Topic
Author
Publication year
Geography
Source
Study title
Study group
Collection year
Thematic collection
show more filters
(14) |
(3) |
| more... |
(2) |
| more... |
to |
(1) |
(4) |
(7) |
(1) |
(1) |
(14) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
(8) |
| more... |
| more... |
to |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
MethodologyMode of Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Temporal Research Design
Analysis Unit
Kind of Data
More filtersInterview language
(1) |
(2) |
Analysis Unit
(4) |
(6) |
(2) |
(1) |
Sort by:
GESIS Search
Find information about social science research data, publications on research data as well as open access publications.
Links between contents are displayed directly in the hit list. For example, you can find matching publications to the research data found.
The results can be filtered quickly and conveniently according to the following categories:
- Research data
- Variables from questionnaires
- Instruments and tools
- Literature
- Publications on research data and survey instruments
- Open-access Publications in the Social Sciences
- Literature on "Women in Science and Research"
- Collections of the GESIS library
- General information and offers on the GESIS websites
Contact: suche@gesis.org
The GESIS Library is a special library for Empirical Social Research and Applied Computer Science. It is available to external users as a reference library in Cologne and Mannheim.
The cooperation with the Research Data Center Education at the DIPF enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of educational research. The measurement instruments documented there can be used free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
The cooperation with the Open Test Archive at the Leibniz Institute of Psychology (ZPID) enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of psychology and related disciplines. The measurement instruments documented there are protected by copyright and are made available free of charge ("Open Access") for use in research, teaching and practice under a Creative Commons license.
Blom, Annelies G.; Fikel, Marina; Gonzalez Ocanto, MarisabelKrieger, Ulrich; Rettig, Tobias; SFB 884 ´Political Economy of Reforms´, Universität Mannheim
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.05.2021 - 31.05.2021
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7761 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13834
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7761 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13834
Abstract: The German Internet Panel (GIP) is an infrastructure project. The GIP serves to collect data about individual attitudes and preferences which are relevant for political a ... more
Abstract: The German Internet Panel (GIP) is an infrastructure project. The GIP serves to collect data about individual attitudes and preferences which are relevant for political a ... more
Content: The questionnaire contains numerous experimental variations in the survey instruments. For more information, see the study documentation.
Topics: Opinion on a reform of the German health care system; preferred measures for financing the health care system; preference for a general practitioner model or free choice of doctor; opinion on a reform of social security for the unemployed; conditions for receiving unemployment benefit II (Hartz IV); preferred scope of rules for the German labour market; opinion on a reform of the pension system; most and least preferred proposals for financing statutory pensions (experiment with modified question order); opinion on a reform of the education system; preferred level of spending on the education system; most important area of education on which the federal government should spend more money and area of education on which less money should be spent in particular; opinion on a reform of the tax system; demand for government measures to reduce income disparities; acceptance of tax evasion; opinion on reforms of the labour market and social systems in the member states of the euro zone; preference for more or less decision-making power of the European Union with regard to these reforms; policy areas in which the European Union should have more or less decision-making power in the future; policy area in which state services should most likely be expanded and reduced; perception of the statements of the parties CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP, Bündnis90/Die Grünen, Die Linke, AfD as vague vs. precise; opinion on trade policy: setting of import tariffs by the European Union vs. by the German government; preferred level of import tariffs for cotton shirts; highest acceptable import tariff to ensure same taxes for women and men (open); opinion on distribution of policy responsibilities between Germany and the EU; agreement to introduce a legal obligation for EU parties to include women on candidate lists for European Parliament elections; agreement to introduce a legal obligation for parties to include women on candidate lists for Bundestag elections.
Genetic engineering: General attitude towards genetically modified food; experiment on the subject of genetically modified food: Assessment of the accuracy of information regarding the safety and potential of genetically modified foods and the increased risk of cancer in rats fed with genetically modified maize; knowledge of genetically modified foods in relation to health safety and the start of production by food producers; opinion on the priority of political measures to restrict the use of genetically modified foods; moral convictions regarding genetically modified foods: personal opinion on this topic reflects own moral convictions or basic questions of right and wrong; feelings when thinking about genetically modified food (disgusted, angry, worried, sad); objective ambivalence: assessment of positive aspects and negative aspects of genetically modified food; felt ambivalence of personal attitudes towards genetically modified food: in conflict with each other, mixed, undecided; interest in further information on genetic engineering (opinion for or against the use of new genetic engineering methods, no further information).
Confirmed or unconfirmed infection with Corona virus since August 2020.
Demography: sex; age (year of birth, categorised); highest educational degree; highest professional qualification; marital status; household size; employment status; German citizenship; frequency of private internet usage; federal state.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; household ID, GIP; person ID (within household); year of recruitment (2012, 2014, 2018); interview date; current online status; assignment to experimental groups.
Questionnaire evaluation (interesting, varied, relevant, long, difficult, too personal); overall assessment of the survey; respondent made further comments on the questionnaire.
Topics: Government, political systems and organisations, International politics and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Biotechnology, SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY AND SYSTEMS
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.05.2021 - 31.05.2021
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Persons between 16 and 75 years of age who lived in private households at the time of recruitment
Number of Units: 4304
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal: Panel
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Data Collector: forsa.main, Frankfurt am Main
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 134
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Blom, Annelies G. - Universität Mannheim, Fikel, Marina - Universität Mannheim, Gonzalez Ocanto, Marisabel - Universität Mannheim, Krieger, Ulrich - Universität Mannheim, Rettig, Tobias - Universität Mannheim, - SFB 884 ´Political Economy of Reforms´, Universität Mannheim
Publication year: 2021
DOI: 10.4232/1.13834
Study number: ZA7761
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
External links: GIP University of Mannheim
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2021-12-07, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13834
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2021-12-07 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13834 |
Publications: Steinacker, G.; Schmidt, S. (2014):
German Internet Panel (GIP): Stichprobenziehung und Rekrutierung der Teilnehmer.
München: TNS Infratest Sozialforschung, Feldbericht zur Erhebung 2014, Steinacker, G.; Schmidt, S.; Schneekloth, U. (2012):
German Internet Panel (GIP): Stichprobenziehung und Rekrutierung der Teilnehmer.
München: TNS Infratest Sozialforschung, Feldbericht zur Erhebung 2012, Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting Up an Online Panel Representative of the General Population: The German Internet Panel. Field Methods, 27(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X15574494, Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S. & Krieger, U. (2016). A Comparison of Four Probability-Based Online and Mixed-Mode Panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 8-25. doi: 10.1177/0894439315574825
Study group: German Internet Panel, GESIS Community Data
Date(s) of Data Collection: 04.10.2019 - 18.12.2019
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7648 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13628
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7648 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13628
Abstract: Since 2009, the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety has conducted a representative population survey on the attitude of ... more
Abstract: Since 2009, the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety has conducted a representative population survey on the attitude of ... more
Topics: Natural landscapes, Energy and natural resources, Plants and animals, Environment and conservation, Biotechnology
Date(s) of Data Collection: 04.10.2019 - 18.12.2019
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population aged 18 and over in private households
Number of Units: 2044
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI);
Data Collector: SINUS Markt- und Sozialforschung, Heidelberg
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 446
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), Bonn
Publication year: 2020
DOI: 10.4232/1.13628
Study number: ZA7648
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2020-12-10, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13628
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2020-12-10 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13628 |
Publications: Naturbewusstsein 2019 : Methodenbericht
Herausgeber: SINUS Markt- und Sozialforschung GmbH
Study group: Consciousness of Nature, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (446)
information:Variables (446)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 26.10.2017 - 08.12.2017
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7490 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13255
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7490 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13255
Abstract: Since 2009, the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety has conducted a representative population survey on the attitude of ... more
Abstract: Since 2009, the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety has conducted a representative population survey on the attitude of ... more
Content: 1. Marine nature: Associations with the topic of marine nature; agreement with statements about marine nature reserves (fishing should not take place in marine nature reserves, voluntary arrangements with fishermen in marine nature reserves are better than government regulations, oil and gas pipelines have no place in marine nature reserves, more marine nature reserves should be established to preserve nature in the sea, no wind turbines should be located in marine nature reserves); State of knowledge about the establishment of six large nature reserves in the German North Sea and Baltic Sea; importance of such nature reserves in the North Sea and Baltic Sea; assessment of the problematic nature of various aspects for the sea (plastic waste in the sea, pollution by oil, overfishing, underwater noise, e.g. from ships or drilling in the sea, radioactive waste, fertilisers and sewage, rising sea levels, loss of animal and plant species in the sea, bycatch, fishing methods that are harmful to nature such as trawl nets, extraction of mineral resources such as sand, gravel and minerals, loss of coral reefs and other habitats in the sea); frequency of consumption of fish; interest in information about the origin and catch conditions of fish for consumption that is compatible with nature and the environment; agreement with statements on the subject of fishing (I eat little fish in order to make a personal contribution to the conservation and protection of fish stocks, I consider the labelling of fish products from nature-friendly fishing to be very important, I would like to be able to rely on the trade not offering fish products from endangered species, in order for fisheries to do more for marine nature conservation, the state should support them more financially, even if this costs tax money, in order for fisheries to do more for marine nature conservation, stricter rules and laws are needed, even if this would increase fish prices, when I eat sea fish, I make sure that it is not from endangered species); knowledge of the MSC label for sustainable fisheries; correct description of the meaning of the MSC label.
2. Biological diversity: awareness of the term biological diversity; meaning of the term biological diversity (open); convinced that biological diversity on earth is decreasing; conservation of biological diversity as a priority social task; willingness to do various things to protect biological diversity (change the brand of cosmetics or drugstore articles if their production endangers biological diversity, donate to the maintenance and conservation of a nature reserve, actively participate in a nature conservation association, use a guidebook when shopping that e.g. informs about endangered fish species, make friends and acquaintances aware of the protection of biological diversity, inform about current developments in the field of biological diversity); attitude towards biologicial diversity (Scale: personally felt responsibility for the conservation of biological diversity, demand for a reduction in the use of land for settlements, industry and transport routes, promotes well-being and quality of life, financial support for the efforts of poorer countries to conserve biological diversity by richer countries, personally felt impairment by declining biological diversity).
3. Nature and nature conservation: attitude towards nature and nature conservation in general (it makes me happy to be in nature, I don´t feel good in nature, I am annoyed by the careless way many people treat nature, nature conservation as a human duty, nature must not stand in the way of economic development, we must only use nature in such a way that this is also possible to the same extent for future generations, in times of economic crisis nature conservation must also manage with less money, contact with nature is important for children´s development).
4. Genetic engineering: importance of banning genetically modified organisms in agriculture; attitude towards genetic engineering in agriculture (scale: humans have no right to deliberately genetically modify plants and animals, demand for labelling of genetically modified food, possible effects on nature should always be investigated when plants are deliberately genetically modified, have no problems with eating genetically modified food, genetic engineering as an important component in combating world hunger).
5. Energy transition: Advocacy of the energy transition.
6. Psychological foundation of the human-nature relationship: nature conservation identity on a regional and global level. The sample was randomly divided into two groups (split-half). Half of the subjects each answered the questions of questionnaire version I (global identity) and questionnaire version II (regional identity).
7. Experiment Collective vs. personal contribution to nature conservation: The sample is randomly divided into three groups, one third each answer the questions of questionnaire version A (collective nature conservation), questionnaire version B (personal nature conservation) and questionnaire version C (neutral group): Attitudes towards the topic of plastic waste with regard to intentions (I will do without many plastic products in the future, even if it hurts, within the next four weeks I will think concretely about how I can avoid plastic in my household) and behavioural intention (willingness to support an initiative to avoid plastic in the household through one´s own cooperation and interview time in minutes for which the respondent would be available free of charge); agreement to further statements on the topic of plastic waste: by avoiding plastic waste as an individual, I can noticeably improve the state of nature; a clear majority of people in Germany think it is important to avoid plastic waste and are willing to do something about it; by avoiding plastic waste together, we can noticeably improve the state of nature; avoiding plastic waste is more of a collective task for all people in Germany than for the individual.
Demography: sex; age; nationality German; other nationality mentioned; marital status; living situation; employment status; occupation if not employed; occupational status; education: school or university degree; completed apprenticeship; religiosity; religion or denomination; household size; number of children under 18 in the household; total number of children; personal net monthly income (grouped); net household income (grouped); degree of urbanisation at the time of childhood and adolescence and currently; agreement with the statement that the questions of the questionnaire could be answered completely freely and without influence by the interviewer.
Additionally coded were: federal state; city size category (BIK 5, 7 and 10 categories); weight; interviewer assessment of the persuasiveness of the behavioural tasks (assessment of nature conservation brochures or use of plastic waste in own household); doubts about the authenticity of the behavioural tasks by the respondents.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 26.10.2017 - 08.12.2017
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking resident population in private households aged 18 and over
Number of Units: 2065
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI);
Data Collector: Ipsos Public Affairs, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 250
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN), Bonn
Publication year: 2020
DOI: 10.4232/1.13255
Study number: ZA7490
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2020-12-10, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13255
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2020-12-10 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13255 |
Publications: Ipsos Public Affairs: Naturbewusstsein 2017 : Methodenbericht.
Berlin: Ipsos Public Affairs, 2017
Study group: Consciousness of Nature, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (250)
information:Variables (250)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.06.2012 - 31.05.2013
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6794 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13596
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6794 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13596
Abstract: The data set contains variables from a manual content analysis on food safety for which three different types of documents were analysed: 1. texts from websites, 2. artic ... more
Abstract: The data set contains variables from a manual content analysis on food safety for which three different types of documents were analysed: 1. texts from websites, 2. artic ... more
Topics: Diet and nutrition, MEDIA, COMMUNICATION AND LANGUAGE, Media, POLITICS, International politics and organisations, Biotechnology, Agriculture and rural industry, Government, political systems and organisations
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.06.2012 - 31.05.2013
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.06.2012 - 31.05.2013, Publication data of online documents are partly outside the survey period, i.e. they were published before the start of the survey period; however, these documents were accessible on the respective websites during the survey period.
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE), Switzerland (CH), United Kingdom (GB), United States of America (US), , European Union
Universe: 1) Hyperlink networks are the starting point for the collection of texts from websites. The starting websites for the network survey and the parameters for the network survey were chosen to best reflect the discourse on food safety on the Internet, based on national civil society actors. A total of 37,329 (DE), 21,116 (CH), 133,599 (US) and 74,184 (GB) website URLs containing a keyword or combination of keywords related to food safety formed the population.
2) The mass media agenda represents national print media (daily newspapers/ [polit.] magazines/weekly newspapers) with the highest circulation. A total of 2,843 (15 titles, DE), 569 (9 titles, CH), 6,796 (20 titles, GB) and 3,313 (8 titles, US) print media articles containing a keyword or combination of keywords relating to food safety form the population.
3) Policy Agenda documents consist of plenary debates in national parliaments and the European Parliament and documents from the relevant committees relevant to food safety. In total, 30 (DE), 11 (CH), 97 (US), 257 (GB) and 36 (EU) sections of documents containing a keyword or combination of keywords related to food safety and in which at least one person has made a statement on food safety constitute the population.
Number of Units: 5557
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Simple random
• Total universe/Complete enumeration;
The selection of texts was initially limited to documents containing a keyword or combination of keywords related to food safety. The following search string was used:
(Lebensmittelsicherheit ODER ((Lebensmittel / Nahrung / Futter) UND (Erreger / Keim / Epidemie / Seuche / Krankheit / Gesundheits / Infiziert / Verunreinig / Kontamin / Belast / Gentechni / gefähr / Gefahr / Skandal / Hygien / Risiko / EFSA / BVL / BAG))) respectively
(Food safety OR ((food / aliment / feed) AND (germ / epidemic / scare / illness / health / infected / borne / contagious / contaminated / polluted / GM food / genetical / hazard / bioengineer / harmful / scandal / hygiene / risk / EFSA / FDA / FSA))).
The search string in the language of the country under investigation was used for both print media articles and political documents, while both search strings were used in parallel for online documents and political documents at EU level.
1) For the online documents, a random sample of 35 texts per month and country was drawn, whereby the selection of the URL/website on which a document was searched for was influenced by the network measure Indegree and thus weighted (Probability Proportional to Indegree-Sampling cf. Maier et al., 2014). URLs/websites within the web presences of organisations that were frequently linked to in the network thus had a greater probability of being considered for sampling.
2) A simple random sample of 35 articles per month and country was taken for the print media articles.
3) For the political agenda a total universe/complete enumeration was conducted.
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Media unit: Text
Mode of Data Collection: • Content coding;
Quantitative, manual content analysis
Data Collector: Team of the COAB project at the Free University of Berlin, Institute for Journalism and Communication Science, Communication Theory/ Media Effects Research Unit
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric, Text
Number of Variables: 81
Notes: Further information on the data record is contained in the codebook.
The database-dump in SIARD format is available under study number http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.5183 target=_blank>ZA5183.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Pfetsch, Barbara - Institut für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Arbeitsstelle Kommunikationstheorie/ Medienwirkungsforschung, Freie Universität Berlin, Adam, Silke - Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft, Universität Bern
Publication year: 2020
DOI: 10.4232/1.13596
Study number: ZA6794
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2020-09-01, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13596
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2020-09-01 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13596 |
Publications: Pfetsch, Barbara / Maier, Daniel / Miltner, Peter & Waldherr, Annie (2016): Challenger Networks of Food Policy on the Internet: A Comparative Study of Structures and Coalitions in Germany, the UK, the US, and Switzerland. International Journal of E-Politics, 7(1), 16–36, doi: 10.4018/IJEP.2016010102, Pfetsch, Barbara / Miltner, Peter & Maier, Daniel (2016): Old and New Dynamics of Agenda Building in a Hybrid Media System. In: G. Vowe & P. Henn (Hrsg.), Political Communication in the Online World: Theoretical Approaches and Research Designs. New York, NY / Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 45–58., Maier, Daniel / Waldherr, Annie / Miltner, Peter / Schmid-Petri, Hannah / Häussler, Thomas & Adam, Silke (2014): Stichprobenziehung aus dem Netz – Wie man themenspezifische Online-Inhalte erfassen kann. In: K. Sommer / M. Wettstein / W. Wirth, & J. Matthes (Hrsg.), Automatisierung in der Inhaltsanalyse. Köln: Herbert von Halem, 90–110.
Study group: Political agenda-building under the conditions of a hybrid media system – a comparison across countries and issues (COAB), GESIS Community Data
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.06.2012 - 31.05.2013
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5183 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5183
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5183 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5183
Abstract: The SIARD-database contains variables from a manual content analysis on food safety for which three different types of documents were analysed: 1. texts from websites, 2. ... more
Abstract: The SIARD-database contains variables from a manual content analysis on food safety for which three different types of documents were analysed: 1. texts from websites, 2. ... more
Topics: Diet and nutrition, MEDIA, COMMUNICATION AND LANGUAGE, Media, POLITICS, International politics and organisations, Biotechnology, Agriculture and rural industry, Government, political systems and organisations
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.06.2012 - 31.05.2013
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.06.2012 - 31.05.2013, Publication data of online documents are partly outside the survey period, i.e. they were published before the start of the survey period; however, these documents were accessible on the respective websites during the survey period.
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE), Switzerland (CH), United Kingdom (GB), United States of America (US), , European Union
Universe: 1) Ausgangspunkt der Erhebung der Texte von Webseiten sind Hyperlink-Netzwerke. Die Start-Webseiten für die Erhebung der Netzwerke und die Parameter für die Netzwerkerhebung wurden so gewählt, dass sie den Diskurs zum Thema Lebensmittelsicherheit im Internet, ausgehend von nationalen Akteuren der Zivilgesellschaft, möglichst gut abbilden. Insgesamt bilden 37.329 (DE), 21.116 (CH), 133.599 (US) bzw. 74.184 (GB) Webseiten-URLs, auf denen ein Suchwort bzw. eine Kombination an Suchwörtern zum Thema Lebensmittelsicherheit enthalten war, die Grundgesamtheit.
2) Die massenmediale Agenda repräsentiert nationale Printmedien (Tageszeitungen / [polit.] Magazine / Wochenzeitungen) mit der jeweils höchsten Verbreitung. Insgesamt bilden 2.843 (15 Titel, DE), 569 (9 Titel, CH), 6.796 (20 Titel, GB) bzw. 3.313 (8 Titel, US) Printmedien-Artikel, in denen ein Suchwort bzw. eine Kombination an Suchwörtern zum Thema Lebensmittelsicherheit enthalten war, die Grundgesamtheit.
3) Die Dokumente der politischen Agenda umfassen Plenardebatten in nationalen Parlamenten sowie im Europaparlament und Dokumente der jeweils für das Thema Lebensmittelsicherheit relevanten Ausschüsse. Insgesamt bilden 30 (DE), 11 (CH), 97 (US), 257 (GB) bzw. 36 (EU) Ausschnitte von Dokumenten, in denen ein Suchwort bzw. eine Kombination an Suchwörtern zum Thema Lebensmittelsicherheit enthalten war und in der mindestens eine Person eine Sprechaussage zum Thema Lebensmittelsicherheit getätigt hat, die Grundgesamtheit.
Number of Units: -
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Simple random
• Total universe/Complete enumeration;
The selection of texts was initially limited to documents containing a keyword or combination of keywords related to food safety. The following search string was used:
(Lebensmittelsicherheit ODER ((Lebensmittel / Nahrung / Futter) UND (Erreger / Keim / Epidemie / Seuche / Krankheit / Gesundheits / Infiziert / Verunreinig / Kontamin / Belast / Gentechni / gefähr / Gefahr / Skandal / Hygien / Risiko / EFSA / BVL / BAG))) respectively
(Food safety OR ((food / aliment / feed) AND (germ / epidemic / scare / illness / health / infected / borne / contagious / contaminated / polluted / GM food / genetical / hazard / bioengineer / harmful / scandal / hygiene / risk / EFSA / FDA / FSA))).
The search string in the language of the country under investigation was used for both print media articles and political documents, while both search strings were used in parallel for online documents and political documents at EU level.
1) For the online documents, a random sample of 35 texts per month and country was drawn, whereby the selection of the URL/website on which a document was searched for was influenced by the network measure Indegree and thus weighted (Probability Proportional to Indegree-Sampling cf. Maier et al., 2014). URLs/websites within the web presences of organisations that were frequently linked to in the network thus had a greater probability of being considered for sampling.
2) A simple random sample of 35 articles per month and country was taken for the print media articles.
3) For the political agenda a total universe/complete enumeration was conducted.
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Media unit: Text
Mode of Data Collection: • Content coding;
Data Collector: Team of the COAB project at the Free University of Berlin, Institute for Journalism and Communication Science, Communication Theory/ Media Effects Research Unit
Analysis System(s): SIARD
Kind of Data: Numeric, Other
Number of Variables: -
Notes: A data set in SPSS- and Stata format is available under study number http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.13596 target=_blank>ZA6794.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Pfetsch, Barbara - Institut für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Arbeitsstelle Kommunikationstheorie/ Medienwirkungsforschung, Freie Universität Berlin, Adam, Silke - Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft, Universität Bern
Publication year: 2020
DOI: 10.4232/1.5183
Study number: ZA5183
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2020-09-01, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5183
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2020-09-01 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5183 |
Publications: Pfetsch, Barbara / Maier, Daniel / Miltner, Peter & Waldherr, Annie (2016): Challenger Networks of Food Policy on the Internet: A Comparative Study of Structures and Coalitions in Germany, the UK, the US, and Switzerland. International Journal of E-Politics, 7(1), 16–36, doi: 10.4018/IJEP.2016010102, Pfetsch, Barbara / Miltner, Peter & Maier, Daniel (2016): Old and New Dynamics of Agenda Building in a Hybrid Media System. In: G. Vowe & P. Henn (Hrsg.), Political Communication in the Online World: Theoretical Approaches and Research Designs. New York, NY / Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 45–58., Maier, Daniel / Waldherr, Annie / Miltner, Peter / Schmid-Petri, Hannah / Häussler, Thomas & Adam, Silke (2014): Stichprobenziehung aus dem Netz – Wie man themenspezifische Online-Inhalte erfassen kann. In: K. Sommer / M. Wettstein / W. Wirth, & J. Matthes (Hrsg.), Automatisierung in der Inhaltsanalyse. Köln: Herbert von Halem, 90–110.
Study group: Political agenda-building under the conditions of a hybrid media system – a comparison across countries and issues (COAB), GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Publications (3)
information:Publications (3)
Papacostas, Antonis; European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit
Date(s) of Data Collection: 29.01.2010 - 25.02.2010
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5000 Data file Version 4.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11428
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5000 Data file Version 4.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11428
Other Title (type): The European Parliament, Biotechnology, and Science and Technology (Subtitle)
Abstract: The ´European Parliament´ module (QA1 to QA8) was implemented on behalf of and financed by the European Parliament.
The European Parliament. Biotechnology. Science, Res ... more
Abstract: The ´European Parliament´ module (QA1 to QA8) was implemented on behalf of and financed by the European Parliament.
The European Parliament. Biotechnology. Science, Res ... more
Topics: Religion and values, Social change, LAW, CRIME AND LEGAL SYSTEMS, Diet and nutrition, International politics and organisations, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Biotechnology
Date(s) of Data Collection: 29.01.2010 - 25.02.2010
Date(s) of Data Collection: 29.01.2010 - 16.02.2010, Belgium, 29.01.2010 - 17.02.2010, Denmark, 30.01.2010 - 16.02.2010, Germany, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Greece, 01.02.2010 - 14.02.2010, Spain, 29.01.2010 - 16.02.2010, Finland, 29.01.2010 - 16.02.2010, France, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Ireland (Republic), 29.01.2010 - 12.02.2010, Italy, 29.01.2010 - 13.02.2010, Luxembourg, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Netherlands, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Austria, 30.01.2010 - 16.02.2010, Portugal, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Sweden, 29.01.2010 - 15.02.2010, Great Britain, 29.01.2010 - 15.02.2010, Northern Ireland, 30.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Cyprus (Republic), 30.01.2010 - 12.02.2010, Czech Republic, 29.01.2010 - 15.02.2010, Estonia, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Hungary, 29.01.2010 - 16.02.2010, Latvia, 29.01.2010 - 09.02.2010, Lithuania, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Malta, 30.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Poland, 30.01.2010 - 11.02.2010, Slovakia, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Slovenia, 29.01.2010 - 07.02.2010, Bulgaria, 29.01.2010 - 10.02.2010, Romania, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Turkey, 29.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Croatia, 30.01.2010 - 14.02.2010, Iceland, 29.01.2010 - 24.02.2010, Switzerland, 02.02.2010 - 25.02.2010, Norway
Geographic coverage: Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Spain (ES), Finland (FI), France (FR), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Luxembourg (LU), Netherlands (NL), Austria (AT), Portugal (PT), Sweden (SE), Great Britain (GB-GBN), Northern Ireland (GB-NIR), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Estonia (EE), Hungary (HU), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Malta (MT), Poland (PL), Slovakia (SK), Slovenia (SI), Bulgaria (BG), Romania (RO), Turkey (TR), Croatia (HR), Iceland (IS), Switzerland (CH), Norway (NO)
Universe: Population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over.
In the two candidate countries (Croatia and Turkey) and in Switzerland, Iceland and Norway, the survey covers the national population of citizens and the population of citizens of all the European Union Member States that are residents in these countries and have a sufficient command of the national languages to answer the questionnaire.
Number of Units: 31238
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample: Proportionate Stratified Multistage Sample
Mode of Data Collection: Face-to-face interview
CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available
Data Collector: TNS Dimarso, Brussels, Belgium;
TNS BBSS, Sofia, Bulgaria;
TNS Aisa, Prague, Czech Republic;
TNS GALLUP DK, Copenhagen, Denmark;
TNS Infratest, Munich, Germany;
Emor, Tallinn, Estonia;
TNS MRBI, Dublin, Ireland;
TNS ICAP, Athens, Greece;
TNS Demoscopia, Madrid, Spain;
TNS Sofres, Montrouge, France;
TNS Infratest, Italy;
Synovate, Nicosia, Cyprus;
TNS Latvia, Riga, Latvia;
TNS GALLUP Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania;
TNS ILReS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg;
TNS Hungary, Budapest, Hungary;
MISCO, Valletta, Malta;
TNS NIPO, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Österreichisches GALLUP, Vienna, Austria;
TNS OBOP, Warsaw, Poland;
TNS EUROTESTE, Lisbon, Portugal;
TNS CSOP, Bucharest, Romania;
RM PLUS, Maribor, Slovenia;
TNS AISA SK, Bratislava, Slovakia;
TNS GALLUP Oy, Espoo, Finland;
TNS GALLUP, Stockholm, Sweden;
TNS UK, London, United Kingdom;
Puls, Zagreb, Croatia;
TNS PIAR, Istanbul, Turkey;
Isopublic, Zurich, Switzerland;
Capacent, Reykjavík, Iceland;
TNS GALLUP, Oslo, Norway;
TNS Opinion, Brussels (international co-ordination).
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Number of Variables: 551
Notes: Question module QA has been surveyed in EU27 only. Question modules QB and QC have been surveyed in EU27, in the remaining candidate countries (TR, HR) and also in the EFTA countries Iceland, Switzerland and Norway.
Eurobarometer 73.1 replicates a few questions on SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY which are also part of the cumulative dataset ´Public Understanding of Science in Europe 1989-2005´ [ZA4669].
Please notice, that data for EB 73.1 protocol variables have not (yet) been supplied to the archive, except P6 (SIZE OF COMMUNITY), P7 (REGION) and P13 (LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW). In particular the following variables are missing: P1 - DATE OF INTERVIEW, P2 - TIME OF INTERVIEW BEGINNING, P3 - DURATION OF INTERVIEW, P4 - N OF PERSONS PRESENT DURING THE INTERVIEW and P5 - RESPONDENT COOPERATION.
On behalf of the data provider the data on ´Party attachment´ (D2) are under embargo for an indefinite time. They are not considered part of the official Eurobarometer survey.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Papacostas, Antonis - European Commission, Brussels DG Communication, Public Opinion Analysis Sector, - European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit
Publication year: 2012
DOI: 10.4232/1.11428, 10.4232/1.11411, 10.4232/1.10200, 10.4232/1.10115, 10.4232/1.5000
Alternate IDs: doi:10.3886/ICPSR31483.v1
Study number: ZA5000
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
External links: Eurobarometer Data Service Website at GESIS-DAS
Current Version: 4.0.0, 2012-08-31, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11428
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 4.0.0 | 2012-08-31 Archive edition update (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11428 |
| 3.0.0 | 2012-08-09 Pre-release edition (embargo update) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11411 |
| 2.0.0 | 2010-11-30 Pre-release edition (embargo update) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10200 |
| 1.0.1 | 2010-08-06 Pre-release edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10115 |
| 1.0.0 | 2010-06-24 Pre-release edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.5000 |
Version changes: Changes between version 5.0.0 and it's previous version
Changes between version 1.0.1 and it's previous version
| Date | Name | Description | Correction description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-04-08 | P7_GR REGION II- NUTS 1 (V529) | Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR42) as well as the Ionian Islands ("Ionia Nisia" with NUTS 2 code GR22) are not covered. The documentation for NUTS 1 code 4 is not correct. The data only cover the island of Crete (NUTS 2 code GR43). This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013. | 2013-08-07 Value labels corrected |
| 2013-04-08 | P7_PT REGION I - NUTS 2 (V501) | Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the NUTS 2 REGIONS for PORTUGAL have changed. In accordance with the official EUROSTAT NUTS 2 version 2003 the region “LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO” is split up and the subregion “Lezíria do Tejo” reinstated to the “Alentejo” Region; “Médio Tejo” and “Oeste” are reinstated to the “Centro” Region. The documentation for NUTS 2 code 3 “Lisboa e Vale do Tejo” is not correct and should read “LISBOA” (NUTS2003-2010: PT17). Regions “CENTRO” and “ALENTEJO” do not change names but regional coverage (NUTS2003-2010: PT16 and PT18). The regions “NORTE” (PT11) and “ALGARVE” (PT15) remain unchanged. Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the autonomous regions AÇORES (PT20) and MADEIRA (PT30) are not covered anymore. This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013. | 2013-08-07 Value labels corrected |
| Date | Name | Description | Correction description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-08-06 | Variable label weights | 2010-08-06 |
Publications: TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 340 / Wave 73.1:
Science and Technology. Survey requested by the Research Directorate-General
and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication
(“Research and Speechwriting" Unit). Brussels, April 2010., George Gaskell et.al:
Europeans and biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change?
A report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research.
Brussels, October 2010. , TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 341 / Wave 73.1:
Biotechnology. Survey requested by the Research Directorate-General and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (“Research and Speechwriting" Unit). Brussels, October 2010. , European Commission, Directorate General for Research: Qualitative study on the image of science and research policy of the European Union. Study conducted among the citizens of 27 member states. Pan-European report. Survey coordinated by Directorate General for Communication. Brussels, October 2008.
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/quali/ql_science_en.pdf
Study group: EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
Date(s) of Data Collection: 07.03.2008 - 07.07.2008
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4816 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4816
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4816 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4816
Abstract: Attitudes towards animal cloning.
Abstract: Attitudes towards animal cloning.
Content: Topics: awareness of the term ´animal cloning´; knowledge test on animal cloning: cloned animals are an identical copy of the source animals, animal cloning involves genetic modification; attitude towards the following statements on animal cloning: is morally wrong, might lead to human cloning, causes unnecessary pain, long term effects on nature are unknown, decreases genetic diversity within livestock populations; justification of animal cloning with regard to selected purposes: improve disease robustness, preserve rare animal breeds, food production; attitude towards the following statements on cloning animals for food production purposes: necessary to apply for the benefit of European food industry, unknown long-term health and safety effects, morally not acceptable, lowers cost for consumers, ethically unacceptable; most important benefits to justify animal cloning for food production; most trustworthy sources of information on the use of cloned animals for human consumption; likeliness to buy food products from cloned animals if rated safe; likeliness to buy food products from animals where one parent was a clone; importance of labelling food products from offspring of cloned animals; assessment of benefit from cloning for food production for: consumers, farmers, food industry.
Demography: sex; age; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community.
Additionally coded was: respondent ID; country; interviewer ID; language of the interview; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; type of phone line; region; weighting factor.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 07.03.2008 - 07.07.2008
Geographic coverage: Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Spain (ES), Greece (GR), France (FR), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Luxembourg (LU), Netherlands (NL), Austria (AT), Portugal (PT), Finland (FI), Sweden (SE), United Kingdom (GB), Czech Republic (CZ), Estonia (EE), Cyprus (CY), Lithuania (LT), Latvia (LV), Hungary (HU), Malta (MT), Poland (PL), Slovenia (SI), Slovakia (SK), Bulgaria (BG), Romania (RO)
Universe: Population aged 15 years and above
Number of Units: 25607
Sampling Procedure: • Probability;
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview
• Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Telephone interviews were conducted in each country with the exception of Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary Poland, Romania, and Slovakia where both telephone and face-to-face interviews were conducted (70% webCATI and 30% F2F interviews).
Data Collector: GALLUP EUROPE, Brussels, Belgium;
FOCUS AGENCY, Prague, Czech Republic;
HERMELIN, Copenhagen, Denmark;
IFAK, Taunusstein, Germany;
SAAR POLL, Tallinn, Estonia;
METRON ANALYSIS, Athens, Greece;
GALLUP SPAIN, Spain;
EFFICIENCE3, Reims, France;
GALLUP UK, London, United Kingdom;
CYMAR, Nikosia, Cyprus;
DEMOSKOPEA, Rome, Italy;
LATVIAN FACTS, Latvia;
BALTIC SURVEY, Vilnius, Lithuania;
GALLUP EUROPE, Luxembourg, Luxembourg;
GALLUP HUNGARY, Budapest, Hungary;
MISCO, Valletta, Malta;
TELDER, Al Leusten, Netherlands;
SPECTRA, Linz, Austria;
GALLUP POLAND, Warsaw, Poland;
CONSULMARK, Lisbon, Portugal;
VALICON, Ljubljana, Slovenia;
FOCUS AGENCY, Bratislava, Slovakia;
HERMELIN, Norrköping, Sweden;
HERMELIN, Pori, Finland
VITOSHA, Sofia, Bulgaria;
GALLUP ROMANIA, Bucharest, Romania
The Gallup Organisation, Brussels (international co-ordination)
Analysis System(s): SPSS
Number of Variables: 68
Notes: Je Land wurden ca.1000 Interviews durchgeführt, außer in Zypern und Malta mit je ca. 500.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Papacostas, Antonis - European Commission, Brussels DG Communication Public Opinion Analysis Sector
Publication year: 2008
DOI: 10.4232/1.4816
Study number: ZA4816
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2010-04-13, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4816
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2010-04-13 Version number created automatically (implementation of a uniform versioning policy) (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4816 |
Publications: European Commission; The Gallup Organization:
European`s attitudes towards animal cloning. Analytic Report.
Brussels: European Commission October 2008
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_238_en.pdf
Study group: EB - Flash Eurobarometer, Flash Eurobarometer - Natural environment issues (resources, biodiversity, etc.)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 05.11.2005 - 07.12.2005
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4415 Data file Version 1.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10971
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4415 Data file Version 1.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10971
Other Title (type): Foreign Languages, Biotechnology, Organized Crime, and Health Items (Subtitle)
Abstract: Foreign language learning. Modern biotechnology and genetic engineering. Crime. Health consciousness, nutrition, physical activity, and sport. Only in BG, RO, HR, TR, and ... more
Abstract: Foreign language learning. Modern biotechnology and genetic engineering. Crime. Health consciousness, nutrition, physical activity, and sport. Only in BG, RO, HR, TR, and ... more
Topics: Crime and law enforcement, Diet and nutrition, Specific diseases, disorders and medical conditions, Language and linguistics, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Biotechnology, General health and well-being, Drug abuse, alcohol and smoking, Public health
Date(s) of Data Collection: 05.11.2005 - 07.12.2005
Date(s) of Data Collection: 08.11.2005 - 05.12.2005, France, 08.11.2005 - 06.12.2005, Belgium, 12.11.2005 - 05.12.2005, Netherlands, 08.11.2005 - 29.11.2005, Germany, 07.11.2005 - 05.12.2005, Italy, 07.11.2005 - 06.12.2005, Luxembourg, 08.11.2005 - 07.12.2005, Denmark, 09.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Ireland (Republic), 05.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, United Kingdom, 09.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Greece, 05.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Spain, 22.11.2005 - 06.12.2005, Portugal, 08.11.2005 - 07.12.2005, Finland, 08.11.2005 - 29.11.2005, Sweden, 10.11.2005 - 02.12.2005, Austria, 11.11.2005 - 05.12.2005, Cyprus (Republic), 11.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Czech Republic, 11.11.2005 - 06.12.2005, Estonia, 11.11.2005 - 28.11.2005, Hungary, 08.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Latvia, 13.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Lithuania, 08.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Malta, 10.11.2005 - 06.12.2005, Poland, 11.11.2005 - 29.11.2005, Slovakia, 11.11.2005 - 06.12.2005, Slovenia, 07.11.2005 - 21.11.2005, Bulgaria, 12.11.2005 - 04.12.2005, Romania, 07.11.2005 - 05.12.2005, Turkey, 08.11.2005 - 05.12.2005, Croatia, 09.11.2005 - 26.11.2005, Turkish Cypriot Community
Geographic coverage: France (FR), Belgium (BE), Netherlands (NL), Germany (DE), Italy (IT), Luxembourg (LU), Denmark (DK), Ireland (IE), United Kingdom (GB), Greece (GR), Spain (ES), Portugal (PT), Finland (FI), Sweden (SE), Austria (AT), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Estonia (EE), Hungary (HU), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Malta (MT), Poland (PL), Slovakia (SK), Slovenia (SI), Bulgaria (BG), Romania (RO), Turkey (TR), Croatia (HR)
Universe: Population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States, resident in each of the Member States and aged 15 years and over.
In the two acceding countries (Bulgaria and Romania) and in the two candidate countries (Croatia and Turkey), the survey covers the national population of citizens of the respective nationalities and the population of citizens of all the European Union Member States that are residents in those countries and have a sufficient command of one of the respective national language(s) to answer the questionnaire.
Number of Units: 29193
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample: Proportionate Stratified Multistage Sample
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview
• Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI);
CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interview) was used in those countries where this technique was available
Data Collector: TNS Dimarso, Brussels, Belgium
TNS Aisa, Prague, Czech Republic
TNS GALLUP DK, Copenhagen, Denmark
TNS Infratest, Munich, Germany
Emor, Tallinn, Estonia
TNS ICAP, Athens, Greece
TNS Demoscopia, Madrid, Spain
TNS Sofres, Montrouge, France
TNS MRBI, Dublin, Ireland
TNS Abacus, Milano, Italy
Synovate, Nicosia, Rep. of Cyprus
TNS Latvia, Riga, Latvia
TNS GALLUP Lithuania, Vilnius, Lithuania
TNS ILReS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
TNS Hungary, Budapest, Hungary
MISCO, Valletta, Malta
TNS NIPO, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Österreichisches GALLUP, Vienna, Austria
TNS OBOP, Warsaw, Poland
TNS EUROTESTE, Lissabon, Portugal
RM PLUS, Maribor, Slovenia
TNS AISA SK, Bratislava, Slovakia
TNS GALLUP Oy, Espoo, Finland
TNS GALLUP, Stockholm, Sweden
TNS UK, London, United Kingdom
TNS BBSS, Sofia, Bulgaria
Puls, Zagreb, Croatia
TNS CSOP, Bucharest, Romania
TNS PIAR, Istanbul, Turkey
TNS Opinion, Brussels (international co-ordination)
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Number of Variables: 1173
Notes: Including remaining candidate countries after the 2004 enlargement and the Turkish Cypriot Community (TCC).
The topical module ´Foreign languages´(QA1 to QASD5b) was not surveyed in Northern Cyprus (TCC).
The topical modules ´Science& Technology: Biotechnology´(QB1 to QB24) and ´Fight against crime and corruption´(QC1 to QC8) were not surveyed in Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Croatia, and Northern Cyprus (TCC).
The topical modules on ´Smoking habits´(QE1 to QE14), ´Aids prevention´(QF1 to QF4), and ´Medical errors´(QG1 to QG8) were only asked in Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Croatia, and Northern Cyprus (TCC). In the EU member countries these questions were surveyed in the framework of Eurobarometer 64.1 (ZA4413).
The topical module on ´Consumer rights´(QH1-QH21) was also surveyed the framework of Eurobarometer 63.5 (ZA4412), in both studies only in Poland.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - European Commission, Brussels; DG Communication Public Opinion Analysis Sector
Publication year: 2012
DOI: 10.4232/1.10971, 10.4232/1.4415
Alternate IDs: doi:10.3886/ICPSR04590.v3
Study number: ZA4415
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.1, 2012-03-30, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10971
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.1 | 2012-03-30 Archive edition update (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10971 |
| 1.0.0 | 2010-04-13 Version number created automatically (implementation of a uniform versioning policy) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4415 |
Version changes: Changes between version 1.0.1 and it's previous version
| Date | Name | Description | Correction description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-07-01 | v1123, label 7 | value label incorrect | 2011-07-01 value label corrected |
| 2011-07-01 | VERSION | dataset version id variable | 2011-07-01 variable added |
Errata in current version:
| Date | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2013-04-08 | P7_GR REGION II- NUTS 1 (V1151) | Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the Northern and Southern Aegean Islands ("Voreio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR41 and "Notio Aigaio" with NUTS 2 code GR42) as well as the Ionian Islands ("Ionia Nisia" with NUTS 2 code GR22) are not covered. The documentation for NUTS 1 code 4 is not correct. The data only cover the island of Crete (NUTS 2 code GR43). This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013. |
| 2013-04-08 | P7_PT REGION I - NUTS 2 (V1125) | Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the NUTS 2 REGIONS for PORTUGAL have changed. In accordance with the official EUROSTAT NUTS 2 version 2003 the region “LISBOA E VALE DO TEJO” is split up and the subregion “Lezíria do Tejo” reinstated to the “Alentejo” Region; “Médio Tejo” and “Oeste” are reinstated to the “Centro” Region. The documentation for NUTS 2 code 3 “Lisboa e Vale do Tejo” is not correct and should read “LISBOA” (NUTS2003-2010: PT17). Regions “CENTRO” and “ALENTEJO” do not change names but regional coverage (NUTS2003-2010: PT16 and PT18). The regions “NORTE” (PT11) and “ALGARVE” (PT15) remain unchanged. Starting with Eurobarometer 62 the autonomous regions AÇORES (PT20) and MADEIRA (PT30) are not covered anymore. This has been confirmed by TNS Opinion & Social as of March 26, 2013. |
Publications: TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 239 / Wave 64.1 & 64.3:
Attitudes of European towards tobacco. Survey requested by
Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection and coordinated
by Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission).
Brussels, January 2006., TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 240 / Wave 64.1 & 64.3:
AIDS Prevention. Survey requested by Directorate General SANCO
and coordinated by Directorate General Press and Communication
(European Commission). Brussels, January 2006., TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 241 / Wave 64.1 & 64.3:
Medical Errors. Survey requested by Directorate General SANCO
and coordinated by Directorate General Press and Communication
(European Commission). Brussels, January 2006. , TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 243 / Wave 64.3:
Europeans and their languages. Survey requested by Directorate General
for Education and Culture and coordinated by Directorate General
Press and Communication (European Commission).
Brussels, February 2006., TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 244b / Wave 64.3:
Europeans and Biotechnology in 2005: Patterns and Trends.
Survey requested by Directorate General for Research and coordinated
by Directorate General Press and Communication (European Commission).
Brussels, July 2006., TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 245 / Wave 64.3:
Opinions on organized, cross-border crime and corruption.
Survey requested by Directorate General for Education and Culture
and coordinated by Directorate General Press and Communication
(European Commission). Brussels, March 2006., TNS Opinion & Social: Special Eurobarometer 246 / Wave 64.3:
Health and Food. Survey requested by Directorate General
Health and Consumer Protection and coordinated by Directorate
General Press and Communication (European Commission).
Brussels, November 2006., Pádraig Ó’Riagáin: Measures of language proficiency in national and multinational surveys: A methodological comparison. Poster presented at the Eurobarometer Symposium at GESIS, Cologne, 10 July 2015.
http://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/events/EB-Symposium/Poster/ORiagain_Poster.pdf
Study group: EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.09.2002 - 16.10.2002
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3692 Data file Version 1.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10952
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3692 Data file Version 1.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10952
Other Title (type): Services of General Interest, New Technologies, ICT, Health, Environment, and Public Safety (Subtitle)
Abstract: This Eurobarometer survey queried respondents on standard Eurobarometer
measures, such as how satisfied they were with their present life,
whether they attempted to persu ... more
Abstract: This Eurobarometer survey queried respondents on standard Eurobarometer
measures, such as how satisfied they were with their present life,
whether they attempted to persu ... more
Topics: Religion and values, Crime and law enforcement, General health and well-being, Environment and conservation, Consumption and consumer behaviour, Biotechnology, Information technology
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.09.2002 - 16.10.2002
Date(s) of Data Collection: 02.09.2002 - 04.10.2002, Belgium, 01.09.2002 - 04.10.2002, Denmark, 01.09.2002 - 19.09.2002, Germany, 02.09.2002 - 02.10.2002, Greece, 03.09.2002 - 04.10.2002, Spain, 02.09.2002 - 24.09.2002, France, 03.09.2002 - 30.09.2002, Ireland (Republic), 05.09.2002 - 30.09.2002, Italy, 04.09.2002 - 30.09.2002, Luxembourg, 01.09.2002 - 02.10.2002, Netherlands, 03.09.2002 - 29.09.2002, Portugal, 02.09.2002 - 04.10.2002, Great Britain, 04.09.2002 - 23.09.2002, Northern Ireland, 03.09.2002 - 25.09.2002, Austria, 01.09.2002 - 07.10.2002, Sweden, 02.09.2002 - 01.10.2002, Finland, 01.09.2002 - 16.10.2002, Norway
Geographic coverage: Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Spain (ES), France (FR), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Luxembourg (LU), Netherlands (NL), Portugal (PT), Great Britain (GB-GBN), Northern Ireland (GB-NIR), Austria (AT), Sweden (SE), Finland (FI), Norway (NO)
Universe: All respondents were aged 15 and over.
Number of Units: 16040
Sampling Procedure: A multi-stage sampling design was used for this Eurobarometer. In the
first stage, primary sampling units (PSU) were selected from each of
the administrative regions in every country (i.e., Statistical Office
of the European Community, EUROSTAT regions). PSU selection was
systematic with probability proportional to population size, from
sampling frames stratified by the degree of urbanization. In the next
stage, a cluster of addresses was selected from each sampled PSU.
Addresses were chosen systematically using standard random route
procedures, beginning with an initial address selected at random. In
each household, a respondent was selected, by a random procedure. Up to
three recalls were made to obtain an interview with the selected
respondent. No more than one interview was conducted in each household.
Separate samples were drawn for Northern Ireland and East-Germany.
Mode of Data Collection: Face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaire
Data Collector: INRA BELGIUM, Brüssel;
GfK Danmark, Frederiksberg;
INRA DEUTSCHLAND, Mölln;
MARKET ANALYSIS, Athen;
INRA ESPANA, Madrid;
CSA-TMO, Paris;
LANSDOWNE Market Research, Dublin;
INRA Demoskopea, Rom;
ILReS, Luxemburg;
INTOMART, Hilversum, Niederlande;
SPECTRA, Linz, Österreich;
METRIS, Lissabon;
MDC MARKETING RESEARCH Ltd, Espoo, Finnland;
GfK SVERIGE, Lund, Schweden;
MARTIN HAMBLIN LTD, London;
ULSTER MARKETING SURVEYS, Northern Ireland;
European Opinion Research Group (EORG),
Brüssel (internationale Kooperation, Consortium made out of INRA and GfK Worldwide)
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Number of Variables: 790
Notes: The regular sample size (in the sense of completed interviews) is 1000
respondents per country, except the United Kingdom with separate
samples for Great Britain (1000) and Northern Ireland (300), Luxembourg
(600) and Germany with separate samples for the Eastern and the Western
part (1000 each). Effective number of realised interviews in this
round: France 1004, Belgium 1074, Netherlands 998, Germany-West 1036,
Germany-East 1009, Italy 992, Luxembourg 599, Denmark 1000, Ireland
999, Great Britain 1014, Northern Ireland 306, Greece 1001, Spain 1000,
Portugal 1000, Finland 1000, Sweden 1000, Austria 1008, Norway 1001.
No standard trend questions.
Swiss data on the module ´Biotechnology´ are available in the framework of EBCH 2002 (online access to integrated datasets EU+Switzerland via FORS online data catalogue).
Candidate Countries data on the module ´Services of general interest´ are available in the context of Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2003.3 (ZA3984).
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - European Commission, Brussels DG Press and Communication Opinion Polls
Publication year: 2012
DOI: 10.4232/1.10952, 10.4232/1.3692
Alternate IDs: doi:10.3886/ICPSR03661.v2
Study number: ZA3692
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.1, 2012-03-30, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10952
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.1 | 2012-03-30 Archive edition update (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10952 |
| 1.0.0 | 2010-04-13 Version number created automatically (implementation of a uniform versioning policy) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.3692 |
Version changes: Changes between version 1.0.1 and it's previous version
| Date | Name | Description | Correction description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-07-01 | VERSION | dataset version id variable | 2011-07-01 variable added |
| 2011-07-01 | ISOCNTRY | alphanumeric country id variable | 2011-07-01 variable added |
Errata in current version:
| Date | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-04-21 | v764: P7 REGION I - SWEDEN | Variable documentation error: REGION I for SWEDEN does not represent NUTS 2 level, but is based on six historical provinces and large city areas. |
Study group: EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
European Commission, Brussels DG Education and Culture Citizen`s Centre - Analysis of Public Opinion
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.11.1999 - 30.12.1999
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3205 Data file Version 2.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11377
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3205 Data file Version 2.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11377
Other Title (type): Modern Biotechnology, Quality of Life, and Consumers Access to Justice (Subtitle)
Abstract: The major topics are:
1. science and technology
2. quality of life
3. information technologies
4. logos/symbols
5. consumer protection.
Topics:
1. science and technology: ... more
Abstract: The major topics are:
1. science and technology
2. quality of life
3. information technologies
4. logos/symbols
5. consumer protection.
Topics:
1. science and technology: ... more
Topics: Life-long/continuing education, Social conditions and indicators, LAW, CRIME AND LEGAL SYSTEMS, TRADE, INDUSTRY AND MARKETS, Consumption and consumer behaviour, Economic conditions and indicators, Biotechnology
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.11.1999 - 30.12.1999
Date(s) of Data Collection: 08.11.1999 - 29.11.1999, Belgium, 17.11.1999 - 15.12.1999, Denmark, 04.11.1999 - 25.11.1999, Germany, 08.11.1999 - 29.11.1999, Greece, 10.11.1999 - 29.11.1999, Spain, 13.11.1999 - 26.11.1999, France, 08.11.1999 - 29.11.1999, Ireland (Republic), 08.11.1999 - 26.11.1999, Italy, 03.11.1999 - 11.12.1999, Luxembourg, 12.11.1999 - 09.12.1999, Netherlands, 24.11.1999 - 30.12.1999, Norway, 12.11.1999 - 02.12.1999, Portugal, 08.11.1999 - 06.12.1999, Great Britain, 09.11.1999 - 29.11.1999, Northern Ireland, 01.11.1999 - 29.11.1999, Austria, 02.11.1999 - 12.12.1999, Sweden, 06.11.1999 - 04.12.1999, Finland
Geographic coverage: Belgium (BE), Denmark (DK), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Spain (ES), France (FR), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Luxembourg (LU), Netherlands (NL), Norway (NO), Portugal (PT), Great Britain (GB-GBN), Northern Ireland (GB-NIR), Austria (AT), Sweden (SE), Finland (FI)
Universe: Persons 15 years old and older
Number of Units: 17094
Sampling Procedure: Multi-stage stratified random sample
Mode of Data Collection: Oral survey with standardized questionnaire
Data Collector: INRA BELGIUM, Bruessel;
GfK DANMARK, Frederiksberg;
INRA DEUTSCHLAND, Moelln;
KEME, Athen;
INRA ESPANA, Madrid;
CSA-TMO, Paris;
LANSDOWNE Market Research, Dublin;
ULSTER MARKETING SURVEYS, Nordirland;
PRAGMA, Rom;
ILReS, Luxemburg;
NIPO, Amsterdam;
METRIS, Lissabon;
INRA UK, London;
GfK SVERIGE, Lund, Schweden;
MDC MARKETING RESEARCH Ltd, Espoo, Finnland;
SPECTRA, Linz, OEsterreich;
INRA EUROPE, Bruessel (internationale Koordination)
AC NIELSEN NORGE AS, Bergen (parallel survey in Norway)
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Number of Variables: 741
Notes: In each country about 1000 interviews were conducted, execpt in Luxembourg (approx. 600 respondents) and in Northern Ireland (approx. 300 respondents). In Germany two separate samples of approx. 1000 respondents each were surveyed.
The 2012 update of this dataset additionally includes data für Norway (n=1012). These data were originally collected in the context of a parallel survey on behalf of the Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD). They are archived there with study number NSD0935.
No standard trend questions (except for Norway)
On the basis of Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2002.1, a set of relevant variables from Eurobarometer 50.1 has been used for the production of a harmonized dataset on “Quality of Life” issues, together with relevant variables from Eurobarometer surveys 51.0, 52.1, 54.2, 56.1 and 56.2. The harmonized dataset ´Quality of Life in the European Union and the Candidate Countries´ is made available through the GESIS ´Datorium´ service (doi:10.7802/1209).
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - European Commission, Brussels DG Education and Culture Citizen`s Centre - Analysis of Public Opinion
Publication year: 2012
DOI: 10.4232/1.11377, 10.4232/1.3205
Alternate IDs: doi:10.3886/ICPSR02893.v4
Study number: ZA3205
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
Current Version: 2.0.0, 2012-06-05, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11377
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 2.0.0 | 2012-06-05 2nd Archive Edition (including Norway) (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.11377 |
| 1.0.0 | 2010-04-13 Version number created automatically (implementation of a uniform versioning policy) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.3205 |
Version changes: Changes between version 1.0.1 and it's previous version
| Date | Name | Description | Correction description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-07-01 | VERSION | dataset version id variable | 2011-07-01 variable added |
| 2011-07-01 | ISOCNTRY | alphanumeric country id variable | 2011-07-01 variable added |
Errata in current version:
| Date | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2016-04-21 | v680: P7 REGION I - SWEDEN | Variable documentation error: REGION I for SWEDEN does not represent NUTS 2 level, but is based on six historical provinces and large city areas. |
Publications: INRA (Europe) for the European Commission, Directorate General "Research": The Europeans and Biotechnology.
Brüssel, 2000.
, INRA (EUROPE) EUROPEAN COORDINATION OFFICE S.A. FOR The Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection: Europeans and the EC-Logo.
Brüssel, 2000., INRA (Europe), European Coordination Office S.A., pour La Direction Générale Emploi et Affaires sociales Sécurité sociale et intégration sociale Recherche et analyse sur la démographie et la situation sociale: Les Europeens et la Qualite de Vie. Brussels. June 2000.
Study group: EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
