Topic
Author
Publication year
Geography
Source
Study title
Study group
Collection year
Thematic collection
show more filters
(10) |
| more... |
(2) |
| more... |
to |
(2) |
(3) |
(2) |
(2) |
(5) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(7) |
(3) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(2) |
(2) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(40) |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
(11) |
| more... |
| more... |
| more... |
to |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(2) |
(4) |
(2) |
(1) |
(3) |
(3) |
(2) |
(2) |
(2) |
(2) |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(3) |
(3) |
(5) |
(2) |
(3) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
MethodologyMode of Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Temporal Research Design
Analysis Unit
Kind of Data
More filtersInterview language
(10) |
(3) |
Analysis Unit
(13) |
(14) |
(2) |
(1) |
Sort by:
GESIS Search
Find information about social science research data, publications on research data as well as open access publications.
Links between contents are displayed directly in the hit list. For example, you can find matching publications to the research data found.
The results can be filtered quickly and conveniently according to the following categories:
- Research data
- Variables from questionnaires
- Instruments and tools
- Literature
- Publications on research data and survey instruments
- Open-access Publications in the Social Sciences
- Literature on "Women in Science and Research"
- Collections of the GESIS library
- General information and offers on the GESIS websites
Contact: suche@gesis.org
The GESIS Library is a special library for Empirical Social Research and Applied Computer Science. It is available to external users as a reference library in Cologne and Mannheim.
The cooperation with the Research Data Center Education at the DIPF enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of educational research. The measurement instruments documented there can be used free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
The cooperation with the Open Test Archive at the Leibniz Institute of Psychology (ZPID) enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of psychology and related disciplines. The measurement instruments documented there are protected by copyright and are made available free of charge ("Open Access") for use in research, teaching and practice under a Creative Commons license.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 25.01.2023 - 31.01.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7929 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14124
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7929 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14124
Abstract: The short survey on current questions on climate protection, focus: food was conducted by the opinion research institute Kantar on behalf of the Press and Information Off ... more
Abstract: The short survey on current questions on climate protection, focus: food was conducted by the opinion research institute Kantar on behalf of the Press and Information Off ... more
Content: Concerns about possible consequences of climate change; assessment of current political measures for climate protection (appropriate, go too far or do not go far enough); contribution of citizens to climate protection in various areas (choice of means of transport, nutrition, energy use, waste, purchasing behavior); agreement with various statements on the topic of nutrition (fruit and vegetables are too expensive, meat and sausage products are too expensive, it is important for climate protection that people eat less meat, politics in Germany does too little for species-appropriate animal husbandry, too few meat-free dishes are offered in restaurants and canteens, people who eat meat are currently often made to feel guilty, people who eat a meat-free diet are often ridiculed, politics interferes too much in people´s lives when it comes to nutrition); frequency of meat consumption; future personal meat consumption; frequency of buying organic food; assessment of various measures related to food (exemption from punishment for stealing food that has already been disposed of but is still edible from supermarket dumpsters, abolition of VAT on fruit and vegetables, higher taxes on meat and sausage for greater animal welfare, obligation of supermarkets to donate expired food, permission to grow genetically modified crops, promotion of animal-friendly and environmentally friendly conversions of barns for smaller farms).
Demography: sex; age; education; employment status; household size; number of persons in household 14 years and older; party preference; voting eligibility; net household income; survey by mobile or landline;
Additionally coded: Respondent ID; weighting factor; interview date; BIK locality size; political locality size; federal state; survey area west/east.
Topics: Consumption and consumer behaviour, Diet and nutrition, Environment and conservation, Political behaviour and attitudes
Date(s) of Data Collection: 25.01.2023 - 31.01.2023
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking population aged 14 and over in private households in the Federal Republic of Germany. The sample population consists of private households in the Federal Republic of Germany with at least one landline and people with at least one mobile phone.
Number of Units: 1501
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: Kantar, München
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata, CSV
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 44
Notes: The survey was commissioned by the Federal Press Office.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, Berlin
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.4232/1.14124
Study number: ZA7929
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ Wahlen bei GESIS
External links: Federal Press Office
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2023-08-02, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14124
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2023-08-02 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14124 |
Publications: Auswertungen zu Studie ZA7929 – Aktuelle Fragen zum Klimaschutz, Schwerpunkt Ernährung (Januar 2023)
Herausgeber: Kantar
Study group: Surveys commissioned by the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (44)
information:Variables (44)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 27.10.2022 - 16.01.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8913 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14447
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8913 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14447
Abstract: The Generations Study was conducted by infratest dimap on behalf of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. During the survey period from 27.10.2022 to 16.01.2023, the German pop ... more
Abstract: The Generations Study was conducted by infratest dimap on behalf of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. During the survey period from 27.10.2022 to 16.01.2023, the German pop ... more
Content: Climate-friendly consumer behaviour (avoid air travel, avoid travelling by car, pay attention to ecologically produced clothing, take care to behave in an environmentally and climate-friendly manner in everyday life); importance of various food characteristics (e.g. own and fresh preparation, balanced, healthy diet, vegetarian or vegan food, etc.); vegetarian diet; vegan diet; value orientations; perceived conflicts in various social groups (young and old, poor and rich, foreigners and Germans, urban and rural areas); interest in politics; satisfaction with democracy; political commitment; feelings of threat (e.g. due to climate change, immigration to Germany, economic crisis in Germany, tensions between Europe and Russia, tensions between Europe and China, xenophobia in Germany, etc.); Position statements on political issues (taxes and duties, immigration, climate); agreement with political statements (leadership positions in politics and business should be filled by a binding proportion of women/ people with a migration background, I can rely on my abilities in difficult situations, all in all, I think things are fair in Germany, today´s pensioners should get more pension, even if everyone has to pay more contributions); credibility of public service media such as ARD and ZDF; use of social media in general (e.g. WhatsApp, Facebook, etc.); use of these social media for political information; importance of gender-appropriate language in the media; party preference (Sunday question); alternative vote Sunday question; importance of various criteria for a satisfying job (e.g. high income, good promotion opportunities, secure job, etc.).
Demography: sex; age; age group; household size; number of persons in household under 16 years; employment; unemployment longer than 6 months; job security; religious denomination; religiosity; highest general educational qualification; aspired educational qualification; personal migration background or migration background of parents; income situation; willingness to participate in a qualitative interview.
Additionally coded were: Interview number; sample (standard, age cohorts); federal state; urban/rural districts; location size (political municipality size class; interview date; interview start time, interview duration; weighting factor; INKAR spatial unit; INKAR aggregate; INKAR: total net migration per 1000 inhabitants; inflows per 1000 inhabitants; 2017 Bundestag election: Share of votes CDU/CSU, SPD, Greens, FDP, other parties, Die Linke, and AfD; Share of settlement and transport area in percent of area, inhabitants per sq km of settlement and transport area; Hospital beds per 1000 inhabitants, doctors per 1000 inhabitants, share of inhabitants in municipality with a population density of less than 150 inhabitants per sq km; Share of population living in medium-sized centers; Share of population living in regional centers. Inhabitants per square kilometer; average car journey time to the nearest motorway junction in minutes; population-weighted linear distance to the nearest public transport stop with at least 20 departures per day; interview number qualitative interview.
Topics: Family life and marriage, Consumption and consumer behaviour, Diet and nutrition, Information society, SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND GROUPINGS, Social change, Political behaviour and attitudes, Environment and conservation
Date(s) of Data Collection: 27.10.2022 - 16.01.2023
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German population aged 16 and over in private households (German citizens)
Number of Units: 4247
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Stratified;
two samples: Sample 1: N = 1,000; Sample 2: N = 3,247 with approx. 500 interviews each in seven age groups (16-25 years, 26-35 years, 36-45 years, 46-55 years, 56-65 years, 66-75 years, 76 years and older)
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: infratest dimap, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 185
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Hirndorf, Dominik - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin, Neu, Viola - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin, Pokorny, Sabine - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin, Roose, Jochen - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14447
Study number: ZA8913
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Konrad Adenauer Foundation
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-12-11, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14447
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-12-11 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14447 |
Publications: Hirndorf, Dominik (2023): Verzichten fürs Klima? Repräsentative Umfrage zu Einstellungen im Bereich Klimaschutz und klimafreundlichem Verhalten in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V.
, Roose, Jochen (2023): Generation ist weniger als Alter. Repräsentative Umfragen zu Altersunterschieden bei Wahlverhalten, Werten, Ängsten und politischer Beteiligung. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V.
, Hirndorf, Dominik/Roose, Jochen (2023): Welchen Nachrichten kann man noch trauen? Angst vor Desinformation und Vertrauen in öffentlich-rechtliche Medien – repräsentative Umfragen Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V.
, infratest dimap: Generationenstudie 2022/23 : Eine repräsentative Bevölkerungsbefragung von infratest dimap im Auftrag der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Methodenbericht.
Berlin: infratest dimap 2023
Study group: Studies Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (185)
information:Variables (185)
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2602
Other Title (type): "Was und Wie wird in Hamburg gegessen?" (Paralleltitel)
Abstract: Anhand dieses Datensatzes kann das Ernährungsverhalten, insbesondere der Fleischkonsum und -verzicht auf individueller Ebene untersucht werden. Im Fokus der Analyse stehe ... more
Abstract: Anhand dieses Datensatzes kann das Ernährungsverhalten, insbesondere der Fleischkonsum und -verzicht auf individueller Ebene untersucht werden. Im Fokus der Analyse stehe ... more
Availability: Free access (with registration)
Subject area: Sociology
Topics: Hamburg, nutrition, sustainability, vegetarianism, computer-assisted telephone interview, media
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2018-08; 2018-12
Geographic coverage: Germany / DE
Geographic coverage (free): [Hamburg]
Universe: Volljährige Personen in Hamburg lebend (mit Festnetz)
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample - Systematic random Sample
Temporal Research Design: cross-section
Mode of Data Collection: Telephone interview:CATI(Computer Assisted Telephone Interview)
Notes: Die Angaben zu den Primärforschenden der Studie wurden am 18.07.2024 aktualisiert: Dunker, Alicia; Universität Hamburg wurde als Primärforschende hinzugefügt.
Primärforschende, Institution: Kley, Stefanie; Universität Hamburg, Dunker, Alicia; Universität Hamburg
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.7802/2602
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2602
Contributor, Institution, Role: [WiSo Forschungslabor Universität Hamburg (Datenerheber/in) [=] Dunker, Alicia; Universität Hamburg (Projektmitglied)]
Project funder: Kompetenzzentrum Nachhaltige Universität (Universität Hamburg)
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2602
Version history:
| Version number | Changes in this version |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 (aktuelle Version) | 2024-04-10 https://doi.org/10.7802/2602 |
Publications: Trübner, Miriam, Natascha Nisic, Alicia Dunker und Stefanie Kley (2022): Nachhaltiger Lebensmittelkonsum - eine Frage sozialer Differenzierung? In: Soziale Welt, 73(4): 680-712., Stefanie Kley, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw & Alicia Dunker (2023) Media Diets of Vegetarians. How News Consumption, Social Media Use and Communicating with One’s Social Environment are Associated with a Vegetarian Diet, Environmental Communication, 17:8, 875-890
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2463
Abstract: Nachhaltiger Lebensmittelkonsum stellt ein Kernelement bei der Bewältigung der Klimakrise dar; entsprechend geht mit der aktuellen Nachhaltigkeitsbewegung ein breites Ang ... more
Abstract: Nachhaltiger Lebensmittelkonsum stellt ein Kernelement bei der Bewältigung der Klimakrise dar; entsprechend geht mit der aktuellen Nachhaltigkeitsbewegung ein breites Ang ... more
Availability: Free access (without registration)
Subject area: [Sociology]
Date(s) of Data Collection: 2018-08-17; 2018-12-21
Geographic coverage: [Germany / DE]
Geographic coverage (free): [Hamburg]
Universe: Personen ab 18 Jahren aus Privathaushalten
Sampling Procedure: Probability Sample
Temporal Research Design: cross-section
Mode of Data Collection: Telephone interview
Notes: Die Studie ist im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes "Einflüsse auf nachhaltige Ernährungspraktiken" der Universtät Hamburg entstanden. Der Datensatz "food" wird erst zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt veröffentlicht, kann aber bei Interesse bei Prof. Stefanie Kley (stefanie.kley@uni-hamburg.de) angefragt werden.The study was conducted as part of the research project "Influences on Sustainable Food Practices" at the University of Hamburg. The primary data "food" is not yet available but can be retrieved from Prof. Stefanie Kley (Stefanie.Kley@uni-hamburg.de) on request.
Primärforschende, Institution: Trübner, Miriam; Universität Mainz
Publication year: 2022
DOI: 10.7802/2463
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2463
Contributor, Institution, Role: [Kley, Stefanie; Universität Hamburg (Project Leader) [=] Dunker, Alicia; Universität Hamburg (Project Manager)]
Project funder: Kompetenzzentrum Nachhaltige Universität“ an der Universität Hamburg
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2463
Reference publication: Trübner, Miriam, Natascha Nisic, Alicia Dunker und Stefanie Kley (2022): Nachhaltiger Lebensmittelkonsum - eine Frage sozialer Differenzierung? Soziale Welt, 73 (4): 680-712. DOI: 10.5771/0038-6073-2022-4-611
Journal name: Soziale Welt
Journal volume: 73
Issue number: 4
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Berlin; Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau
Date(s) of Data Collection: 11.2020 - 09.2021
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8799 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14278
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8799 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14278
Abstract: The study series “Environmental Consciousness in Germany” has been conducted every two years since 1996 on behalf of the Federal Ministry for the Environment and the Fede ... more
Abstract: The study series “Environmental Consciousness in Germany” has been conducted every two years since 1996 on behalf of the Federal Ministry for the Environment and the Fede ... more
Content: A) Main survey:
Impact of the coronavirus pandemic on personal life situation; importance of various socio-political issues (social justice, economic development, crime, public safety, wars, terrorism, environmental and climate protection, digitalization, unemployment, immigration, integration, state of the education system, state of the healthcare system, development of urban and rural areas, course and consequences of the coronavirus pandemic, data protection); areas where change is urgently needed (sufficient and affordable housing, better job opportunities and fair wages, improvement of educational opportunities, more environmental, nature and climate protection, integration of immigrants, improvement of public safety, more investment in infrastructure (such as road and rail networks, electricity and heating networks), reduction of poverty and social inequality, preventing discrimination and equal opportunities for all, strengthening healthcare and care, advancing digitalization, supply of healthy and affordable food); self-assessment of environmental awareness.
Politics and environmental quality: assessment of environmental quality in the city/municipality, in Germany and worldwide; assessment of the commitment of various actors to environmental protection (environmental associations, cities and municipalities, federal government, federal states, European Union, United Nations (UN), industry and business; citizens, science); importance of the requirements of environmental and climate protection in the following policy areas (economic policy, labor market policy, social policy, foreign policy, transport policy, agricultural policy, energy policy, tax and financial policy, urban development policy/urban and regional planning, health policy and education policy).
Environmental awareness and behavior: Agreement with various statements on the environment (it worries me when I think about the environmental conditions we are leaving behind for future generations, man-made environmental problems such as deforestation or plastic in the oceans outrage me, I am happy when people simply try out sustainable lifestyles, I am annoyed when environmentalists want to tell me how I should live, more environmental protection also means better quality of life and health for everyone, there are natural limits to growth that our industrialized world has long since reached, we should all be prepared to reduce our current standard of living for the benefit of the environment, each individual has a responsibility to ensure that we leave an environment worth living in for future generations, we must find ways to live well independently of economic growth, environmental protection is often used as an excuse to raise prices); personal behavior (frequency) when buying and using products and services (I buy food from controlled organic cultivation, when shopping I choose products with an environmental label such as the Blue Angel, the EU organic label or the EU Ecolabel, I eat meat for my main meals, I use a bicycle, public transport or walk for my everyday journeys, when buying household appliances I choose appliances with a particularly good energy efficiency rating, I heat my home in winter so that I am warm enough even in a T-shirt, I consciously limit my consumption in everyday life); active environmental protection behavior (donations to environmental or nature conservation groups, commitment to environmental and nature conservation, household purchases green electricity, avoiding air travel for climate protection reasons).
Exposure: Extent of health exposure to environmental pollution and environmental pollutants; level of perceived noise exposure from rail traffic noise, road traffic noise, air traffic noise, industrial and commercial noise and noise from the neighborhood.
Focus topic climate protection and socio-ecological transformation: Interest in the topic of climate change and climate protection; informedness about the topic of climate change and climate protection; causes of climate change; responsibility of various actors for climate protection (environmental associations, cities and municipalities, federal government, federal states, European Union, United Nations (UN), industry and business; citizens, science); preferred use of the CO2 price; willingness to contribute to climate protection with the following actions: Switching to a green electricity tariff, heating the home less in winter, buying household appliances with a very good energy efficiency rating even more consistently, using the car less often for everyday journeys, giving up air travel completely or partially, eating fewer meals with meat, consuming less overall, living in less living space; commitment to climate protection (publishing opinions, e.g. in social media, convincing others of climate protection in conversations, voting for a party that supports climate protection, participating in demonstrations for climate protection, signing online petitions or initiatives, actively participating in initiatives or organizations, donating money, investing money ecologically, e.g. in ecological funds, solar or wind energy projects); commitment in the aforementioned areas is conceivable in principle; evaluation of global movements for climate protection (great respect for people´s commitment, climate activists mainly spread exaggerated panic and excitement, actions of climate activists an important impetus to do more for climate protection, climate activists not credible, support the concerns of these movements); opinion on slowing down climate change (not dramatic, therefore no need, can be solved with technology without having to fundamentally change lifestyles, fundamental change in lifestyle necessary, politicians must act more quickly and consistently, decisive action necessary at all levels); important areas of political action to advance climate protection (make climate-damaging products more expensive so that climate-friendly products become more competitive, tighten ecological requirements for products, technologies and services, better label climate-friendly products, strengthen education and training for more climate protection, promote the development of climate-friendly products and technologies more strongly, ban particularly climate-damaging products, reduce climate-damaging subsidies); agreement with general statements on climate change (climate change also threatens the basis of life here in Germany, our way of life makes us partly responsible for the consequences of climate change in poorer countries, when it comes to the consequences of climate change, many things are greatly exaggerated, I am afraid of the consequences of climate change, I can´t also take care of climate protection, I personally often lack the opportunities to do something for climate protection, it makes me angry when I see that Germany is failing to meet its climate protection targets, climate change is already happening, so we should urgently take measures to adapt to its consequences); opinion on Germany´s commitment to climate protection (industrialized countries like Germany have an international obligation to lead the way in climate protection, Germany´s climate protection targets should be more ambitious because we are currently doing too little to meet the Paris Agreement, it is in Germany´s own interest to lead the way in climate protection, this creates jobs and strengthens international competitiveness, Germany has more pressing problems and should not lead the way in climate protection, Germany should provide more support to other countries in climate protection and in dealing with the consequences of climate change); assessment of the commitment in the areas of nutrition and food supply as well as agriculture and food production with regard to the following goals: ensure low food prices, create better supply of locally sourced food, reduce packaging waste, create better supply of vegetarian and vegan products and meals, ensure less food is thrown away, create better supply of healthy/balanced food, ensure food is free of pesticides and contaminants, expand organic farming, reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, ensure fair wages and working conditions for workers in the production and processing of food, ensure the welfare of farm animals, make the cultivation and production of food more environmentally friendly, halt the decline in biodiversity, e.g. in birds and insects; and e.g. birds and insects; opinion on the implementation of various measures in the areas of nutrition and food supply as well as agriculture and food production (introduce a uniform seal of approval that makes transparent which animal welfare standards are met, tighten the ecological requirements for food packaging, improve the range of vegetarian and vegan dishes in canteens and restaurants, expand state requirements for limiting food waste, carry out information and advice campaigns on climate-friendly nutrition, e.g. in schools and canteens, strengthen regional value chains in food production, promote the expansion of agriculture more strongly, link agricultural subsidies / state aid to the ecological performance of farmers, use in schools and canteens, strengthen regional value chains in food production, promote the expansion of organic farming more strongly, link agricultural subsidies / state aid to the ecological performance of farmers, reduce the use of pesticides, reduce the use of fertilizers); evaluate the commitment in the area of mobility with regard to the following goals: reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport, ensure that everyday journeys can be made practicably and conveniently without a car, increase road safety, ensure that everyday journeys can be made cost-effectively, reduce traffic noise, reduce air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and particulate matter, improve the accessibility of public transport; opinion on the implementation of various measures in the area of mobility (making local public transport cheaper for users, expanding the local public transport network and serving stops more frequently, expanding state funding for charging infrastructure for electric vehicles, including for charging at home, create more cycle paths and cycle lanes, introduce a speed limit of 130 km/h on freeways, change the distribution of road space so that there is more room for cycling and walking and less for cars, introduce a mileage-based car toll, reduce the health impact on people who live on busy roads, e.g. by limiting the speed limit. e.g. by limiting speed limits or driving bans); changing the personal importance of climate protection due to the coronavirus crisis.
Consumption and use: Frequency of use of different means of transport (car (without car sharing), car sharing vehicles, buses and trains in the region, bicycle, train from 100 km distance); airplane use for private travel in 2019; number of air travels in 2019 in short-haul, medium-haul and long-haul, awareness of the possibility of CO2 compensation; self-compensation payments made for all flights, for individual flights in 2019, not self-compensated, but airline or tour operator compensated the flight, no CO2 compensation; number of cars available in the household; reasons why no car in the household; mileage in kilometers per year with this car; driving license possession; car sharing membership in the household (myself, another household member, none); living space in square meters; energy requirements of the main residence; amount of monthly down payment for electricity; estimate of electricity consumption; purchasing behavior (sometimes I consciously afford the very best quality, I make a point of always having the latest technology, e.g. computer or smartphone, I make a point of wearing the latest fashionable clothes, when shopping I always look for good deals, I am often unsure which products are actually environmentally friendly).
Demography: Self-assessment of health status; interest in politics; sex; age; highest school-leaving qualification or university degree; main occupation; residential status; household composition; household size; number of children in the household up to 5 years, from 6 to 10 years, from 11 to 13 years and from 14 to 17 years; migration background (self or parent(s); net household income; occupational group; location; party preference; federal state; residential area.
Additionally coded: sequential number; weighting factor; extrapolation factor; core dimension environmental effect as UBS 2018 (items partially changed), core dimension environmental behaviour as UBS 2018; core dimension environmental cognition as UBS 2018 (reduced); 6-cluster solution; CO2 footprint in tons/year.
B) Additional surveys:
1. Economic structural change: Attitude towards economic structural change (I fundamentally reject economic structural change in order to protect the climate, switching to environmentally and climate-friendly products and production processes offers great employment opportunities that should be exploited, jobs affected by structural change should be retained for as long as possible, politicians should drive structural change forward swiftly but also in a socially responsible manner, there should be support programs, There should be support programs to help companies switch to climate-friendly production processes and products, regions severely affected should receive extensive financial support for sustainable structural change, all those affected should be involved in the planning and implementation of changes, preserving jobs is more important than climate protection, the workforce should be better qualified for future-oriented activities (e.g. production of electric vehicles or energy-efficient renovation of buildings), environmentally harmful or climate-damaging products and production processes should no longer be subsidized); political requirements in relation to the change towards a climate-friendly lifestyle (financial support for people on low incomes if the costs of electricity and heating or mobility increase due to climate protection measures, nationwide advice programs for low-income households that help to save energy costs in housing, subsidy programs for low-income households to purchase energy-saving household appliances, legal regulation to ensure that warm rent does not increase after energy-efficient renovation); right-left self-classification; party preference (Sunday question).
Demography: sex; marital status; nationality; born in Germany; school-leaving qualification; occupational status; household size; number of people aged 18 and over in the household; age of the target person at the time of the survey; age (categorized); employment status; migration background.
Additionally coded: consecutive interview number; interview date (year, month, day) Interview number; interview date (year, month, day); top-bottom scale - grouped; net equivalent income grouped; number of persons under 18 in the household; economic status; federal state; settlement structure region type of the BBSR overall information; EU urban-rural overall information; weighting factors; Nielsen areas; BIK municipality size classes overall information; area unit (west/east) overall information, Berlin West; area unit (west/east) Berlin shown separately.
2. Wood stoves: Wood stove in the house/apartment; frequency of heating with this wood stove in the cold season; reasons for using a wood stove (comfort and coziness, reduce heating costs of the main heating, contribution to climate protection, independent of imported oil and gas); other reasons for using a wood stove (open); evaluation of the following statements on wood stoves as correct or incorrect: Wood stoves and other wood-burning appliances together emit more particulate matter than the engines of cars, trucks and buses; burning wood in a wood stove has no negative impact on the climate; particulate matter from wood stoves is less harmful to health than particulate matter from the engines of cars, trucks and buses; Agreement with various statements on the subject of wood-burning stoves (I feel affected by the smoke and smell of wood-burning stoves in the neighborhood, using wood as a building material makes more sense than burning it in the stove, the legal regulations for wood-burning stoves in Germany are strict enough, heating with wood can contribute to climate protection because fossil fuels are saved, I find wood-burning stoves problematic because they impair air quality); Self-assessment of environmental awareness; interest in climate change and climate protection; residential status; right-left self-assessment; party preference (Sunday question).
Demography: sex; marital status; nationality; born in Germany; school-leaving qualification; occupational status; household size; number of persons aged 18 and over in the household; age of the target person at the time of the interview; age (categorized); employment status; migration background.
Additionally coded: consecutive interview number; interview date (year, month); top-bottom scale - grouped; net equivalent income grouped; number of persons under 18 years of age in the household; economic status; federal state; settlement-structural region type of the BBSR overall information; weighting factor; EU city-country overall information.
3. Climate adaptation: Interest in the topic of climate change and climate protection; level of conviction that we in Germany can overcome the problems resulting from climate change; level of concern about possible future consequences of climate change (flood events or storms lead to damage to my house or apartment, heat waves or periods of hot weather affect my physical well-being or my health, heat waves or periods of hot weather affect my performance, for example at work); agreement with various statements on climate change (I feel sufficiently informed about the possible risks that may be associated with the consequences of climate change for me personally, I think that I am taking sufficient personal precautionary measures, I believe that my city or municipality is sufficiently concerned with the issue and that sufficient precautionary measures are being taken); measures taken to prepare for and prevent climate change (I inform myself about how I should behave in the event of a disaster, for example in the event of extreme weather events or flooding, I insure my house or apartment as part of a natural hazard insurance policy), I insure my house or apartment against climate-related damage caused by floods, landslides, and avalanches, I use warning and information services such as pollen information services, heat warning services or flood warning services, I change my leisure or vacation planning (e.g. I avoid particularly strenuous activities or hot vacation regions), I change my winter sports activities); intended implementation of the aforementioned measures; self-assessment of environmental awareness; right-left self-assessment; party preference (Sunday question).
Demography: sex; marital status; nationality; born in Germany; school-leaving qualification; occupational status; household size; number of persons aged 18 and over in the household; age of the target person at the time of the interview; age (categorized); employment status; migration background.
Additionally coded: consecutive interview number; interview date (year, month); top-bottom scale - grouped; net equivalent income grouped; number of persons under 18 years of age in the household; economic status; federal state; settlement-structural region type of the BBSR overall information; EU city-country overall information weighting factor; Nielsen areas.
Topics: Environment and conservation, Energy and natural resources, Political behaviour and attitudes, Diet and nutrition, General health and well-being, Consumption and consumer behaviour, Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue, Agriculture and rural industry, TRANSPORT AND TRAVEL, Leisure, tourism and sport, Social change, Social conditions and indicators
Date(s) of Data Collection: 11.2020 - 09.2021
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.11.2020 - 08.12.2020, main survey, 11.2020 - 11.2020, add-on survey "economic structural change", 04.2021 - 04.2021, add-on survey "heating with wood", 09.2021 - 09.2021, add-on survey "adaptation to climate change"
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Persons aged 14 and over (Main survey)
Persons aged 18 and over (Additional surveys)
Number of Units:
Haupterhebung: 2115
Zusatzbefragung Holzöfen: 1006
Zusatzbefragung Klimaanpassung: 1023
Zusatzbefragung Wirtschaftlicher Strukturwandel: 1013
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
The respondents of the main survey were recruited via the infas ad hoc panel. The panel participants were recruited via a random sample of landline and mobile phone numbers.
The surveys for the three additonal surveys were each conducted as part of a representative omnibus survey, which is carried out by infas on a monthly basis using a dual-frame sample in the ADM master sample.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
• Telephone interview;
Data Collector: infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft, Bonn
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables:
Haupterhebung: 253
Zusatzbefragung Holzöfen: 47
Zusatzbefragung Klimaanpassung: 47
Zusatzbefragung Wirtschaftlicher Strukturwandel: 48
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Berlin, - Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14278
Study number: ZA8799
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-03-28, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14278
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-03-28 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14278 |
Publications: infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH: Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2020 : Methodenbericht.
Bonn: infas, April 2023
Study group: Environmental Consciousness in Germany, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (395)
information:Variables (395)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 04.11.2020 - 11.11.2020
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7685 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13752
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7685 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13752
Abstract: For the representative survey on the topic of ´Sustainability´, the Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld GmbH interviewed a total of 1,004 randomly selected German-speakin ... more
Abstract: For the representative survey on the topic of ´Sustainability´, the Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld GmbH interviewed a total of 1,004 randomly selected German-speakin ... more
Content: 1. Term and concept of sustainability: awareness of the term sustainability; own idea of the term sustainability (open); awareness of the concept; assessment of the concept; assessment of whether various topics have something to do with sustainability (e.g. use of renewable energies from water, wind or sun, purchase of durable products, use of environmentally friendly means of transport such as bicycle or train, etc.); value of sustainability.
2. Actors and influencing factors for sustainable behaviour: Important actors for more sustainability (politics, economy, consumers, research and science, agriculture, energy suppliers); most important actor for more sustainability; appropriate measures of politics for more sustainability in everyday life; endangered international competitiveness of the German economy through sustainable production of goods; advocacy of sustainability despite economic disadvantages; reasons why people do not pay attention to sustainability (e. g. lack of information, knowledge and education, etc.); sustainable behaviour is more likely to be brought about by punishing non-sustainable behaviour or promoting sustainable behaviour; opinion on the topic of sustainability in school lessons (separate school subject on the topic of sustainability, aspects on sustainability should be dealt with in various other school subjects, no change).
3. Level of information and own behaviour on the topic of sustainability: self-assessment of the level of information on the topic of sustainability; sources of information; own behaviour in everyday life in various areas of life (e.g. purchase of environmentally friendly or regionally produced food, climate-friendly produced electricity, etc.); change in own mobility since the Corona crisis in work and leisure; change in car use since the Corona crisis.
4. Attitude towards life and economic situation: importance of various aspects in life (making financial provisions for old age, taking care of one´s health, helping others, enjoying life to the full, faith and religion, high standing, being able to afford many things, career, taking care of a healthy diet, thinking of future generations, being able to determine one´s own life, taking care of one´s own family, going on many long-distance trips, further education, financial security); party sympathy; assessment of one´s own economic situation.
Demography: age; sex; children; children under 18; education: school-leaving qualification or school-leaving qualification aspired to; university degree; employment status; assessment of job security; professional position; complexity of job; civil service career group; household size; number of persons in the household aged 18 and over; religious denomination; frequency of churchgoing; German citizenship.
Additionally coded were: ID; federal state; Berlin: East/West district; city size; reached via mobile or landline; weighting factor; sustainable no/yes, hedonistic no/yes.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 04.11.2020 - 11.11.2020
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking citizens aged 16 and over
Number of Units: 1004
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Combined landline and mobile phone sample (dual-frame approach, ratio 70:30)
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld GmbH, Mannheim
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata, CSV
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 109
Notes: The survey was commissioned by the Federal Press Office.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung -
Publication year: 2021
DOI: 10.4232/1.13752
Study number: ZA7685
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Research data center: FDZ Wahlen bei GESIS
External links: Federal Press Office
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2021-07-04, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13752
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2021-07-04 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13752 |
Publications: Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld GmbH: Nachhaltigkeit : Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage November 2020.
Mannheim: Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld, Bericht, Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld GmbH: Nachhaltigkeit : November 2020
Mannheim: Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld, Tabellenband
Study group: Surveys commissioned by the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (109)
information:Variables (109)
GESIS, Cologne. Data File Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2043
Availability: Free access (with registration)
Subject area: Sociology
Topics: nutrition, consumption behavior, social inequality, eating behavior, behavior modification, EVS, SOEP, psychosocial factors
Geographic coverage: Germany / DE
Temporal Research Design: cross-section
Primärforschende, Institution: Einhorn, Laura; Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung
Publication year: 2020
DOI: 10.7802/2043
Study number: SDN-10.7802-2043
Publisher: GESIS, Cologne
Current Version: 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.7802/2043
Publications: Einhorn, Laura. 2020 (in press). Food, classed? Social inequality and diet: Understanding stratified meat consumption patterns in Germany.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 22.10.2019 - 19.12.2019
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7853 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13891
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7853 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13891
Abstract: The study ´Families in Germany´ was conducted by USUMA on behalf of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. During the survey period 22.10.2019 to 19.12.2019, 3,022 persons aged ... more
Abstract: The study ´Families in Germany´ was conducted by USUMA on behalf of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. During the survey period 22.10.2019 to 19.12.2019, 3,022 persons aged ... more
Content: Family norms: People with children/ without children happier in life; gender roles: Important aspects of a good father/mother (cooking a hot meal a day for the children, helping the children with their homework, working only part-time, working full-time, taking care of the household, taking care of the sick child, not working); Division of household chores between the respondent and the partner in terms of cooking meals, grocery shopping, minor repairs in the house/apartment, laundry, doing taxes, cleaning the house/apartment, doing homework with the children, taking care of the children when they are sick; pressure of expectations: Agreement with various statements regarding expectations of third parties (being successful in one´s job, taking care of the household, looking good, doing something special in one´s free time, being happy, doing voluntary work, cooking meals for the family, family living healthily/ being happy, children doing well at school, living in a happy relationship); perceived own situation regarding the aforementioned expectations; importance of areas of life (own family and children, job and work, leisure and recreation, friends and acquaintances, time for myself); satisfaction with different areas of life (with current life, housing situation, work situation, family situation as well as with current partnership); frequency of feeling under pressure; sustainability: Importance of the topic of environmental and climate protection; frequency of conversations about environmental and climate protection topics with work colleagues, friends or acquaintances, parents, partner and children; attitude towards the climate demonstrations Fridays for future; nutrition: frequency of shared meals in the family; frequency of shared hot meals for the family or for oneself; importance of different characteristics of food (own and fresh preparation (no ready-made products), balanced, healthy food, vegetarian/ vegan food, food with meat, regional products/ organic products, tasty food, simple and fast food (e.g. fast food, frozen products, curry sausage).
Demography: sex; age; marital status; stable partnership; sex of partner; living with partner in a joint household; children; number of children; information on children: Age; child in common; child of the respondent; child of the partner; child lives in the same household; party preference in the next federal election (Sunday question); education; employment situation; occupational status; religious affiliation; frequency of attendance at religious services; migration background of the respondent or one of the parents; federal state; size of town; number of mobile phone numbers on which the respondent can be reached; number of landline phone numbers; size of household; number of children under 18 in the household.
Information on the partner: education; employment situation or situation if not employed; occupational status.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; weighting factors; categorisation of legal guardian; categorisation of situation; split groups.
Topics: Family life and marriage, Gender and gender roles, Social conditions and indicators, Environment and conservation, Diet and nutrition
Date(s) of Data Collection: 22.10.2019 - 19.12.2019
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Population aged 18 and over living in private households in Germany
Number of Units: 3022
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Multi-stage stratified random sample from the ADM sample frames for landline and mobile numbers (dual-frame sample in the ratio 50% mobile and 50% landline) with N=3,022, with N=1,521 with persons living in Germany who do not have parental authority for at least one minor child at the time of the interview and N=1,501 with persons living in Germany with parental authority for at least one minor child.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: USUMA, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 125
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Neu, Viola - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin, Pokorny, Sabine - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin, Roose, Jochen - Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Berlin
Publication year: 2022
DOI: 10.4232/1.13891
Study number: ZA7853
Publisher: GESIS
External links: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2022-03-17, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13891
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2022-03-17 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13891 |
Publications: Pokorny, Sabine (2020): Umwelt- und Klimaschutz in den Familien. Analysen und Argumente Nr. 395. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Pokorny, Sabine (2021): Haushalt ist Frauensache? Familienleben vor und während der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse aus repräsentativen und qualitativen Befragungen. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., USUMA Markt- und Sozialforschung:
Repräsentative Telefonbefragung von 3 Bevölkerungsgruppen zum Thema „Familien in Deutschland“ - Methodenbericht.
Berlin: USUMA GmbH, 2020
Study group: Studies Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Families in Germany (Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung), GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (125)
information:Variables (125)
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Berlin; Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau
Date(s) of Data Collection: 30.04.2019 - 02.06.2019
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7564 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13656
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7564 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13656
Abstract: In the youth study "Future? Ask the Youth!", sustainability-related views, attitudes and behaviours of young people between the ages of 14 and 22 were investigated. Speci ... more
Abstract: In the youth study "Future? Ask the Youth!", sustainability-related views, attitudes and behaviours of young people between the ages of 14 and 22 were investigated. Speci ... more
Content: Wave 1:
Topics: 1. Topic interests and general self-efficacy: interest in various topics; top 5 topic interests; general self-efficacy (in difficult situations I can rely on my abilities, I can cope well with most problems on my own, I can also usually solve strenuous and complicated tasks well).
2. Attitudes towards politics and society and political self-efficacy: importance of various social problems (e.g. social justice, economic development, crime, public safety, etc.); socio-political attitudes (it is very important to me to live in a democracy, I think it is good that the European Union exists, I think it is important to take part in elections, I am not really interested in politics, we need more economic growth in the future, even if it burdens the environment, it worries me when I think about the environmental conditions in which future generations will probably have to live); political self-efficacy (Political Efficacy Short Scale).
3. Environmental and climate policy: most important actors in environmental and climate protection (e.g. each and every individual, environmental associations, cities, municipalities, federal government, industry, media, schools and other educational institutions, scientists, people who invest a lot of money in certain shares, funds, etc.); sufficient activities of the aforementioned actors in Germany for environmental and climate protection; importance of central topics or demands of environmental and climate policy (e.g. limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius in the long term, introducing a tax on the emission of greenhouse gases harmful to the climate, etc.); most important topics of environmental and climate policy; most important measures of environmental and climate policy (e.g. financial support of environmentally and climate-friendly products and behaviour, higher taxation of environmentally and climate-damaging products and behaviour, etc.).
Wave 2:
Topics: 1. Fridays for future: knowledge of the Fridays for future movement; assessment of Fridays for future; willingness to commit to Fridays for future: current participation; willingness to (re)participate in Fridays for future in the future; most important reasons for (future) participation in Fridays for future; most important obstacles to participation in Fridays for future.
2. Influence and engagement: forms of political and social engagement so far (e.g. supported online actions and online petitions, participated in demonstrations, worked in a nature and environmental protection group, etc.); willingness to engage in different forms of political and social engagement.
3. Sustainability, social issues, digitalisation: Split 1: Synergies and conflicts of ecology and social issues: interest in social issues; opinion on the impact of environmental and climate protection on social goals (e.g. it is unfair that poorer people cannot afford environmentally friendly products, more environmental and climate protection in housing construction leads to higher rents, etc.). ); importance of various social issues; Split 2: Synergies and conflicts of sustainability and digitalisation: interests in the topic of digitalisation; opinion on the impact of increasing digitalisation on the environment and climate (e.g. digitalisation is harmful to the environment and climate because of the high power consumption of devices and data centres, more and more natural raw materials are mined for digital devices such as smartphones or computers, etc.); importance of various topics of digitalisation.
4. Information behaviour, environmental education and environmental knowledge: Sources of information on environmental protection and nature conservation; importance and existence of various participation-oriented projects and courses on sustainability topics at one´s own educational institution; action-relevant environmental knowledge (reasons why beef is harmful to the climate, most energy-saving lighting, environmental label of the Federal Government for environmentally friendly products, reduction of the greenhouse effect through building insulation, CO2 footprint of a product, reasons for using as little detergent and cleaning agent as possible, most environmentally harmful beverage packaging, threat to the population of wild bees, largest energy consumer in the household).
Demography: sex; age (open and categories); educational attainment; level of education; current type of school (if student); current occupation (if not student); occupation; household type; sources of income (parents, own income, BAföG, scholarship, unemployment benefit or ALG II, other); migration background of the respondent or his/her parents; country of origin.
Additionally coded were: Respondent ID; number of units; youth segments (idealistic, pragmatic, distanced); federal state; place size; east/west; weighting factor.
Topics: Leisure, tourism and sport, Diet and nutrition, Political behaviour and attitudes, TRANSPORT AND TRAVEL, NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, Environment and conservation, Consumption and consumer behaviour
Date(s) of Data Collection: 30.04.2019 - 02.06.2019
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Resident population in Germany aged 14 to 22 years
Number of Units: 1007
Sampling Procedure: • Non-probability: Quota;
Basis for selection: Online Access Panel of Norstat Germany (www.norstat.de)
Quotation representative of the population according to the following characteristics age, sex, education and region
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Data Collector: aproxima Gesellschaft für Markt- und Sozialforschung Weimar mbH, Weimar
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 337
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Berlin, - Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau
Publication year: 2021
DOI: 10.4232/1.13656
Study number: ZA7564
Contributor, Institution, Role: Gossen, Maike - Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW) GmbH - ProjectLeader
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
External links: Survey at Umweltbundesamt
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2021-01-06, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13656
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2021-01-06 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13656 |
Publications: „Zukunft? Jugend fragen! Umwelt, Klima, Politik, Engagement – Was junge Menschen bewegt“ (https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/zukunft-jugend-fragen) , aproxima Gesellschaft für Markt- und Sozialforschung Weimar mbH: Onlinebefragung zur IÖW Jugendstudie 2019 - Methodenbericht.
Weimar: 2019
Study group: Environmental Consciousness in Germany, GESIS Community Data
Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Berlin; Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.08.2018 - 21.12.2018
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7493 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13634
GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7493 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13634
Abstract: The Study on Environmental Consciousness in Germany has been conducting research on the development of environmental consciousness and environmental behaviour of the popu ... more
Abstract: The Study on Environmental Consciousness in Germany has been conducting research on the development of environmental consciousness and environmental behaviour of the popu ... more
Topics: Diet and nutrition, Specific diseases, disorders and medical conditions, Political behaviour and attitudes, TRANSPORT AND TRAVEL, Energy and natural resources, Environment and conservation, Agriculture and rural industry, Consumption and consumer behaviour, Housing
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.08.2018 - 21.12.2018
Date(s) of Data Collection: 23.08.2018 - 05.09.2018, wave 1, 05.09.2018 - 20.09.2018, wave 2, 14.12.2018 - 21.12.2018, post-collection
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking persons aged 14 and over in private households
Number of Units: 2021 (Welle 1) & 2017 (Welle 2) & 2004 (Nacherhebung)
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Recruitment sample: probability selection: Multi-stage random selection, survey sample: probability selection from the Forsa-Omninet Panel. The Forsa-Omninet panel includes both internet users and people without internet access.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI) For respondents without internet access, the interview was conducted using a tablet or a set-top box via the television.
Data Collector: forsa Politik- und Sozialforschung GmbH, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 407 (Welle 1) & 306 (Welle 2) & 36 (Nacherhebung)
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Berlin, - Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Dessau-Roßlau
Publication year: 2020
DOI: 10.4232/1.13634
Study number: ZA7493
Contributor, Institution, Role: Rubik, Frieder - Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung - ProjectLeader
Publisher: GESIS Data Archive
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2020-11-25, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13634
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2020-11-25 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13634 |
Publications: Rubik, Frieder; Müller, Ria; Harnisch, Richard; Holzhauer, Brigitte; Schipperges, Michael und Geiger, Sonja: Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2018 : Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage.
Berlin, Dessau Roßlau: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU); Umweltbundesamt (UBA), 2019
(https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/umweltbewusstsein-in-deutschland-2018)
Study group: Environmental Consciousness in Germany, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (749)
information:Variables (749)
