Research data
7,537Variables
1,374,682Instruments & Tools
556Publications
246,630GESIS Library
122,449GESIS Webpages
3,181
7,537Variables
1,374,682Instruments & Tools
556Publications
246,630GESIS Library
122,449GESIS Webpages
3,181
Topic
Author
Publication year
Geography
Source
Study title
Study group
Collection year
Thematic collection
show more filters
(1,051) |
(1,050) |
(744) |
(656) |
| more... |
(185) |
(163) |
(156) |
(137) |
(131) |
| more... |
to |
(73) |
(271) |
(245) |
(243) |
(207) |
(207) |
(185) |
(179) |
(187) |
(263) |
(232) |
(219) |
(199) |
(391) |
(487) |
(117) |
(119) |
(123) |
(167) |
(327) |
(74) |
(55) |
(158) |
(112) |
(63) |
(104) |
(65) |
(67) |
(79) |
(72) |
(86) |
(76) |
(67) |
(77) |
(80) |
(212) |
(103) |
(80) |
(80) |
(67) |
(74) |
(79) |
(50) |
(50) |
(56) |
(30) |
(40) |
(24) |
(27) |
(42) |
(38) |
(53) |
(46) |
(59) |
(43) |
(71) |
(61) |
(65) |
(31) |
(114) |
(63) |
(71) |
(32) |
(16) |
(17) |
(16) |
(13) |
(15) |
(4) |
(7) |
(6) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(3,951) |
(921) |
(889) |
(883) |
(839) |
(822) |
(816) |
(805) |
(794) |
| more... |
(7,438) |
(99) |
| more... |
(5,340) |
(114) |
| more... |
to |
(2) |
(89) |
(143) |
(174) |
(203) |
(178) |
(168) |
(157) |
(166) |
(163) |
(148) |
(154) |
(188) |
(151) |
(132) |
(154) |
(208) |
(152) |
(98) |
(98) |
(95) |
(104) |
(93) |
(127) |
(131) |
(143) |
(123) |
(83) |
(73) |
(96) |
(115) |
(112) |
(104) |
(120) |
(122) |
(255) |
(224) |
(164) |
(196) |
(169) |
(161) |
(141) |
(135) |
(160) |
(78) |
(138) |
(82) |
(66) |
(64) |
(69) |
(70) |
(49) |
(73) |
(72) |
(60) |
(84) |
(95) |
(66) |
(63) |
(71) |
(103) |
(76) |
(60) |
(45) |
(44) |
(42) |
(47) |
(42) |
(28) |
(32) |
(35) |
(19) |
(10) |
(11) |
(5) |
(77) |
(27) |
(11) |
(4) |
(10) |
(39) |
(6) |
(1) |
(5) |
(2) |
(16) |
(6) |
(3) |
(7) |
(9) |
(9) |
(26) |
(5) |
(5) |
(1) |
(6) |
(3) |
(2) |
(14) |
(35) |
(5) |
(14) |
(13) |
(14) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(39) |
(51) |
(7) |
(4) |
(14) |
(6) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(15) |
(2) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(5) |
(4) |
(10) |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(1) |
(9) |
(5) |
(9) |
(5) |
(13) |
(5) |
(2) |
(2) |
(4) |
(4) |
(4) |
(1) |
(8) |
(37) |
(26) |
(2) |
(8) |
(3) |
(3) |
(4) |
(2) |
(14) |
(1) |
(3) |
(5) |
(1) |
(6) |
(50) |
(8) |
(11) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(7) |
(5) |
(1) |
(4) |
(4) |
(1) |
(2) |
(5) |
(8) |
(2) |
(1) |
(2) |
(2) |
(4) |
(9) |
(1) |
(2) |
(18) |
(21) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(4) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(27) |
(1) |
(2) |
(2) |
(1) |
(2) |
(5) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(4) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(5) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(103) |
(535) |
| more... |
MethodologyMode of Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Temporal Research Design
Analysis Unit
Kind of Data
More filtersInterview language
(372) |
(66) |
| more... |
(1,083) |
(296) |
| more... |
(1,342) |
(211) |
(191) |
(98) |
(52) |
| more... |
Analysis Unit
(1,837) |
(34) |
(28) |
(3) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1,893) |
(249) |
(3) |
(1) |
Sort by:
GESIS Search
Find information about social science research data, publications on research data as well as open access publications.
Links between contents are displayed directly in the hit list. For example, you can find matching publications to the research data found.
The results can be filtered quickly and conveniently according to the following categories:
- Research data
- Variables from questionnaires
- Instruments and tools
- Literature
- Publications on research data and survey instruments
- Open-access Publications in the Social Sciences
- Literature on "Women in Science and Research"
- Collections of the GESIS library
- General information and offers on the GESIS websites
Contact: suche@gesis.org
The GESIS Library is a special library for Empirical Social Research and Applied Computer Science. It is available to external users as a reference library in Cologne and Mannheim.
The cooperation with the Research Data Center Education at the DIPF enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of educational research. The measurement instruments documented there can be used free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
The cooperation with the Open Test Archive at the Leibniz Institute of Psychology (ZPID) enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of psychology and related disciplines. The measurement instruments documented there are protected by copyright and are made available free of charge ("Open Access") for use in research, teaching and practice under a Creative Commons license.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 10.06.2024 - 25.09.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7960 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14450
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7960 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14450
Abstract: Political background and nomination, election campaign, political issues, democracy and representation, use of social media in election campaigns
Abstract: Political background and nomination, election campaign, political issues, democracy and representation, use of social media in election campaigns
Date(s) of Data Collection: 10.06.2024 - 25.09.2024
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Candidates from German parties that were represented in the German Bundestag or the European Parliament before the 2024 European elections
Number of Units: 200
Sampling Procedure: • Total universe/Complete enumeration;
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Data Collector: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Number of Variables: 607 + 20 offene Nennungen (CSV)
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Roßteutscher, Sigrid - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Debus, Marc - Universität Mannheim, Faas, Thorsten - Freie Universität Berlin, Schoen, Harald - Universität Mannheim
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14450
Study number: ZA7960
Contributor, Institution, Role: Weiß, Julia - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectLeader, Binder, Barbara - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectLeader, Bäuerle, Joscha - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Aulbach, Maximilian - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Aulbach, Maximilian - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - DataCurator, Bäuerle, Joscha - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - DataCurator, Binder, Barbara - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - DataCurator, Weiß, Julia - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - DataCurator
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ Wahlen bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-12-13, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14450
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-12-13 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14450 |
Study group: German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8818 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14407
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8818 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14407
Abstract: Attitudes of companies towards the Schengen Area.
Abstract: Attitudes of companies towards the Schengen Area.
Content: Topics: awareness of the Schengen area; company is located in a country that is part of the Schengen area; offices, factories, branches or subsidiaries in other countries; intensity of business activities with stakeholders and business partners located in other countries in the Schengen area; business activities with stakeholders and business partners located outside the Schengen area; sold or bought products or services requiring cross-border movement of goods or people inside the Schengen area in 2023; required frequency of business travel to other countries inside the Schengen area; main purpose of the company’s business travels to other countries inside the Schengen area; attitude towards the following statements about the Schengen area: is good for business in the own country, is one of the EU’s main achievements, has more advantages than disadvantages for the own country, has more advantages than disadvantages for own business; positive influence for the company by being located in the Schengen area: decreases costs due to the absence of internal border controls, is an important element for clients, for other reasons; influence of the location of international stakeholders on decision to do business with them: easier to do business with partners located in the Schengen area, no influence, only do business with stakeholders in own country; impact of the temporarily reintroduced border controls at the internal borders of the Schengen area during the COVID-19 pandemic on business activities in any of the following ways: took longer to receive supplies, affected commuting of employees, took longer to deliver products, increased administrative and operational costs, was difficult to access markets and business partners, decreased oversight of operations abroad, no impact; impact of temporarily reintroduced border controls at the internal borders of the Schengen area due to other reasons on business activities; most important impacts of these reintroductions on own business; estimated economic impact on own business of these temporarily reintroduced internal border controls (in percent); reaction of own business on temporarily reintroduced internal border controls by another EU member state: try to avoid border crossing points where controls are reintroduced, shift focus to partners or clients in areas where there are no border controls, no change in the way of working, business is not affected, other; experiences with visa requirements of business partners or clients based outside the Schengen area: application process is smooth and without difficulties, application process is time consuming, represents a major obstacle for own business, no experience; most useful improvement regarding the application process.
Demography: information about the company (limited to activities in the own country): number of employees, years of company activity; development of turnover in the last two years; total turnover in 2023; direct selling to final consumers.
Additionally coded was: respondent ID; country; NACE-Code; region; nation group; weighting factor.
Topics: TRADE, INDUSTRY AND MARKETS, Business/industrial management and organisation, Legislation and legal systems
Date(s) of Data Collection: 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024
Date(s) of Data Collection: 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024, total, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Belgium, 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024, Bulgaria, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Czechia, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Denmark, 07.03.2024 - 21.03.2024, Germany, 07.03.2024 - 21.03.2024, Estonia, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Ireland, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Greece, 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024, Spain, 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024, France, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Croatia, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Italy, 07.03.2024 - 20.03.2024, Cyprus, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Latvia, 07.03.2024 - 21.03.2024, Lithuania, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Luxembourg, 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024, Hungary, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Malta, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Netherlands, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Austria, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Poland, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Portugal, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Romania, 07.03.2024 - 19.03.2024, Slovenia, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Slovakia, 07.03.2024 - 22.03.2024, Finland, 07.03.2024 - 25.03.2024, Sweden
Geographic coverage: Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Germany (DE), Denmark (DK), Estonia (EE), Spain (ES), Finland (FI), France (FR), Greece (GR), Croatia (HR), Hungary (HU), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU), Latvia (LV), Malta (MT), Netherlands (NL), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Sweden (SE), Slovenia (SI), Slovakia (SK)
Universe: The FLASH EUROBAROMETER 542 survey has been held in the 27 Member states of the European Union. It covers businesses employing 1 or more people that are active in one of the following sectors (NACE codes):
B Mining and quarrying
C Manufacturing
D Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
F Construction
G Wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles
H Transportation and storage
J Information and communication
K Financial and insurance activities
M Professional, scientific and technical activities
N Administrative and support service activities
P Education
Q Human health and social work activities
Number of Units: 12868
Sampling Procedure: • Other;
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Organization/Institution
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: Ipsos European Public affairs, Brussels
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 139
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: European Commission, Brussels; Directorate General Communication, COMM.A.3 ´Media monitoring and Eurobarometer´ -
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14407
Study number: ZA8818
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-11-25, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14407
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-11-25 Archive release (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14407 |
Publications: European Commission: Flash Eurobarometer 542. Businesses´ attitudes towards the Schengen area. Conducted by Ipsos European Public Affairs at the request of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs. Survey co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM “Media monitoring and Eurobarometer” Unit). Brussels, 2024. doi:10.2837/115928
Study group: EB - Flash Eurobarometer
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2735
Other Title (type): BioVal – Biodiversity Valuing & Valuation (Project title)
Abstract: Bisher liegen kaum Untersuchungen dazu vor, inwieweit bei Konsument:innen ein Bewusstsein über den Zusammenhang von Lebensmittelproduktion/‑konsum und der Gefährdung von ... more
Abstract: Bisher liegen kaum Untersuchungen dazu vor, inwieweit bei Konsument:innen ein Bewusstsein über den Zusammenhang von Lebensmittelproduktion/‑konsum und der Gefährdung von ... more
Availability: Free access (without registration)
License: CC BY 4.0: Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de)
Subject area: [Interdisciplinary and Applied Fields of the Social Sciences]
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2022-06-13; 2022-06-27
Geographic coverage: [Germany / DE]
Universe: Internetnutzende Bevölkerung zwischen 18 und 75 Jahren
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample
Temporal Research Design: cross-section
Mode of Data Collection: Self-administered questionnaire
Primärforschende, Institution: Böhm, Uta; Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft (ZTG) an der Technischen Universität Berlin
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.7802/2735
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2735
Contributor, Institution, Role: [Schäfer, Prof. Dr. Dr. Martina; Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft (ZTG) an der Technischen Universität Berlin (Project Leader) [=] Böhm, Uta; Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft (ZTG) an der Technischen Universität Berlin (Contact Person) [=] forsa.omninet (Data Collector)]
Project funder: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung - BMBF
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2735
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2800
Abstract: Im Rahmen des Projekts BioWaWi, gefördert durch das BMBF, wurde eine Umfrage unter öffentlichen Wasserversorgern in Deutschland durchgeführt, um deren Praktiken zur Förde ... more
Abstract: Im Rahmen des Projekts BioWaWi, gefördert durch das BMBF, wurde eine Umfrage unter öffentlichen Wasserversorgern in Deutschland durchgeführt, um deren Praktiken zur Förde ... more
Availability: Free access (without registration)
License: CC BY 4.0: Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de)
Subject area: [Ecology, Environment]
Topics: water management, biodiversity, environmental management, ecology, sustainability, ecological system, conservation, survey, enterprise, eco-auditing
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2023-01; 2023-07
Geographic coverage: [Germany / DE]
Universe: Öffentliche Wasserversorger in Deutschland
Sampling Procedure: Non-probability Sample
Temporal Research Design: cross-section
Mode of Data Collection: Self-administered questionnaire:CAWI(Computer-assisted web interviewing)
Primärforschende, Institution: Lehr, Christian; Universität Potsdam, Krehl, Alice; Universität Potsdam, Digiacomo, Flavia; Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Norra, Stefan; Universität Potsdam
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.7802/2800
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2800
Contributor, Institution, Role: [Digiacomo, Flavia; Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) (Data Manager) [=] Norra, Stefan; Universität Potsdam (Project Leader) [=] Frankenbach, Julius; Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung (Data Curator) [=] Krehl, Alice; Universität Potsdam (Work Package Leader)]
Project funder: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung - BMBF
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2800
Version history:
| Version number | Changes in this version |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 (aktuelle Version) | 2025-01-28 https://doi.org/10.7802/2800 |
Publications: Lehr, C., Krehl, A., Digiacomo, F. & Norra, S. (2025). Praktiken öffentlicher Wasserversorger in Deutschland zur Förderung von Biodiversität und Ökosystemleistungen in Wasserschutzgebieten. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14767964.
Mcallister, Ian; Cameron, Sarah; Jackman, SimonSheppard, Jill; Meneguello, Rachel; Hansen, Kasper M.; Stubager, Rune; Sauger, Nicolas; Komar, Olivera; Zivkovic, Slaven; Batricevic, Nemanja; Stankov, Nemanja; Costa Lobo, Marina; Magalhães, Pedro; Aytaç, Selim Erdem; Çarkoğlu, Ali; Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin; Moral, Mert; Banducci, Susan
Date(s) of Data Collection: 11.02.2022 - 30.10.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7748 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.module6.2024-12-17
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7748 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.module6.2024-12-17
Abstract: CSES Module 6 focuses on the theme ´Representative Democracy Under Pressure´ with questions tapping citizens´ views on the functioning of the democratic system and percep ... more
Abstract: CSES Module 6 focuses on the theme ´Representative Democracy Under Pressure´ with questions tapping citizens´ views on the functioning of the democratic system and percep ... more
Content: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of research among election study teams from around the world. Participating countries include a common module of survey questions in their post-election studies. The resulting data are deposited along with voting, demographic, district and macro variables. The studies are then merged into a single, free, public dataset for use in comparative study and cross-level analysis.
The CSES project focuses on respondents´ behavior and attitudes during the time of a national election, with a particular emphasis on voting and turnout. Each CSES Module consists of a nationally-representative post-election survey and additional variables about the context of the overall country and electoral system within which the respondents find themselves. Every five years a new CSES Module is designed with a different substantive theme selected to address essential questions in electoral studies and social science.
Topics: Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Elections
Date(s) of Data Collection: 11.02.2022 - 30.10.2023
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2022 - 05.06.2022, Australia, 19.11.2022 - 04.12.2022, Brazil, 02.11.2022 - 01.02.2023, Denmark, 28.04.2022 - 26.05.2022, France, 14.10.2023 - 30.10.2023, Montenegro, 11.02.2022 - 07.03.2022, Portugal, 25.08.2023 - 04.10.2023, Türkiye
Geographic coverage: Australia (AU), Brazil (BR), Denmark (DK), France (FR), Montenegro (ME), Portugal (PT), Turkey (TR)
Universe: All persons of eligible voting age and eligible to vote in the national election
Number of Units: 12112
Sampling Procedure: • Probability;
Sampling procedures differ across countries. In most cases multistage stratified cluster sampling or stratified systematic random sampling was used.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview
• Telephone interview
• Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
• Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Individual level:
Modes of data collection differ across countries. A standardized questionnaire was administered in face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews or as fixed form self-administered questionnaire.
Country level:
Expert survey using fixed form self-administered questionnaire.
Data Collector: Survey Research Centre, Australian National University (ANU), Canberra, Australia;
Quaest, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
Epinion A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark;
Sciences Po, Centre de données socio-politiques (CDSP), CNRS, Paris, France;
DeFacto Consultancy, Podgorica, Montenegro;
GfK Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal;
Frekans Araştırma, Istanbul, Türkiye
Number of Variables: 658
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Mcallister, Ian - Australian National University, Australia, Cameron, Sarah - Griffith University, Australia, Jackman, Simon - Sydney University, Australia, Sheppard, Jill - Australian National University, Australia, Meneguello, Rachel - State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil, Hansen, Kasper M. - University of Copenhagen, Denmark, Stubager, Rune - Aarhus University, Denmark, Sauger, Nicolas - Sciences Po, Paris, France, Komar, Olivera - De Facto Consultancy & University of Montenegro, Montenegro, Zivkovic, Slaven - De Facto Consultancy, Montenegro, Batricevic, Nemanja - University of Montenegro, Montenegro, Stankov, Nemanja - University of Montenegro, Montenegro, Costa Lobo, Marina - University of Lisbon, Portugal, Magalhães, Pedro - University of Lisbon, Portugal, Aytaç, Selim Erdem - Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye, Çarkoğlu, Ali - Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye, Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin - Sabanci University, Istanbul, Türkiye, Moral, Mert - Sabanci University, Istanbul, Türkiye, Banducci, Susan - University of Exeter, United Kingdom
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.7804/cses.module6.2024-12-17
Study number: ZA7748
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-12-17, https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.module6.2024-12-17
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-12-17 First Advance Release (current version) https://doi.org/10.7804/cses.module6.2024-12-17 |
Study group: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)
Hamdorf, Sophia; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Holtmann, EverhardJaeck, Tobias; Lutz, Lynn-Malou; Pollak, Reinhard; Reiser, Marion; Sand, Matthias; Zissel, Pierre
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2024 - 21.06.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8922 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8922 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Abstract: The Germany Monitor is an annual survey with the aim of empirically surveying the development of political and social moods and attitudes of the population nationwide. Ea ... more
Content: Opinion on general state responsibility for life risks such as illness or unemployment; solidarity with Germany as a whole, with East Germany, with West Germany; importance of civil liberties (freedom of religion, freedom of opinion, freedom of the press, freedom to demonstrate, freedom of property and the right to strike); assessment of the implementation of individual civil liberties; agreement with various statements on the restriction of civil liberties (religious symbols such as the headscarf or the cross should be banned in public buildings and schools, stricter regulation of social media such as Facebook, TikTok or Telegram threatens freedom of expression, freedom of the press must have its limits where people are insulted or slandered, freedom of assembly and demonstration must have its limits where people are hindered in their everyday lives, large private housing companies should be able to be nationalized, even if this affects freedom of ownership, the right to strike must have its limits where important areas of public transport infrastructure are affected, e.g. in the rail and aviation sectors); satisfaction with democracy in Germany according to the constitution; satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Germany; attitude towards the idea of democracy; discrimination: Importance of reducing discrimination on various grounds (migration background, gender; age, poverty, religion or belief, political attitude or outlook, East German origin); assessment of current economic situation in Germany as a whole and in place of residence, as well as own economic situation; Extremism (In the national interest, a dictatorship is the better form of government under certain circumstances, What Germany needs now is a single strong party that embodies the national community as a whole, We should have a leader who rules Germany with a strong hand for the good of all, As in nature, the strongest should always prevail in society, Those who have always lived here should have more rights than those who moved here later); ideas of a just society (open answers recoded into categories, e.g. freedom and personal rights, equality and equal opportunities in general, social justice and support, etc.); split: ideas of an unjust society (open responses recoded into categories, e.g. social inequality and wealth distribution, pensions and poverty in old age, dysfunctional migration and integration, etc.); priority of climate protection vs. economic growth; priority of freedom vs. equality; priority of freedom vs. security; preferences with regard to more or less government spending on certain areas (targeted recruitment of qualified specialists and trainees from abroad, strengthening of structurally weak regions, subsidies for the establishment of large companies, improvement of roads, improvement of railroad infrastructure, improvement of educational infrastructure (schools, kindergartens, universities), strengthening of police and law enforcement, strengthening of the Bundeswehr); politicians strive for close contact with the population (responsiveness); party identification (general and party); political interest; populism (members of the German Bundestag should be exclusively committed to the will of the people, the people agree in principle on what needs to happen politically, politicians talk too much and do too little, an ordinary citizen would represent my interests better than a professional politician, what is called compromise in politics is in reality just a betrayal of principles, the people, and not the politicians, should make the important political decisions, politicians only care about the interests of the rich and powerful); place of socialization after reunification (only for persons between 16 and 34 years of age): West Germany, East Germany, abroad; place of socialization before reunification (only to persons aged 35 and over): former Federal Republic or West Berlin, East Germany (GDR) or East Berlin, abroad; forms of political participation (working in a political party, taking part in an unauthorized demonstration, collecting signatures, volunteering); trust in institutions (federal government, state government in the federal state, Federal Constitutional Court, political parties in general, party according to party identification, European Union, public broadcasting); political positioning (right-left); image of society: Characteristics of a good society (climate neutrality, social togetherness, equal opportunities, social justice, religious coexistence, Germany part of a united Europe, no political extremism, immigration as an opportunity, gender equality, competition and achievement are worthwhile); social trust (you can trust most people, most people don´t really care what happens to their fellow human beings, there is great cohesion in this society); status: fair share of the standard of living (deprivation); worries that social development will increasingly put them on the losing side of life (fear of losing status).
Demography: Sex; year of birth; age (categories); age (numerical); education: highest general school-leaving qualification; desired school-leaving qualification; employment; highest professional qualification; education: CASMIN-generated index; marital status; German nationality; born in the Federal Republic of Germany; household income (categories); net equivalent income; household size; number of children in the household; religious affiliation.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; survey mode; survey year; data set (regional sample: sensitive); questionnaire split (4-point vs. 5-point scale for questions on democracy); typology of democratic orientation; extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Generated Index; Extremism (Attitudes with an affinity for dictatorship): Categories; Questionnaire split (just vs. unjust society); Populism: Generated index; Populism: Generated dummy variable (no populist attitudes vs. populist attitudes); Institutional trust: Generated index; Social trust: Generated index; Age by generation;
Context variables: Settlement structural district type; BIK regions; district; region (East/West Germany); ILTIS typology (prosperity); Thünen rurality index; town size classes; weighting factors.
Topics: Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue, Government, political systems and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Political ideology, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Social change
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.05.2024 - 21.06.2024
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population aged 16 and over
Number of Units: 3999
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Multistage random sample from an ADM selection frame including landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample) in a ratio of 70:30.
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: forsa, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 170
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hamdorf, Sophia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Hebenstreit, Jörg - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Holtmann, Everhard - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Jaeck, Tobias - Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Lutz, Lynn-Malou - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Pollak, Reinhard - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Sand, Matthias - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Zissel, Pierre - Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung an der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.4232/1.14488
Study number: ZA8922
Contributor, Institution, Role: Bakker, Antje - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember, Kozilek, Julia - GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften - ProjectMember
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Germany Monitor
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2025-02-18, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-02-18 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14488 |
Publications: Hebenstreit, J., Holtmann, E., Jaeck, T., Pollak, R., Reiser, M., Sand, M. et al. (2025). Deutschland-Monitor ’24. Gesellschaftliche Und Politische Einstellungen. Themenschwerpunkt: „In welcher Gesellschaft wollen wir leben?“. Verfügbar unter: https://deutschland-monitor.info/fileadmin/Reports/DeutschlandMonitor_24_Endfassung.pdf, forsa: Deutschland-Monitor 2024: Basis- und Zusatzstichprobe für das Zentrum für Sozialforschung Halle e.V. - Methoden- und Feldbericht/Angaben zu den Studien.
Berlin: forsa 2024
Study group: Germany Monitor, GESIS Community Data
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2813
Abstract: This dataset entails data from two waves of data collection (December 2023 and October 2024) from an online survey with 1,091 and 1,017 valid responses respectively. The ... more
Abstract: This dataset entails data from two waves of data collection (December 2023 and October 2024) from an online survey with 1,091 and 1,017 valid responses respectively. The ... more
Availability: Embargo (maximum 2 years)
Embargo until: 2025-12-31
Availability after expiration of the embargo: Free access (without registration)
License: CC BY 4.0: Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de)
Subject area: [Political Science [=] International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy]
Topics: Georgia, online survey, confidence, foreign policy, parliamentary election, Europe, civil society, international relations
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2023-12-21; 2023-12-28, 2024-10-19; 2024-10-27
Geographic coverage: [Georgia / GE]
Universe: Population aged 18 and over in the Republic of Georgia
Sampling Procedure: Non-probability Sample - Quota Sample
Temporal Research Design: Time series
Mode of Data Collection: Self-administered questionnaire:CAWI(Computer-assisted web interviewing)
Primärforschende, Institution: Redeker, Dennis; Universität Bremen
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.7802/2813
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2813
Contributor, Institution, Role: [Kuhnke, Sebastian; Universität Bremen (Project Member) [=] Davidian, Giorgi (Project Member)]
Project funder: Akademie der Wissenschaften in Hamburg, Germany, European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No 101094228
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2813
Publications: Redeker, D., Davidian, G., & Kuhnke, S. (2024). Georgia at a geopolitical turning point? The international dimension of the backlash against the "foreign agents law". SSRN.
Hemerijck, Anton; Genschel, Philipp; Cicchi, LorenzoStolle, Dietlind; Russo, Luís; Nasr, Mohamed; Schelkle, Waltraud; Kriesi, Hanspeter; Oana, Ioana-Elena; Moise, Alexandru D.; Kovarek, Daniel; Truchlewski, Zbigniew
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2844
Other Title (type): EUI-YouGov ‘Solidarity in Europe’ (SiE)
Abstract: The SiE survey on solidarity in Europe, developed by the EUI (ERC Solid and Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies) and YouGov, is implemented yearly since 2018. Thi ... more
Abstract: The SiE survey on solidarity in Europe, developed by the EUI (ERC Solid and Robert Schumann Centre for Advanced Studies) and YouGov, is implemented yearly since 2018. Thi ... more
Availability: Free access (without registration)
License: CC BY 4.0: Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de)
Subject area: [European Union [=] European solidarity [=] Solidarity [=] public opinion [=] public support [=] survey research [=] Democracy [=] European security and defence [=] European Politics]
Topics: EU, solidarity, public opinion, public support, survey research, European security, democracy, European Policy, trust, EU policy, preference
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2018; 2024
Geographic coverage: [Romania / RO [=] Netherlands / NL [=] Italy / IT [=] Denmark / DK [=] Poland / PL [=] Finland / FI [=] Lithuania / LT [=] France / FR [=] Sweden / SE [=] Germany / DE [=] United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland / GB [=] Greece / GR [=] Hungary / HU [=] Spain / ES [=] Croatia / HR [=] Slovakia / SK [=] Bulgaria / BG]
Universe: All adults in surveyed countries.
Sampling Procedure: Mixed probability and non-probability Sample
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal (trend study)
Mode of Data Collection: Self-administered questionnaire:CAWI(Computer-assisted web interviewing)
Notes: The metadata of the study was updated on 29.05.2024. The five last-named primary researchers were added.
Primärforschende, Institution: Hemerijck, Anton; European University Institute / Department of Political and Social Sciences, Genschel, Philipp; Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Cicchi, Lorenzo; Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Stolle, Dietlind; Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and McGill University, Russo, Luís; European University Institute / Department of Political and Social Sciences, Nasr, Mohamed; EHT Zürich, Schelkle, Waltraud; European University Institute, Kriesi, Hanspeter; European University Institute / Department of Political and Social Sciences, Oana, Ioana-Elena; European University Institute / Department of Political and Social Sciences, Moise, Alexandru D.; European University Institute / Department of Political and Social Sciences, Kovarek, Daniel; European University Institute / Department of Political and Social Sciences, Truchlewski, Zbigniew; University of Amsterdam
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.7802/2844
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2844
Project funder: YouGov, ERC Solid
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2844
Version history:
| Version number | Changes in this version |
|---|---|
| 3.0.0 (aktuelle Version) | 2025-02-06 Addition of the 2024 wave. https://doi.org/10.7802/2844 |
| 2.0.0 | 2023-12-04 https://doi.org/10.7802/2647 |
| 1.0.0 | 2023-01-03 https://doi.org/10.7802/2512 |
Publications: Philipp Genschel (2022) Bellicist integration? The war in Ukraine, the European Union and core state powers, Journal of European Public Policy, 29:12, 1885-1900, Telle, Stefan; de Blok, Lisanne; de Vries, Catherine E; Cicchi, Lorenzo (2022): Elite-Mass Linkages in the Preference Formation on Differentiated Integration, Journal of Common Market Studies, volume 60, issue 6, pp. 1663 – 1683, Russo, Luís: Comparative European Politics article ‘A supranational solidaristic space? Comparative appraisal of determinants of individual support for European solidarity in the COVID-19 era’ (forthcoming), de Blok, L., & de Vries, C. E. (2022). A blessing and a curse? Examining public preferences for differentiated integration. European Union Politics, Nasr, M. (2022). Varieties of Ambiguity: How do Voters Evaluate Ambiguous Policy Statements?, Comparative Political Studies
Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality" (Konstanz). Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2740
Abstract: The Inequality Barometer is a representative online survey first conducted in Germany in 2020. It examines individual perceptions of different aspects of inequality and s ... more
Abstract: The Inequality Barometer is a representative online survey first conducted in Germany in 2020. It examines individual perceptions of different aspects of inequality and s ... more
Availability: Free access (with registration)
Subject area: [Political Science [=] Sociology [=] Economics]
Topics: inequality, perception
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2020-09-07; 2020-09-30
Geographic coverage: [Germany / DE]
Universe: Deutschsprachige Wohnbevölkerung über 18 Jahre
Sampling Procedure: Non-probability Sample - Quota Sample
Temporal Research Design: cross-section
Mode of Data Collection: Web-based interview
Primärforschende, Institution: Bellani, Luna; University of Konstanz, Bledow, Nona; University of Konstanz, Busemeyer, Marius R.; University of Konstanz, Schwerdt, Guido; University of Konstanz
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.7802/2740
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2740
Contributor, Institution, Role: [Berriochoa, Kattalina; University of Konstanz (Researcher) [=] Kapteina, Mark; University of Konstanz (Researcher) [=] Beiser-McGrath, Liam; University of Konstanz (Researcher) [=] Wöhler, Thomas; University of Konstanz (Project Manager)]
Project funder: Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG – German Research Foundation) under Germany‘s Excellence Strategy – EXC-2035/1 – 390681379
Publisher: Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality" (Konstanz)
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2740
Publications: Bellani, L., Bledow, N., Busemeyer, M. R., & Schwerdt, G. (2021). Perception of inequality and social mobility in Germany: Evidence from the inequality barometer (No. 03). Working Paper Series., Busemeyer, M. R. (2024). Who cares for the future? Exploring public attitudes towards the needs of future generations in Germany. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(3), 680-705., Eick, G. M., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2023). Migration levels and welfare support: evidence from the local level. Journal of European Public Policy, 1-33., Bellani, L., Bledow, N., Busemeyer, M., & Schwerdt, G. (2021). When everyone thinks they’re middle-class: (Mis)-Perceptions of inequality and why they matter for social policy. Policy Paper 06: Inequality Barometer – Inequality and Social Mobility. 26. May 2021., Beiser‐McGrath, L. F., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2023). Carbon inequality and support for carbon taxation. European Journal of Political Research.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 09.2022 - 09.2024
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8925 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14496
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8925 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14496
Abstract: The study on the influence of science blogs and podcasts on knowledge transfer was conducted by GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. The basic population co ... more
Abstract: The study on the influence of science blogs and podcasts on knowledge transfer was conducted by GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. The basic population co ... more
Content: Web research (variables from upstream web-based research): Medium (blog, podcast); type of institution of the blog/podcast (university, college, non-university research institution); start year of the first blog post/podcast episode.
Survey (variables from online survey): Overall concept for the production of the blog/podcast; content defined in the overall concept (e.g. thematic focus, unique selling point, objectives, etc.); alignment of the overall concept for the blog/podcast) with a cross-organizational strategy (transfer concept); discipline (humanities and social sciences, life sciences, natural sciences, engineering sciences); assignment of the blog to other sub-disciplines; subject of the respective discipline where the blog is typically located; use of search engine optimization methods (e.g. keywords for the blog). e.g. keywords) for the blog/web presence of the podcast; target group of the blog/podcast (actors of the science system, public, political actors, practitioners (e.g. teachers), economic actors, students, others); specific target groups in the public sphere; objectives of the blog/podcast (e.g. insight into research processes, research topics, increasing visibility, etc.); frequency of publication of new blog posts/new podcast episodes; size of the core team of the blog/podcast; paid working hours in blog production of the core team; type of financial resources for the blog/podcast (e.g. budget funds, third-party funds, advertising funds, donations, etc.); production partnerships (e.g. with research institutions, infrastructure facilities, etc.); creation of the blog/podcast as part of an external or internal scientific cooperation; participation channels for readers, podcasters, etc. ); production partnerships (e.g. with research institutions, infrastructure facilities); creation of the blog/podcast as part of an external or internal academic cooperation; participation channels for readers and listeners; media for information about the blog/podcast (e.g. social media, newsletters, printed matter, etc.); evaluation of the blog/podcast.
Demography: Activity at an academic institution; field of activity; academic career stage.
Performance survey (variables from performance analysis): Total number of blog posts/ podcast episodes; average number of words of blog posts or duration of podcast episodes in 2023; reach: number of page views of the blog or plays of the podcast in 2023.
Social media survey (manual): Number of followers on social media;
Social media survey (automated): Interaction rate of posts from the provider´s own accounts on social platforms; Interaction rate of posts from institutional accounts on social platforms; Network: Number of accounts that post links to the blog/podcast on social platforms; Ratings of podcasts on streaming platforms.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 09.2022 - 09.2024
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Blogs and podcasts from German state universities, colleges and research institutions
Number of Units: 268
Sampling Procedure: • Total universe/Complete enumeration;
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section, Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Media unit
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
• Automated data extraction
• Automated data extraction: API query
• Automated data extraction: Web scraping
• Content coding;
Web research: Web research via website search functions and Google, manual coding
Survey: standardized online survey
Performance survey: standardized online survey
Social media survey (manual): Online-based research
Social media collection (automated): zeeschuimer for data from X and CrowdTangle for data from Facebook/Instagram;
SPOTIFY Collection (automated): Spotify API
Rating survey (manual): Online-based research
Word count survey (manual): Online-based research
Data Collector: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
Analysis System(s): Excel
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 185
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Kuhle, Birte - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Voigt, Charmaine - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Repke, Lydia - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Breuer, Johannes - GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
Publication year: 2025
DOI: 10.4232/1.14496
Study number: ZA8925
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2025-02-26, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14496
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2025-02-26 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14496 |
Publications: GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften: Wi4impact: Einfluss von Wissenschaftsblogs und -podcasts auf Wissenstransfer – Codebuch, GESIS Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften: Wi4impact: Einfluss von Wissenschaftsblogs und -podcasts auf Wissenstransfer – Methodik
Study group: GESIS Community Data
