipality uses public funds responsibly, there is a lively club life in my place of residence, I am generally satisfied with the quality of life in my place of residence, I am generally satisfied with the quality of life in my immediate neighborhood, I would not want to live anywhere else, I have a positive view of my personal future in the place where I currently live); challenges in the place of residence (integration of people from other countries, emigration of young people, lack of skilled workers, availability of affordable housing, increasing contrast between rich and poor, indebtedness of the place of residence); greatest challenge for the place of residence (open ended query, text); characterization of the place of residence using pairs of opposites (rural - urban, traditional - cosmopolitan, wealthy - poor, central - remote, family-friendly - family-unfriendly, attractive place to live - not an attractive place to live); satisfaction with the infrastructure in the place of residence (provision of fast internet, provision of public transport, availability of childcare facilities, provision of general practitioners, availability of care services, accessibility of specialists, accessibility of cultural and leisure facilities and accessibility of shopping facilities for daily needs); regional resentment (feeling of being left behind): Politicians in Berlin are not interested in the region where I live, people in the rest of Germany do not respect how people live here in our region, politicians in Berlin have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, my region has developed worse economically than other regions in Germany, compared to other regions in Germany, the condition of public buildings in my region is very good); interest in politics; responsiveness: Politicians strive to maintain close contact with the population; populism (Members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the rulers and powerful in our society act against the interests of ordinary people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, decisions made after a debate in parliament are better than decisions made directly by the people); internal efficacy (I can understand and assess important political issues well); attitude towards the idea of democracy; satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; general party identification; party identification: party; political positioning (right-left); political participation in the last 12 months (involvement in a political party, political content shared, posted, e.g. on Facebook, in a blog, via Twitter, etc.); extremism (every democratic society has certain conflicts that involve violence), participation in a citizens´ assembly, participation in an authorized public demonstration or action, participation in an unauthorized public demonstration or action); extremism (In every democratic society there are certain conflicts that must be resolved by force, reforms do not improve living conditions, we need a revolution, the state is an instrument of oppression that must be abolished, if necessary, a dictatorship is the better form of government); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, mayor trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, mayor, Federal Constitutional Court); predominance of advantages or disadvantages of reunification for Germany and for the respondent personally; attitude towards the responsibility of the state (in general, securing income in an emergency, old-age provision/pension, ensuring health care for the sick, ensuring a decent standard of living for the unemployed, providing a job for everyone who wants to work, controlling wages and salaries, controlling prices, reducing income inequality, providing adequate and affordable housing, ensuring growth of industry); status: Fair share of living standards; worries about becoming more and more on the losing side of life due to social development; greatest strength for future development of place of residence (open-ended query, text); socialization before reunification; socialization after reunification; rural-urban socialization in youth.
Demography: sex; age (categories); age (numeric); year of birth; education: highest general school-leaving qualification; desired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN - generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; parents born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation; migration background.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey year; type data set (regional sample - sensitive); district; region east/west; regions by ILTIS (prosperity); Thünen Rurality Index (Thünen-Ländlichkeitsindex); BBSR settlement structure district type; town size group; BIK regions; weighting factors; institutional trust: generated index; institutional trust executive index: generated index; regional resentment: generated index; social cohesion in place of residence, location quality of place of residence; quality of life in place of residence; sociality index: generated iIndex; extremism: generated index; state responsibility: generated index; typology of democratic orientation; populism: generated index.
Topics: Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Community, urban and rural life, Cultural and national identity, Social change, Social conditions and indicators
Date(s) of Data Collection: 03.07.2023 - 28.07.2023
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking persons aged 16 and over in private households in a total of eight districts (Duisburg, Wiesbaden, Birkenfeld district, Augsburg, Dahme-Spreewald district, Prignitz district, Salzland district and Weimar)
Number of Units: 4021
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
The participants were selected using a stratified, multi-stage random sample based on the ADM telephone sampling system.
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 144
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14319
Study number: ZA8803
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-04-25, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14319
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-04-25 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14319 |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Lutz, L.-M., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M., Zissel, P. (2024). Deutschland-Monitor ’23. Gesellschaftliche und politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: Stadt und Land. Verfügbar unter: https://deutschland-monitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/Deutschland-Monitor23.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2023 : Zusatzstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V., Methoden- und Feldbericht / Angaben zur Studie.
Berlin: forsa 2023
Study group: GESIS Community Data, Germany Monitor
Hamdorf, Sophia; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, EverhardJaeck, Tobias; Lutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2024 - 21.06.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8921 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14487
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8921 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14487
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Content: Opinion on general state responsibility for life risks such as illness or unemployment; solidarity with Germany as a whole, with East Germany, with West Germany; importance of civil liberties (freedom of religion, freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom to demonstrate, freedom of property and the right to strike); assessment of the implementation of individual civil liberties; agreement with various statements on the restriction of civil liberties (religious symbols such as the headscarf or the cross should be banned in public buildings and schools, stricter regulation of social media such as Facebook, TikTok or Telegram threatens freedom of expression, freedom of the press must have its limits where people are insulted or slandered, freedom of assembly and demonstration must have its limits where people are hindered in their everyday lives, large private housing companies should be able to be nationalized, even if this affects freedom of ownership, the right to strike must have its limits where important areas of public transport infrastructure are affected, e.g. in the rail and aviation sectors); satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; attitude towards the idea of democracy; discrimination: Importance of reducing discrimination on various grounds (migration background, gender; age, poverty, religion or belief, political attitude or outlook, East German origin); assessment of current economic situation in Germany as a whole and in place of residence, as well as own economic situation; Extremism (In the national interest, a dictatorship is the better form of government under certain circumstances, What Germany needs now is a single strong party that embodies the national community as a whole, We should have a leader who rules Germany with a strong hand for the good of all, As in nature, the strongest should always prevail in society, Those who have always lived here should have more rights than those who moved here later); ideas of a just society (open answers recoded into categories, e.g. freedom and personal rights, equality and equal opportunities in general, social justice and support, etc.); split: ideas of an unjust society (open responses recoded into categories, e.g. social inequality and wealth distribution, pensions and poverty in old age, dysfunctional migration and integration, etc.); priority of climate protection vs. economic growth; priority of freedom vs. equality; priority of freedom vs. security; preferences with regard to more or less government spending on certain areas (targeted recruitment of qualified specialists and trainees from abroad, strengthening of structurally weak regions, subsidies for the establishment of large companies, improvement of roads, improvement of railroad infrastructure, improvement of educational infrastructure (schools, kindergartens, universities), strengthening of police and law enforcement, strengthening of the Bundeswehr); politicians strive for close contact with the population (responsiveness); party identification (general and party); political interest; populism (members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, politicians talk too much and do too little, an ordinary citizen would represent my interests better than a professional politician, what is called compromise in politics is in reality just a betrayal of principles, the people, and not the politicians, should make the important political decisions, politicians only care about the interests of the rich and powerful); place of socialization after reunification (only for persons between 16 and 34 years of age): West Germany, East Germany, abroad; place of socialization before reunification (only to persons aged 35 and over): former Federal Republic or West Berlin, East Germany (GDR) or East Berlin, abroad; forms of political participation (working in a political party, taking part in an unauthorized demonstration, collecting signatures, volunteering); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, Federal Constitutional Court, political parties in general, party according to party identification, European Union, public broadcasting); political positioning (right-left); image of society: Characteristics of a good society (climate neutrality, social togetherness, equal opportunities, social justice, religious coexistence, Germany part of a united Europe, no political extremism, immigration as an opportunity, gender equality, competition and achievement are worthwhile); social trust (you can trust most people, most people don´t really care what happens to their fellow human beings, there is great cohesion in this society); status: fair share of the standard of living (deprivation); worries that social development will increasingly put them on the losing side of life (fear of losing status).
Demography: Sex; year of birth; age (categories); education: highest general school-leaving qualification; aspired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN-generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); net equivalent income; household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey mode; survey year; data set (regional sample); questionnaire split (4-point vs. 5-point scale for questions on democracy); typology of democratic orientation; extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Generated Index; Extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Categories; Questionnaire split (just vs. unjust society); Populism: Generated index; Populism: Generated dummy variable (no populist attitudes vs. populist attitudes); Institutional trust: Generated index; Social trust: Generated index; Age by generation;
Context variables: Settlement structural district type; district; region (East/West Germany); ILTIS typology (prosperity); Thünen rurality index; weighting factors.
Topics: Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue, Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Social change
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2024 - 21.06.2024
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population aged 16 and over
Number of Units: 3989
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Multistage random sample from an ADM selection frame including landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample) in a ratio of 70:30.
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 165
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hamdorf, Sophia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.4232/1.14487
Study number: ZA8921
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Germany Monitor
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2025-02-18, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14487
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-02-18 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14487 |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M. et al. (2025). Deutschland-Monitor ’24. Gesellschaftliche Und Politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: „In welcher Gesellschaft wollen wir leben?“. Verfügbar unter: https://deutschland-monitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/DeutschlandMonitor_24_Endfassung.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2024: Basis- und Zusatzstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V. - Methoden- und Feldbericht/Angaben zu den Studien.
Berlin: forsa 2024
Study group: Germany Monitor, GESIS Community Data
