Topic
Author
Publication year
Geography
Source
Study title
Study group
Collection year
Thematic collection
show more filters
(91) |
(36) |
| more... |
(30) |
(22) |
(22) |
(20) |
(19) |
| more... |
to |
(7) |
(9) |
(1) |
(7) |
(2) |
(4) |
(3) |
(7) |
(9) |
(3) |
(4) |
(19) |
(6) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(79) |
(21) |
(19) |
(17) |
(16) |
(14) |
(13) |
(13) |
(13) |
(12) |
| more... |
| more... |
(32) |
| more... |
to |
(3) |
(2) |
(8) |
(1) |
(5) |
(7) |
(2) |
(5) |
(3) |
(7) |
(4) |
(13) |
(3) |
(8) |
(3) |
(4) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(3) |
(1) |
(2) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(19) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(1) |
(4) |
| more... |
MethodologyMode of Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Temporal Research Design
Analysis Unit
Kind of Data
More filtersInterview language
(2) |
(1) |
| more... |
(29) |
Analysis Unit
(53) |
(51) |
Sort by:
GESIS Search
Find information about social science research data, publications on research data as well as open access publications.
Links between contents are displayed directly in the hit list. For example, you can find matching publications to the research data found.
The results can be filtered quickly and conveniently according to the following categories:
- Research data
- Variables from questionnaires
- Instruments and tools
- Literature
- Publications on research data and survey instruments
- Open-access Publications in the Social Sciences
- Literature on "Women in Science and Research"
- Collections of the GESIS library
- General information and offers on the GESIS websites
Contact: suche@gesis.org
The GESIS Library is a special library for Empirical Social Research and Applied Computer Science. It is available to external users as a reference library in Cologne and Mannheim.
The cooperation with the Research Data Center Education at the DIPF enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of educational research. The measurement instruments documented there can be used free of charge for non-commercial purposes.
The cooperation with the Open Test Archive at the Leibniz Institute of Psychology (ZPID) enables us to show you also hits on measurement instruments in the field of psychology and related disciplines. The measurement instruments documented there are protected by copyright and are made available free of charge ("Open Access") for use in research, teaching and practice under a Creative Commons license.
Date(s) of Data Collection: 21.08.2023 - 04.09.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8725 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14249
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8725 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14249
Abstract: The study on socio-political modernisation: attitudes of LGBTIQ(+) respondents was conducted by Kantar Public on behalf of the Press and Information Office of the Federal ... more
Abstract: The study on socio-political modernisation: attitudes of LGBTIQ(+) respondents was conducted by Kantar Public on behalf of the Press and Information Office of the Federal ... more
Content: 1. Attitude towards life, social environment: Life satisfaction; satisfaction with various aspects (education and qualifications, health situation, family situation, own financial situation); dealing with own gender identity in the social environment (family, circle of friends, with work colleagues/at work, with classmates/ fellow students, with other acquaintances); dealing with own sexual orientation in the social environment in the aforementioned groups; identification with the term queer; agreement with statements about one´s own gender identity (my gender identity is a central component of my personality, I feel comfortable with my gender identity, even if I could change my gender identity, I would not do so); agreement with statements about one´s own sexual orientation (my sexual orientation is a central component of my personality, I feel comfortable with my sexual orientation, even if I could change my sexual orientation, I would not do so).
2. Political attitudes and expectations of politics: interest in politics; satisfaction with various areas in Germany (health care, social security, situation on the labor market, functioning of democracy, dealing with other opinions, education system, social cohesion); political effectiveness (politicians care about what people like me think); trust in institutions (judiciary, queer associations and initiatives, federal government, political parties, Bundestag, media, police, local authorities, city administration, churches, queer commissioner of the federal government); expectations of politics with regard to various political demands on the subject of equality (e.g. equal pay for equal work, regardless of gender identity, higher penalties for perpetrators of discrimination, gender and sexual diversity should be included in school curricula, the needs of queer people must be included in the training of medical and social professions, etc.); responsible actors for the equality of queer people in society (federal government, EU Commission, city/municipality, citizens, the queer community itself, society as a whole).
3. Legal changes: Concept of family (also when people live together without children, when people live together unmarried, when same-sex couples live together, when more than two adults raise children together, when people take permanent responsibility for each other, even without being related or living in a relationship); planned changes in family law: attitude towards the introduction of a community of responsibility; opinion on the extension of the right to a name (possibility for children to have the surname of both parents as a double surname).
4. Improvement of the rights of queer people: queer people need more protection against discrimination vs. do not need more protection; opinion on the expansion of gender designations in the gender entry; opinion on the inclusion of a ban on discrimination based on sexual identity in the German Basic Law; opinion on the planned self-determination law for queer people; opinion on the legal adaptation of the parentage law; opinion on the planned amendment to the Transfusion Act; expectation of more acceptance and tolerance for queer people through the planned or already implemented changes; opinion on the pace of change; expected change in social cohesion through measures such as a ban on discrimination against queer people, the Self-Determination Act and the amended law on blood donation.
5. Prejudice and discrimination: prevalence of discrimination in Germany based on ethnic origin, sex or gender identity, sexual orientation (e.g. gay, lesbian, bisexual), age, religion or belief, disability or chronic illness; prevalence of prejudice against queer people in Germany; changes in prejudice against queer people in Germany over the past 10 years; equality for queer people in Germany as an important issue that concerns the whole of society vs. Only those affected are interested; evaluation of various legal regulations on the equal treatment of queer people (legal equality of homosexual marriage, equal rights in adoption for same-sex couples, equal support for artificial insemination for same-sex couples); agreement with various statements regarding queer people (queer people make society more open and tolerant, too much attention is paid to the concerns of queer people, more must be done for the social recognition of queer people, queer people must be legally equal in all areas, I can´t do anything with different sexual orientations, I can´t do anything with different gender identities, I don´t care about the sexual orientation of others, I don´t care about the gender identity of others, everyone has the right to freely choose their gender identity regardless of their birth sex, queer people deserve the same respect as everyone else, our society would lack something without queer people, the lifestyle of queer people makes social cohesion more complicated, too many concessions to alternative living arrangements lead to social problems); own experience of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity; areas in which discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity was experienced (e.g. during school and training) e.g. during school and training, at work, in stores or in the service sector, at insurance companies or banks, etc.); experience of discrimination against other queer people; knowledge of contact points in the event of discrimination; desired offers of help or support in the event of discrimination (open), knowledge of rights if the respondent is a victim of discrimination themselves; assessment of the idea of a law against discrimination; knowledge of the General Equal Treatment Act (AGG) in Germany; assessment of this law; places where the federal and state governments should promote educational programs to prevent discrimination against queer people (in schools and youth work, in the workplace, in cultural institutions such as museums, in medical facilities, in counseling facilities for queer people); sufficient efforts in Germany to reduce all forms of discrimination; opinion on discrimination in Germany on the basis of gender identity (people who do not feel they belong to the sex they were assigned at birth are often treated with less respect than others/ have worse chances on the job market, people who feel they are neither a man nor a woman have worse chances on the job market); opinion on discrimination based on sexual orientation (non-heterosexual people are usually treated with the same respect as others, non-heterosexual people are often treated with hostility in public when they kiss or show other forms of affection, non-heterosexual people who work in education or train young people are often distrusted, non-heterosexual young people are often bullied at school).
6. Commitment: forms of own political commitment to queer projects and demands (participation in signature campaign/online petition, comments posted in social networks/online forums on political issues, participation in rallies or demonstrations, involvement in a group or association that supports the concerns of queer people); party sympathy.
Demography: age; age groups; federal state; region Germany West/East; education; sex; preferred name for gender identity; other name (open); sexual orientation; sexual orientation: other orientation (open); employment; marital status; self-location social class; size of location; household size; number of children in household; immigration history: migration background (respondent himself/herself, one parent, both parents); net household income (grouped).
Additionally coded were: Respondent number, weighting factor.
Topics: Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Minorities, Family life and marriage, Gender and gender roles, Legislation and legal systems, Political behaviour and attitudes, Social change, Government, political systems and organisations
Date(s) of Data Collection: 21.08.2023 - 04.09.2023
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: German-speaking people aged 16 and over who are either not heterosexual or do not feel that they clearly belong to the male or female sex
Number of Units: 1009
Sampling Procedure: • Non-probability: Quota;
Quota sample from online access panel
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Data Collector: Kantar Public, Berlin
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata, CSV
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 166
Notes: The survey was commissioned by the Federal Press Office.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung, Berlin
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14249
Study number: ZA8725
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ Wahlen bei GESIS
External links: Federal Press Office
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-04-16, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14249
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-04-16 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14249 |
Publications: Kantar Public: Ergebnisbericht : LSBTIQ(+)-Community - Eine Studie von Kantar Public
für das Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung.
Berlin: Kantar Public, September 2023, Kantar Public: LSBTI-Community : Eine Studie von Kantar Public im Auftrag des
Presse- und Informationsamtes der Bundesregierung (BPA). Tabellenbericht.
Berlin: Kantar Public, September 2023
Study group: Surveys commissioned by the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government, GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Publications (2)
information:Publications (2)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 19.09.2000 - 25.11.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA6345 Data file Version 8.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14399
GESIS, Cologne. ZA6345 Data file Version 8.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14399
Abstract: The Thüringen-Monitor is a representative population survey on political culture in the Free State of Thuringia that has been held annually since 2000. It contains fixed ... more
Abstract: The Thüringen-Monitor is a representative population survey on political culture in the Free State of Thuringia that has been held annually since 2000. It contains fixed ... more
Content: Sociodemography: age (year of birth); sex; occupational status; length of unemployment (in months); unemployment longer than six months since the fall of communism; employment in the public sector; occupation; main occupation; highest educational attainment of respondent; highest educational attainment of parents; education of partner; activity of partner; GDR citizen before October 1989; number of grandchildren; marital status; place of birth; net household income; household composition: number of children under 18 (2000: under 16) years of age in the household; number of persons in the household as a whole; number of persons in the household from 18 years of age; household size (grouped); number of children outside the household; children currently attending day-care centre, school, (technical) college; number of own children in total; number of desired children; number of children in school; number of children under 6 years of age; frequency of church attendance; fixed partnership; living together with partner; denomination; housing situation; job security; socialisation (East/West / abroad); residential status; number of telephone numbers in the household.
Additionally coded was: Wave (survey year); interview number; person weight; quota groups gender and age for IPF weighting from 2012 onwards; random variables (2013, 2014); answer open question and question order (2015); average population share district 2005 to 2009; consistency of freedom; class of location; residence size; perceived responsivity of other public right-wing extremist activities (share of district in total number of Thuringia and number of incidents in district); suspected right-wing extremist crimes (share of district in total number of Thuringia and number of incidents in district).
Wave 2000:
Agreement with various statements: Thuringia need not shy away from comparison with many West German states; the economic situation in Thuringia is better than in other East German states; identity as a Thuringian, as an East German, as a German or as a European; assessment of the economic situation in Thuringia and of one´s own financial situation; fair share of standard of living compared with others in Germany; preponderance of advantages or disadvantages of German unification; personally experienced disadvantage due to East German origin; preference for freedom vs. equality or freedom vs. security.
Politics and society: left-right self-ranking; interest in politics; democracy as the best of all state ideas; satisfaction with democracy; trust in institutions (federal government, state government, courts, police, doctors, nurses); overfamiliarity with many foreigners; can understand and assess political issues well; agreement with various statements: foreigners only come here to exploit our welfare state; there are valuable and unvaluable lives; foreigners should in principle choose their spouses from among their own countrymen; our country needs tough and vigorous enforcement of German interests against foreign countries; in the national interest, a dictatorship is the better form of government in certain circumstances; people like me have no influence on what the government does (political efficacy); parties only want the votes of the electorate, they are not interested in their views; today everything is changing so fast that I often don´t know what to stick to (anomie); fear of crime; fear of descent; satisfaction with life; some groups of people are simply superior to others; in order to get ahead in life one has to override others; desire for a return to the socialist order; Jews today try to take advantage of the fact that they were the victims during the Nazi era; open up more to the values and standards of other cultures in the future; most refugees and asylum seekers cannot be integrated into Germany at all because of their culture; immigrants should be allowed to retain their lifestyle; women should once again focus more on the role of wife and mother; associations associated with the concept of home; importance of home; attachment to the community, to the region, to Thuringia, to Germany and to Europe; Region; importance of various aspects for an identity as a Thuringian (being born in Thuringia, having at least one Thuringian parent, feeling Thuringian, participating in political life in Thuringia, having grown up in Thuringia, having lived in Thuringia for a long time, speaking one of the Thuringian dialects, maintaining Thuringian traditions); assessment of the environment with regard to: Job prospects, educational opportunities, leisure and cultural opportunities, environmental conditions, living conditions, shopping opportunities, local public transport, provision of doctors and care facilities, accessibility of authorities, childcare facilities and schools, internet access, public safety; willingness to deal with official matters via the internet; future of own region; Saving the environment only with less consumption; priority for economic growth, unless the environment is damaged in the process; to protect the environment, people should do without their own cars; opinion on measures in the course of a climate-friendly energy policy; generally for or against recruiting workers abroad in a targeted manner; assessment of people of different origins, religions and cultures living together in Thuringia; Personal contact with refugees or asylum seekers; feelings when meeting refugees in person; feeling disturbed by the building of mosques in the neighbourhood; feeling disturbed when Muslim women wear headscarves in public; party affiliation; strength of party affiliation; political participation: approaching a politician, taking part in a signature campaign, working in a political party or citizens´ initiative, fighting for one´s own goals, even with the use of violence; willingness to do voluntary work; being overly alienated by the many foreigners in Thuringia; with the policies that Israel is pursuing, I can well understand that people have something against Jews; most unemployed people make a nice life for themselves at the expense of others; in these times we absolutely need a strong hand; demand obedience and discipline from one´s own children to raise them to be decent citizens; attitude towards Muslims (most Muslims accept our values laid down in the Basic Law, make too many demands, Muslims should be banned from immigrating to Germany); the state should be generous when examining asylum applications; National Socialism also had its good sides; German achievements greater than those of other peoples; right of the strongest also in society; most asylum seekers do not really fear persecution in their home country; in our democracy people´s concerns are no longer effectively represented; more should be done for the majority in the country than worrying about minorities; we should think more about our traditions again; West Germans treat East Germans as second-class people; GDR had more good sides than bad; Jews have something special and peculiar about them and don´t really fit in; social cohesion in Germany is endangered; repatriation of all refugees and asylum seekers to their home countries as soon as war and persecution have ended; compulsory participation in integration and language courses for all refugees and asylum seekers; those who have lived here all their lives should have more rights than those who moved here later; living environment overly alienated by the many foreigners.
Demography: age (year of birth); marital status; occupation; socialisation east/west; occupational status; employment in public service; job security; education; household size; total number of children; number of children under 18; religious community; migration background; moving to Thuringia from another federal state or from abroad; intention to move away; net income.
Wave 2019:
Health: satisfaction with medical care in Germany and in Thuringia; satisfaction with health insurance services; satisfaction with health care in the immediate vicinity with regard to: GPs, specialists, accessibility of the nearest hospital, provision of psychotherapists, pharmacies, outpatient nursing services, health advice facilities, provision of midwives and birthing centres, waiting time for an appointment with specialists; gaps in provision or other problems in the area of health care (open); opinion on the job description of care assistants in GP practices; assessment of the personal financial burden of medical treatment and medication; assessment of measures to maintain and promote health in one´s own workplace; attitude towards organ donation; blood donors.
Care: assessment of the personal financial burden of care; assessment of the time burden, the health burden as well as the burden on one´s occupation due to care tasks; acceptance of senior housing community or multi-generation house as a possibility of living in old age; willingness to move into an age-appropriate flat.
Health policy measures: Importance of various health policy measures (attracting family doctors to rural areas, setting up medical health centres, recruiting nursing and health professionals from abroad, expanding medical school places, promoting medical care and advice via the internet (video consultation hours), promoting mobile medical practices in rural areas and expanding offers for preventing illness and maintaining health; for vs. against recruiting care workers from abroad; support for higher salaries for care workers; agreement with the demand for all citizens, i.e. also civil servants and self-employed, to be insured in the statutory health insurance funds.
Demography: member of a statutory health insurance fund or privately insured; chronic illness or disability; own need for care (care degree); occupation; completed vocational training; highest educational attainment of parents.
Wave 2020:
Corona crisis: Personally affected by Corona resp. relatives, friends or close acquaintances; demand harsher punishments for people who do not comply with Corona measures; to protect the population from the Corona virus, basic rights must also be restricted if necessary; should be grateful for leaders who tell us how to deal with the Corona crisis; danger from the Corona virus is greatly exaggerated by the media; existence of secret organisations that have great influence on political decisions during the Corona crisis; uncertainty due to changing assessments by experts; Corona virus no worse than flu; Trust own feelings in dealing with Corona more than experts; in dealing with the Corona crisis, the opposition should not criticise the government but support it; assessment of the danger posed by the Corona crisis with regard to the health system, social cohesion, the economy, basic democratic rights, one´s own health and personal economic situation; willingness to be vaccinated; assessment of various measures to contain the Corona pandemic (restriction of personal contacts, compulsory wearing of masks, closure of schools and day-care centres, closure of shops and restaurants; too few vs. too many measures taken by politicians with regard to the following: medical care, restriction of public life, reduction of economic damage; personally most important (open) for coping with the Corona crisis; satisfaction with public communication by politicians during the Corona crisis; changes in personal life during the Corona crisis with regard to family life, personal economic situation, and social contacts; satisfaction with previous policies during the Corona crisis at the federal, district/city, and state level; trust in science; important decisions in a democracy should better be made by independent experts than by elected politicians; it is time for more resistance against current policies.
Wave 2021:
Corona crisis: Evaluation of the Corona policy of the federal government, the state government, the municipality; perception of dangers posed by the Corona crisis for social cohesion, for basic democratic rights, for one´s own health, for one´s personal economic situation as well as for the educational opportunities of young people; danger posed by the Corona virus is greatly exaggerated by the media; existence of secret organisations that have great influence on political decisions during the Corona crisis; Corona virus no worse than flu; trust own feelings more than experts when dealing with Corona; government has deliberately put population in fear in order to be able to enforce massive restrictions on basic rights; measures to contain the pandemic are greatly exaggerated; politicians are doing enough to explain measures; must be careful not to slide into dictatorship; those who compare Corona restrictions with Nazi period ridicule real victims of Nazi dictatorship; personally affected by Corona in terms of health; willing to take part in a protest demonstration against Corona measures.
Understanding of democracy: most important feature of democracy; assessment of relevance of different features of democracy: equality before the law; state cares for the weak; equal life chances for all; freedom of expression; free and secret elections; strong opposition; minority rights; politicians align policies with citizens´ wishes; politicians inform themselves about citizens´ wishes; politicians explain decisions; equal rights for all who live permanently in the country; MPs should be mirrors of society; close dialogue between politics and citizens; active participation of citizens.
Wave 2022:
Thuringia need not fear comparison with many West German federal states; economic situation in Thuringia is better than in other East German federal states; assessment of economic situation in Thuringia and own financial situation; fair share of standard of living compared with others in Germany; predominance of advantages or disadvantages of German unification; personally experienced disadvantage due to East German origin; interest in politics; democracy is the best of all state ideas; satisfaction with democracy; trust in institutions (federal government, state government, courts, mayors in Thuringia, agreement with various statements: Over-alienation of the Federal Republic by the many foreigners; the foreigners only come here to take advantage of our welfare state; there is valuable and unvaluable life; foreigners should in principle choose their spouses from among their own compatriots; our country needs a tough and vigorous enforcement of German interests vis-à-vis foreign countries; in the national interest, under certain circumstances, a dictatorship is the better form of government; people like me have no influence either way on what the government does (political efficacy); parties only want the votes of the electorate, they are not interested in their views; today everything changes so fast that I often don´t know what to adhere to (anomie); fear of crime; fear of descent; life satisfaction; some groups of people are simply superior to others; in order to get ahead in life, one must override others; desire for a return to the socialist order; feminism systematically disadvantages men in our society; the people should make the most important decisions and not the politicians; politicians are always in agreement when it comes to protecting their privileges; the government deliberately frightened the population in the Corona crisis in order to be able to impose massive restrictions on fundamental rights.
Town and country: associations with the terms town and country (open); characterisation of one´s own town or municipality on the basis of pairs of opposites (rural/ urban, traditional/ modern, anonymous/ socially networked, remote/ central, family unfriendly/ family friendly, quiet/ lively, not an attractive place to live/ an attractive place to live); attachment to the town or municipality, the region and to Thuringia; satisfaction with the place of residence with regard to the following aspects: mobile data provision, local public transport, emergency care and provision of GPs; accessibility of: Shopping facilities for everyday needs, specialist doctor, cultural and leisure facilities, childcare facilities and schools as well as offers of care services; satisfaction with the help among neighbours and acquaintances, the activity of associations and the willingness to do voluntary work; assessment of the development of the town/municipality in the last 10 to 15 years; Assessment of the economic situation of the town or municipality compared to the rest of Thuringia and compared to the rest of Germany; expected future development of the town or municipality; perception of problems for the town or municipality due to out-migration of young people, lack of skilled workers among young people and availability of affordable housing; opinion on state politics and the people in the rest of Thuringia (the politicians in Erfurt have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, the people in the rest of Thuringia do not understand and respect how the people in my region live, the politicians in Erfurt are not interested in the region I live in); opinion about federal politics and about the people in the rest of Germany (the politicians in Berlin have done too little to improve the economic situation in my region, the people in the rest of Germany do not understand and respect how the people in my region live, the politicians in Berlin are not interested in the region where I live); agreement with new renewable energy plants in the residential area; sufficient consideration of citizens´ concerns when building renewable energy plants.
Party affiliation; political participation (participation in a signature collection, participation in a political party, participation in an authorized or an an unauthorized demonstration, political violence); volunteer work; regular participation in federal elections; agreement with various statements: with the policies Israel is making, I can well understand having something against Jews; it worries me to get more and more on the losing side of life due to social development; in these times we absolutely need a strong hand; whoever wants to raise his children to be decent citizens must demand obedience and discipline from them above all; most Muslims living in Germany accept our values as they are laid down in the Basic Law; National Socialism also had its good sides; other peoples may have accomplished important things, but they do not come close to German achievements; as in nature, the strongest should always prevail in society; politicians generally strive to represent the interests of the people; the ruling and powerful act against the interests of the ordinary people; it is time to show more resistance to current politics; we should think more about our traditions again; West Germans treat East Germans as second-class people; the GDR had more good sides than bad; the Jews have something special and peculiar about them and don´t really fit in with us; the citizens in Germany agree in principle about what must happen politically; what is called compromise in politics is really just a betrayal of principles; there is always talk only about the persecution of the Jews, how the Germans suffered, nobody talks about that; the ruling elites are pursuing the goal of replacing the German people with immigrants; the Western world has conspired against Russia and Putin in order to expand its own power; my living environment has been dangerously alienated by the many foreigners; nowadays, one cannot express one´s opinion freely because otherwise one could be at a disadvantage.
Demography: age (year of birth); sex; marital status; occupation; socialization; length of residence in the place of residence; occupation; job security; financial worries due to higher cost of living as a result of inflation; education: highest school-leaving qualification; highest vocational qualification; household size; number of children in the household; own children outside the household; religious community; size of place; net household income.
Topics: Migration, Cultural and national identity, Religion and values, Social conditions and indicators, Social behaviour and attitudes, International politics and organisations, Political ideology, Political behaviour and attitudes, Government, political systems and organisations, Family life and marriage, Minorities, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Economic policy, public expenditure and revenue
Date(s) of Data Collection: 19.09.2000 - 25.11.2023
Date(s) of Data Collection: 19.09.2000 - 25.09.2000, 16.05.2001 - 31.05.2001, 13.08.2002 - 18.08.2002, 03.09.2003 - 09.09.2003, 13.09.2004 - 28.09.2004, 20.06.2005 - 03.07.2005, 28.06.2006 - 18.07.2006, 11.10.2007 - 24.10.2007, 26.06.2008 - 10.07.2008, 11.01.2010 - 30.01.2010, 02.05.2011 - 10.05.2011, 21.05.2012 - 09.06.2012, 13.05.2013 - 27.05.2013, 26.05.2014 - 18.06.2014, 08.06.2015 - 27.06.2015, 30.05.2016 - 25.06.2016, 29.05.2017 - 26.06.2017, 31.05.2018 - 07.07.2018, 27.05.2019 - 06.07.2019, 03.09.2020 - 05.10.2020, 04.06.2021 - 03.07.2021, 19.09.2022 - 06.12.2022, 11.09.2023 - 25.11.2023
Geographic coverage: Thuringia (DE-TH)
Universe: Eligible voters aged 18 and over in private households
Number of Units: 24477
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Probability sample: Multi-stage random sample
The age group 16-29 was overrepresented in 2001 (oversampling, N=600)
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal: Trend/Repeated cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: Infratest dimap, Bonn (2000 bis einschließlich 2008);
aproxima, Weimar (2010);
Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld, Mannheim (2011);
Institut für Soziologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena (seit 2012)
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 1431
Notes: In addition to a traditional variable list and the original questionnaires, a question register is provided in Excel format in which the availability of the variables by survey wave, the item wording and all changes and modifications are documented.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Schmitt, Karl - Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Best, Heinrich - Institut für Soziologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Reiser, Marion - Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14399, 10.4232/1.14191, 10.4232/1.13952, 10.4232/1.13811, 10.4232/1.13524, 10.4232/1.13311, 10.4232/1.13128, 10.4232/1.12570
Study number: ZA6345
Publisher: GESIS
External links: project page
Current Version: 8.0.0, 2024-09-30, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14399
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 8.0.0 | 2024-09-30 2023 added (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14399 |
| 7.0.0 | 2023-10-02 2022 added https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14191 |
| 6.0.0 | 2022-07-11 2021 added https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13952 |
| 5.0.0 | 2021-09-30 2020 added https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13811 |
| 4.0.0 | 2020-05-18 2019 added https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13524 |
| 3.0.0 | 2019-06-14 2018 added https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13311 |
| 2.0.0 | 2019-01-14 2016 and 2017 added https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13128 |
| 1.0.0 | 2016-07-25 first archive edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12570 |
Publications: Best, Heinrich; Salomo, Katja (2014): Güte und Reichweite der Messung des Rechtsextremismus im THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2000 bis 2014. Expertise für die Thüringer Staatskanzlei. Erfurt., Edinger, Michael; Hallermann, Andreas (2004): Politische Kultur in Ostdeutschland. Die Unterstützung des politischen Systems am Beispiel Thüringens.
Frankfurt a.M. u.a.: Peter Lang., Edinger, Michael; Hallermann, Andreas (2007): Politische Kultur in Thüringen – Ergebnisse des THÜRINGEN-MONITORs, in: Anselm Cypionka u.a. (Hrsg.): Perspektiven Politischer Kultur in Thüringen, Erfurt, S. 11–40., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2000: Politische Kultur im Freistaat Thüringen. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 3/1106., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2001: Jugend und Politik. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 3/1970., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2002: Familie und Politik. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 3/2882., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2003: Einstellungen zur Demokratie. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 3/3765., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2004: Gerechtigkeit und Eigenverantwortung. Einstellungen zur Reform des Sozialstaats. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 4/551., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2005: 1990–2005: Das vereinigte Deutschland im Urteil der Thüringer. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 4/1347., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2006: Thüringens Zukunft aus Bürgersicht: Erwartungen, Herausforderungen, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 4/2485., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2007: Bildung in einer sich wandelnden Gesellschaft. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 4/3860., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2008: Soziale Marktwirtschaft in Thüringen: Die Einstellungen der Bürgerinnen und Bürger. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 4/4734., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2010: Beziehungen und Verhältnis der Generationen in Thüringen. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 5/1120., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2011: Staatsaufgaben und Staatsausgaben. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 5/3396., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2012: Thüringen International: Weltoffenheit, Zuwanderung und Akzeptanz. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 5/5244., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2013: Wie leben wir? Wie wollen wir leben? – Zufriedenheit, Werte und gesellschaftliche Orientierungen der Thüringer Bevölkerung. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 5/7051., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2014: Die Thüringer als Europäer. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 6/287., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2015: Thüringen im 25. Jahr der deutschen Einheit. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 6/1347., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2016: Gemischte Gefühle: Thüringen nach der "Flüchtlingskrise". Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 6/2989., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2017: Thüringens ambivalente Mitte: Soziale Lagen und politische Einstellungen. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 6/4700., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2018: Heimat Thüringen. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 6/6383., Best, Heinrich; Miehlke, Marius; Salheiser, Axel (2018): Topografie des Rechtsextremismus und der gruppenbezogenen Menschenfeindlichkeit in Thüringen: Dokumentation und Analysen: Forschungsberricht 2018.
Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, KomRex - Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung, Demokratiebildung und gesellschaftliche Integration., Best, Heinrich (2018): Rechtsextremismus im Kontext der politischen Kultur des Freistaats Thüringen. Eine Metanalyse von Befunden der THÜRINGEN-MONITORe 2000-2017.
In: Torsten Oppelland (Hrsg.): Politik und Regieren in Thüringen. Institutionen, Strukturen und Politikfelder im 21. Jahrhundert.
Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 99-113. , Reiser, Marion; Best, Heinrich; Salheiser, Axel (2018): Gutachten zur Weiterentwicklung des Datenerhebungsdesigns des Thüringen-Monitors: Telefonische und persönlche Befragung im Vergleich. Begleitendes Methodenprojekt zum Thüringen-Monitor 2018.
Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, KomRex - Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung, Demokratiebildung und gesellschaftliche Integration., Reiser, Marion; Best, Heinrich; Salheiser, Axel; Fürnberg, Ossip; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Vogel, Lars (2019): Politische Kultur im Freistaat Thüringen : Gesundheit und Pflege in Thüringen : Ergebnisse des Thüringen-Monitors 2019.
Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, KomRex - Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung, Demokratiebildung und gesellschaftliche Integration., Reiser, Marion; Küppers, Anne; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Salheiser, Axel; Vogel, Lars (2020): Politische Kultur im Freistaat Thüringen : Die Corona-Pandemie im Thüringen : Ergebnisse des Thüringen-Monitors 2020.
Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, KomRex - Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung, Demokratiebildung und gesellschaftliche Integration., Reiser, Marion; Küppers, Anne; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Salheiser, Axel; Vogel, Lars (2021): Politische Kultur im Freistaat Thüringen: Demokratie in der Corona-Pandemie. Ergebnisse des Thüringen-Monitors 2021.
Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, KomRex - Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung, Demokratiebildung und gesellschaftliche Integration., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2019: Gesundheit und Pflege in Thüringen. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 7/46., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2020: Die Corona-Pandemie in Thüringen. Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 7/3054., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2021: Demokratie in der Corona-Pandemie: Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 7/4518., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2022: Politische Kultur in Stadt und Land: Drucksache des Thüringer Landtags 7/8028., Reiser, Marion; Küppers, Anne; Brandy, Volker; Hebenstreit, Jörg; Vogel, Lars (2022): Politische Kultur in Stadt und Land : Ergebnisse des Thüringen-Monitors 2022.
Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, KomRex - Zentrum für Rechtsextremismusforschung, Demokratiebildung und gesellschaftliche Integration., THÜRINGEN-MONITOR 2023: Politische Kultur und Arbeitswelt in Zeiten von Polykrise und
Fachkräftemangel.
Study group: GESIS Community Data
Date(s) of Data Collection: 02.06.2023 - 22.08.2023
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8853 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14400
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8853 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14400
Abstract: It is a large-scale survey on the experiences and views of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex people. The survey provides comparative research on how LGBTIQ peopl ... more
Abstract: It is a large-scale survey on the experiences and views of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex people. The survey provides comparative research on how LGBTIQ peopl ... more
Date(s) of Data Collection: 02.06.2023 - 22.08.2023
Geographic coverage: Albania (AL), Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Croatia (HR), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Denmark (DK), Estonia (EE), Finland (FI), France (FR), Germany (DE), Greece (GR), Hungary (HU), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU), Malta (MT), Netherlands (NL), North Macedonia (MK), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Serbia (RS), Slovakia (SK), Slovenia (SI), Spain (ES), Sweden (SE)
Number of Units: 100577
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Number of Variables: 658
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), Vienna, Austria
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14400
Study number: ZA8853
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-10-25, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14400
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-10-25 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14400 |
Study group: Surveys from European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Variables (658)
information:Variables (658)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 22.08.2022 - 29.09.2022
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7967 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14078
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7967 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14078
Abstract: Since 24 February 2022, the European Union has experienced a mass influx of people fleeing the war in Ukraine. In response, the European Council activated the Temporary P ... more
Abstract: Since 24 February 2022, the European Union has experienced a mass influx of people fleeing the war in Ukraine. In response, the European Council activated the Temporary P ... more
Content: 1. Questionnaire adults:
Living in Ukraine just before the war on 24 February 2022; current country of residence; valid biometric passport; kind of problems when entering the EU; type of information received (education in the current country, employment, learning the language of the current country, accommodation, health care, psychological support services);
household composition: respondent’s sex; current marital status; family members remaining in Ukraine; frequency of contact with family members in Ukraine by different means of contact; family members in the current country;
housing: sharing housing with others; accommodation with a host or a host family; paying rent for housing; housework, care for children or older people in exchange for housing; problems with accommodation (e.g. lack of privacy, too much noise, no quiet/ separate room for children to study, etc.); satisfaction with the current accommodation;
residence and status: applied for temporary protection; current possession of a residence permit; information on the rights and benefits provided in understandable language; outcome of temporary protection application; applied for asylum; outcome of the asylum application; future plans;
education: attendance of education just before leaving Ukraine; current educational attendance; mode of education; current level of education; reasons for not attending school; assessment of skills in the language of the country of residence; attendance of national language courses; satisfaction with the current education;
employment: looking for work in the country of residence; problems in accessing employment; currently in paid work; if not currently in paid work: in paid work in the current country since leaving Ukraine; main reasons for not working; starting new job or business in the current country; kind of employment contract; correspondence between current job and level of education; experienced problems at work (e.g., labour exploitation); sector of economy of labour exploitation;
economic situation: types of income; actors providing assistance; possession of a bank account in the current country; ability of household to make ends meet;
living situation: feeling of unfairly treatment; current state of mind (satisfaction with life);
health: subjective assessment of own health condition; longstanding illness or health problem; limitation in daily activities in the past six months because of a health problem; problems when using or trying to use health care services; using of health care services in the country; frequency of different feelings since arrival in the current country;
violence: experiences with various forms of violence in Ukraine since the war started in February 2022 and in the EU; reporting any of these incidents that happened during the time in the EU to the police or to any other authority or organisation; consequences (result) of the incidents experienced since the war started in February 2022; medical or psychological support received;
demographic characteristics: main activity status/ employment situation just before leaving Ukraine; urbanization; main language(s) spoken at home; comfort scale about having neighbours with different backgrounds (e. g. a person with disabilities, someone from Russia, etc.); belonging to minority groups; where did the respondent hear about the survey; agreement with participation of children.
2. Questionnaire children:
Parent’s consent; residing in Ukraine before the war; current country of residence; valid biometric passport; kind of problems when entering the EU; type of information received (education in the current country, employment, learning the language of the current country, accommodation, health care, psychological support services);
household composition in Ukraine just before the war started; family members co-fleeing Ukraine; family members remaining in Ukraine; frequency of contact with family members in Ukraine by different means of contact; family members in the current country; legal guardian in the current country;
housing: sharing housing with others; accommodation with a host or a host family; paying rent for housing; housework, care for children or older people in exchange for housing; problems with accommodation (e.g. lack of privacy, too much noise, no quiet/ separate room for children to study, etc.); satisfaction with the current accommodation;
residence and status: applied for temporary protection; current possession of a residence permit; future plans;
education: school attendance just before leaving Ukraine; current school attendance; mode of education; current level of education; reasons for not attending school; teachers speaking the language that the respondent mainly speaks at home; study materials in the language that the respondent mainly speaks at home; assessment of skills in the language of the country of residence; attendance of a country language course; satisfaction with the current education/ training;
employment: looking for work in the country of residence; problems in accessing employment; currently in paid work; if not currently in paid work: in paid work in the current country since leaving Ukraine; starting new job or business in the current country; kind of employment contract; correspondence between current job and level of education; experienced problems at work (e.g., labour exploitation); sector of economy of labour exploitation;
economic situation: ability of household to make ends meet;
living situation: possession of items (computer/ tablet, internet (at home), mobile phone or smartphone); frequency of contact with people in the current country of residence (friends from school and with friends from outside of school); participation in different activities in leisure; feeling of unfairly treatment; current state of mind (satisfaction with life);
health: subjective assessment of own health condition; longstanding illness or health problem; problems when using or trying to use health care services; using of health care services in the country; frequency of different feelings since arrival in the current country; speaking about problems with whom; frequency of using support services (school counsellor, psychologist outside the school);
violence: experiences with various forms of violence in Ukraine since the war started in February 2022 and in the EU; reporting any of these incidents that happened during the time in the EU to the police or to any other authority or organisation; consequences (result) of the incidents experienced since the war started in February 2022; medical or psychological support received;
demographic characteristics: sex; urbanization; main language(s) spoken at home; comfort scale about having neighbours with different backgrounds (e. g. a person with disabilities, someone from Russia, etc.); belonging to minority groups; where did the respondent hear about the survey; influence of other persons present during the interview.
Recoded variables: Respondent’s age; number of children under respondent’s responsibility; length of stay in current country; citizenship(s) possessed; where does the respondent currently live; highest level of education completed; minority in terms of racial or ethnic origin, or religion; respondent considers being LGBT; activity limitation; accommodation type.
Additionally coded were: random respondent ID; adult or children; respondent ID of the person by whom child was referred to the questionnaire; current country of residence; last page; start language; country in which the respondent is currently staying; weighting factors.
Topics: DEMOGRAPHY (POPULATION, VITAL STATISTICS, AND CENSUSES), Migration, SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND GROUPINGS, Minorities
Date(s) of Data Collection: 22.08.2022 - 29.09.2022
Geographic coverage: Bulgaria (BG), Czech Republic (CZ), Germany (DE), Estonia (EE), Spain (ES), Hungary (HU), Italy (IT), Poland (PL), Romania (RO), Slovakia (SK)
Universe: The survey universe are people who at the time of the survey:
- were at least 12 years old*;
- were staying in a country selected for the survey (even if only passing through it at the time);
- were Ukrainian citizens or residents, including EU or third-country nationals, who resided permanently in Ukraine prior to 24 February 2022; and
- have arrived in the EU shortly before or after 24 February 2022.
* Only respondents aged at least 16 years could fill in the survey using the survey link that was distributed in the survey promotion campaign. Children aged 12-15 years could fill in the survey only if they received a survey link from their legal guardian that has filled in the survey.
Number of Units: 14685
Sampling Procedure: • Non-probability;
The online survey on persons displaced from Ukraine was an open online opt-in survey. This means that, unlike in surveys with probability sampling, respondents included themselves in the sample. This design was chosen because at the time of the survey it was not possible to obtain a representative random sample of people displaced from Ukraine across the EU. This was due to the fact that there were no reliable sampling frames in the survey countries and no information about the target population in terms of its size, characteristics, and composition (see also the notes on weighting in the "Further notes" box).
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Data Collector: EU Fundamental Rights Agency
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 383
Notes: The dataset includes information on the level of the respondent. The dataset consists of one row per unit, which includes information about the respondent. Each respondent has a unique random identifier RESPONDENT_ID. Respondents aged 12-15 years could fill in the survey only with the consent of their legal guardian. For children that were referred to the survey, the variable adultReferrer provides the RESPONDENT_ID of their legal guardian.
Weighting: In the absence of reliable official population statistics on the number and structure of the target population, the estimates of the sizes of the target population were used to provide the basis for a post-stratification weighting. To account for (estimated) population structure in terms of gender, age and country, the combined weight TENWEIGHT can be used for weighted analysis on country as well as on survey level.
The dataset was subjected to a detailed assessment of confidentiality. The answer categories of some variables (for example HH02, Children, EntCountry or DE02) were aggregated into broader ranges or groups to ensure the anonymity of respondents. Some variables are not published in the anonymized dataset, for example the answers in the open text field.
There were two versions of the questionnaire – for adults and for children. The version of the questionnaire for adults was provided to respondents aged 18+ years. Respondents aged 12–17 received a shorter, age-appropriate version of the adult questionnaire, with several child-specific questions. Children aged 16–17 received relevant questions from the adult questionnaire. Some variables have different names for children and adult respondents. This is because some questions were formulated (slightly) differently for adults and children. For example, in case of question SatAcc, the variable SatAcc_SatAcc contains the answers of respondents who received the adult questionnaire while variable SarAcc_SQ001 contains the answers of respondents who received the child questionnaire.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), Vienna, Austria
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.4232/1.14078
Study number: ZA7967
Contributor, Institution, Role: Fric, Karel - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights - DataCurator
Publisher: GESIS
External links: project page at FRA
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2023-04-28, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14078
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2023-04-28 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14078 |
Publications: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA):
Fleeing Ukraine : Displaced people´s experiences in the EU.
https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2023/ukraine-survey
Study group: Surveys from European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Publications (1)
information:Publications (1)
Date(s) of Data Collection: 30.05.2022 - 28.07.2022
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8826 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14419
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8826 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14419
Other Title (type): Triggerpunkte - Neue Ungleichheiten, neue Spaltungen? (Subtitle)
Abstract: The survey Inequality and Conflict was conducted by infas on behalf of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. During the survey period from 30.05.2022 to 28.07.2022, the German- ... more
Abstract: The survey Inequality and Conflict was conducted by infas on behalf of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. During the survey period from 30.05.2022 to 28.07.2022, the German- ... more
Content: Perception of problems: importance of various issues for Germany (income and wealth inequality, influx of migrants, discrimination against sexual minorities, climate change, inequality between men and women); perception of conflict between different groups in Germany (between rich and poor, between migrants and Germans, between sexual minorities and the majority society, between those who pay attention to climate protection and those who do not care so much about the environment, between East Germans and West Germans);
Social inequality: Agreement with various statements on social inequality (differences between income and wealth in Germany are too great, not enough respect in society for ordinary people who work honestly and hard, what you achieve in life depends on your own efforts); agreement with statements on unemployment and poverty (Hartz 4 rates should be significantly increased, the long-term unemployed should be obliged to do community work, poverty is a question of motivation and willingness to perform and cannot be combated with money alone); agreement with various statements on the role of the state (the state should reduce income disparities more than it has done so far, increasing inheritance tax for large inheritances makes sense in order to reduce social inequalities in Germany, investment in the education system is more important than in supporting the unemployed);
Living situation: assessment of own economic situation; assessment of own share received (relative deprivation); lifestyle: lifestyle and interests (high standard of living, expensive menu in a restaurant, art and culture, sophisticated books, always something going on, new challenges, self-realization, house and home, security and stability, traditions and customs);
Attitudes towards migration (nowadays there are too many migrants in Germany, equal rights as natives only for migrants who make an effort and integrate, the claim that migrants are often criminals is often based on xenophobia); opinion on the effects of immigration on Germany (migration is good for the economy, enriching for cultural life, too little for locals because too much is spent on migrants, foreigners in their own country due to migrants); approval of upper limits on the admission of refugees from the Arab and African regions and from Ukraine;
Media use: Frequency of use of various media for information on current social issues (television or radio, printed newspapers or magazines, newspapers or magazines on the Internet, social networks or messenger services); regular use of social media (Facebook, Twitter, Telegram or WhatsApp, YouTube);
Attitudes towards minorities: Gays and lesbians (homosexuals are still discriminated against and disadvantaged in Germany, good that marriages between homosexuals are allowed, equal adoption rights for gay and lesbian couples as heterosexual couples, homosexual persons should appear in school materials to reduce prejudices), transgender persons (persons with changed gender should be recognized as normal, in Germany many exaggerate their tolerance towards lesbians, gays and transgender persons, gender-appropriate language important for equality); men and women (gender quotas for job appointments, sexism discussion is exaggerated); agreement with statements on racism (people with black skin are discriminated against in Germany, the topic of racism takes up too much space in the media, new street names because of racism is exaggerated); agreement with statements on East Germans and West Germans (East Germans and West Germans still differ in many ways, the life achievements of East Germans should be recognized more, more political measures for the promotion and equality of East Germans); party preference (Sunday question), parties that are not electable (negative voter potential);
Memberships and involvement: regular involvement in an association, a political party, a trade union or a church congregation;
Climate change: Attitude towards climate change (very concerned about climate change, demand to live environmentally conscious is an imposition); attitude towards measures against climate change (more wind turbines should be erected for climate protection, climate change can be overcome by technological progress, risk prosperity if we put everything to the test because of climate change, before we change our lives further because of climate protection, other countries should follow suit); opinion on the distribution of the burden in climate policy (It is fair if those who have a lot contribute the most to overcoming the climate crisis, environmentally friendly lifestyles are demanded above all by those who can afford organic products); assessment of the climate of opinion in Germany (A lot is changing in society: Difficult to keep up, you are no longer allowed to say anything critical about migrants and homosexuals, current political discussion often makes me angry); sympathy towards people from certain social groups (climate activists from Fridays for Future, migration opponents, feminists, lobbyists for large corporations, SUV drivers, trans people, Arab immigrants, long-term unemployed, supporters of the Greens, supporters of the AfD).
Demography: sex; age (open and grouped); region of residence in November 1989 (respondent and parents); federal state, parents´ country of birth (migration background); degree of urbanization of place of residence; highest general school-leaving qualification; other highest school-leaving qualification (open); highest vocational qualification; other highest vocational qualification (open); former major field of study (open); at least one parent has a degree from a university or university of applied sciences; employment status, current occupational activity and occupation stated, current occupational position and characteristics; number of employees of self-employed persons; land area of farmers; supervisory function; number of persons currently supervised, previous employment; previous professional activity and occupation mentioned; previous professional position and characteristics; previous number of employees of self-employed persons; previous land area of farmers; previous supervisory function; number of persons previously supervised; marital status; household size; number of children in the household; net household income (open and grouped); household assets (grouped).
Information on partner: employment status; current occupation and occupation stated; current occupational position and characteristics; number of employees of self-employed persons; land area of farmers; supervisory function; number of persons currently supervised; previous employment; employment of deceased partner; previous occupation and occupation stated; previous occupational position and characteristics; previous number of employees of self-employed persons; previous land area of farmers; previous supervisory function; number of persons previously supervised.
Additionally coded were: Interview number; interview date; interview termination; interview duration without intro in minutes; occupation coding according to ISCO (International Standard Classification of Occupations) 2008; class model according to Oesch; socio-economic classification according to European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC); weighting factor; household net income imputation; household wealth imputation; household net income indicator; household wealth indicator.
Topics: SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND GROUPINGS, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Minorities, Economic conditions and indicators, Information society, Environment and conservation, Political behaviour and attitudes, Migration
Date(s) of Data Collection: 30.05.2022 - 28.07.2022
Geographic coverage: Germany (de)
Universe: German-speaking population aged 16 and over in private households
Number of Units: 2530
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
- Dual-frame sampling approach: Separate selection frames for mobile numbers and landlines using the Gabler-Häder method
- For the selection frame for landline numbers, number masters were generated on the basis of the numbers available in telephone directories and directories and others were provided by the Federal Network Agency. The number masters were supplemented by numbers between 00 and 99.
Two-stage drawing of the landline sample
Primary Sampling Unit (PSU): Random selection of telephone households stratified by combination of district and BIK municipality size class
Secondary Sampling Unit (SSU): Random selection of the person to be interviewed. The birthday selection procedure was used here; the respondents were asked who in the household was at least 16 years old and whose birthday was the most recent
- The starting point for generating mobile numbers is the list of number blocks issued by the Federal Network Agency. The last six digits of the number are generated.
- Single-stage drawing of mobile phone numbers: As the mobile phone sample was a sample of individuals, a single-stage draw could be made from the set of generated mobile phone numbers. Regional stratification was not possible.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI);
Data Collector: infas Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH, Bonn
Analysis System(s): Stata, SPSS
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 214
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Mau, Steffen - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Lux, Thomas - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Westheuser, Linus - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14419
Study number: ZA8826
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-11-22, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14419
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-11-22 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14419 |
Publications: Mau, S., Lux, T., & Westheuser, L. (2023). Triggerpunkte Konsens und Konflikt in der Gegenwartsgesellschaft. Berlin Suhrkamp Verlag., Schiel, Stefan; Link, Sebastian; Schumacher, Dennis: Methodenbericht : Telefonische Bevölkerungsbefragung zum Thema „Neue Ungleichheiten, neue Spaltungen?“
Bonn: infas Institut für Sozialwissenschaft GmbH, September 2022
Study group: GESIS Community Data
European Commission, Brussels; Directorate General Communication, COMM.A.3 ‘Media Monitoring and Eurobarometer’; European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.11.2021 - 02.12.2021
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7847 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14063
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7847 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14063
Other Title (type): Parlemeter 2021, and Integration of Immigrants in the European Union (Subtitle)
Abstract: Since the early 1970s the European Commission´s Standard & Special Eurobarometer are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries. P ... more
Abstract: Since the early 1970s the European Commission´s Standard & Special Eurobarometer are regularly monitoring the public opinion in the European Union member countries. P ... more
Content: Topics: 1. Parlemeter 2021: recent reception of media reports on the European Parliament; image of the European Parliament; desired importance of the role of the European Parliament; preferred issues to be a main priority of the European Parliament; prioritized values to be defended by the European Parliament; attitude towards the European Union; assessment of the own country’s membership in the EU as a good thing; benefits from the EU membership and reasons for benefit; image of the EU; development of this image over the last year; self-rated knowledge about the work of the European Parliament; additional information desired on the following aspects: activities regarding the protection of democracy and the rule of law, possibilities of citizens’ participation in decisions taken at European level, main priorities of the European Parliament, rights of a citizen of the EU, practical activities of MEPs of the own country in the European Parliament, practical consequences of European policies and decisions on the own country, practical consequences of European policies and decisions on personal life, EU activities in the own region and country, EU activities to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic, how EU funds are practically spent in the own country, other, no additional information desired; preferred actions to learn more about the activities of national MEPs: personal meetings at events in the own region, interact on social media, more media presence of the MEPs, more information about their roles and activities in the European Parliament, address a MEP directly on a specific issue and receive a concrete answer, visit the European Parliament and meet the MEPs, no desire to get engaged with the activities of the national MEPs, other; most urgent measures to be taken by the EU to tackle climate change and its consequences; likelihood to vote in the next European Parliament elections; personal feeling of involvement in society matters; level of interest in European affairs; personal importance of the own country being a member state of the European Union.
2. Integration of immigrants in the European Union: estimated share of legal immigrants compared to the share of illegal immigrants in the own country; assessment of legal immigration from outside the EU as opportunity or as a problem for own country; proportion of immigrants in the total national population (in percent); self-rated knowledge about immigration and integration matters; most important source of information on immigration and integration related matters; frequency of interaction with immigrants; comfort with immigrants as: own manager, own work colleague, own neighbour, own doctor, own family member, own friend; friends and / or family members who are immigrants living in respondent’s country; success of integration of immigrants living in: own city, own country; development of the following aspects regarding the situation of legal immigrants over the last ten years: likelihood of male immigrants to have a job, likelihood of female immigrants to have a job, education levels of adult immigrants with long-term residence, education outcomes of children of immigrants, poverty rate among immigrants; importance of each of the following aspects with regard to successful integration into the country of residence: share cultural traditions, feel like a member of society, speak national language, accept values and norms of society, participate in an association or organisation or take part in local elections, contributing to welfare system, have friends, sufficient educational qualifications, acquire national citizenship; assessment of the following obstacles to successful integration: discrimination, limited efforts of immigrants to integrate, access to long term residence permits, finding a job, limited access to education as well as to healthcare and social protection, limited interaction between immigrants and national citizens, negative portrayal in the media, bringing family members, finding adequate accommodation, high concentration of immigrants in certain areas; importance of each of the following actors for successful integration: immigrants, citizens, national government, EU institutions, local and regional authorities, media, educational institutions, civil society actors, employers; responsibility of immigrants and / or of society; attitude towards the following statements on integration: necessary investment for own country, sufficient measures of national government; importance of the issue of integration of immigrants from outside the EU for national government; preferred importance of the issue of integration of immigrants from outside the EU on the national government policy agenda; importance of taking into account the integration needs of immigrants with regard to measures to fight the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the own country; country of birth of: respondent, mother of respondent, father of respondent, grandmother on mother´s side, grandfather on mother´s side, grandmother on father´s side, grandfather on father´s side.
Demography: nationality; age; optimism about the future of the EU; marital status; age at end of education; highest completed level of full time education; sex; occupation; professional position; employment status; type of community; household composition and household size; self-reported belonging to the working class, the middle class or the upper class of society; frequency of discussions about political matters on national, European, and local level; left-right self-placement; general direction things are going in: own country, EU, USA; satisfaction with democracy in the own country and in the EU; own voice counts in the own country and in the EU; own country’s voice counts in the EU; own a mobile phone and fixed (landline) phone; financial difficulties during the last year; expected development in the next year: personal living conditions, national economy; internet use (at home, at work, at school).
Additionally coded was: respondent ID; country; questionnaire split; mode of interview; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; number of persons present during the interview; respondent cooperation; size of locality; language of the interview; region; weighting factor.
Topics: International politics and organisations, Political behaviour and attitudes, Minorities, Equality, inequality and social exclusion
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.11.2021 - 02.12.2021
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.11.2021 - 02.12.2021, total, 02.11.2021 - 02.12.2021, Belgium, 03.11.2021 - 28.11.2021, Bulgaria, 04.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Czechia, 01.11.2021 - 26.11.2021, Denmark, 02.11.2021 - 02.12.2021, Germany, 03.11.2021 - 28.11.2021, Estonia, 03.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Ireland, 02.11.2021 - 26.11.2021, Greece, 03.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Spain, 03.11.2021 - 27.11.2021, France, 02.11.2021 - 24.11.2021, Croatia, 03.11.2021 - 26.11.2021, Italy, 01.11.2021 - 28.11.2021, Cyprus, 03.11.2021 - 17.11.2021, Latvia, 03.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Lithuania, 02.11.2021 - 26.11.2021, Luxembourg, 03.11.2021 - 19.11.2021, Hungary, 02.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Malta, 02.11.2021 - 23.11.2021, Netherlands, 02.11.2021 - 21.11.2021, Austria, 02.11.2021 - 28.11.2021, Poland, 02.11.2021 - 28.11.2021, Portugal, 02.11.2021 - 26.11.2021, Romania, 02.11.2021 - 25.11.2021, Slovenia, 02.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Slovakia, 04.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Finland, 02.11.2021 - 29.11.2021, Sweden
Geographic coverage: Austria (AT), Belgium (BE), Bulgaria (BG), Cyprus (CY), Czech Republic (CZ), Germany (DE), Denmark (DK), Estonia (EE), Spain (ES), Finland (FI), France (FR), Greece (GR), Croatia (HR), Hungary (HU), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU), Latvia (LV), Malta (MT), Netherlands (NL), Poland (PL), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Sweden (SE), Slovenia (SI), Slovakia (SK)
Universe: Population of the respective nationalities of the European Union Member States and other EU nationals, resident in each of the 27 Member States and aged 15 years and over.
Number of Units: 26496
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
Please consult the additional information in the Technical Specifications in the basic questionnaire.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI)
• Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Please consult the additional information in the Technical Specifications in the basic questionnaire.
Data Collector: Mobiel Centre Market Research, Almere, Belgium;
Kantar TNS BBSS, Sofia, Bulgaria;
Kantar Czechia, Prague, Czech Republic;
Kantar GALLUP A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark;
Kantar Deutschland, Munich, Germany;
Norstat Estonia, Tallinn, Estonia;
B and A Research, Dublin, Ireland;
Kantar Greece, Athens, Greece;
TNS Investigación de Mercados y Opinión, Madrid, Spain;
Kantar Public France, Montrouge, France;
Kantar Italia, Milan, Italy;
CYMAR Market Research, Nicosia, Cyprus;
Kantar TNS Latvia, Riga, Latvia;
TNS LT, Vilnius, Lithuania;
Kantar Belgium, Brussels, Luxembourg;
Kantar Hoffmann Kft, Budapest, Hungary;
MISCO International, Valletta, Malta;
Kantar Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
Das Österreichische Gallup Institut, Vienna, Austria;
Kantar Polska, Warsaw, Poland;
Marktest – Marketing, Organização e Formação, Lisbon, Portugal;
Centrul Pentru Studierea Opiniei si Pietei CSOP, Bucharest, Romania;
Mediana DOO, Ljubljana, Slovenia;
Kantar Czechia, Prague, Slovakia;
Kantar TNS Oy, Helsinki, Finland;
Kantar Sifo, Stockholm and Gothenburg, Sweden;
HENDAL, Zagreb, Croatia;
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 362
Notes: This wave of the Eurobarometer was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. This necessitated a number of adjustments to the data collection process. Please consult the information referring to this in the Technical Specifications in the basic questionnaire.
Question module QA “Parlemeter 2021” partly replicates questions asked in the context of Eurobarometer 95.1 (ZA7781) and Eurobarometer 94.2 (ZA7750).
Question module QB “Integration of Immigrants in the European Union” partly replicates questions asked in the context of Eurobarometer 88.2 (ZA6927).
Data for protocol variables p8 (postal code), p9 (sample point number), and p10 (interviewer number) have not been made available.
The variable names of the standard demography variables have been changed according to the usual Eurobarometer nomenclature.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: European Commission, Brussels; Directorate General Communication, COMM.A.3 ‘Media Monitoring and Eurobarometer’ - , European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Opinion Monitoring Unit -
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.4232/1.14063
Study number: ZA7847
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ Int. Umfrageprogramm bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2023-01-26, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14063
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2023-01-26 Pre-release (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14063 |
Errata in current version:
| Date | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | qa3 | Variable label for qa3 should read "EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – ROLE PREFERENCE". The variable label will be corrected with the next update. |
Publications: European Parliament:
Parlemeter 2021. Defending Democracy | Empowering Citizens.
Conducted by Kantar Public at the request of the European Parliament. Survey co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM ‘Media monitoring and Eurobarometer’ Unit) and the European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM “Public Opinion Monitoring Unit” (POMU)). Brussels, January 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2861/825364, European Commission:
Special Eurobarometer 519. Integration of Immigrants in the European Union.
Conducted by Kantar Public at the request of the European Commission Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs (DG HOME). Survey co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication (DG COMM ‘Media monitoring and Eurobarometer’ Unit). Brussels, June 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2837/672792
Study group: EB - Standard and Special Eurobarometer
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.02.2021 - 31.08.2021
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8770 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14227
GESIS, Cologne. ZA8770 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14227
Abstract: The Roma Survey 2021 makes part of a series of surveys carried out by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency that assess the progress towards Roma inclusion in selected Member ... more
Abstract: The Roma Survey 2021 makes part of a series of surveys carried out by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency that assess the progress towards Roma inclusion in selected Member ... more
Content: Housing and living standard: length of living in the current accommodation; reasons for moving; number of rooms in the accommodation; housing tenure; facilities in the accommodation; available services in the neighbourhood; financial capacity to keep the house warm; kind of problems with the accommodation; inability to pay certain costs on time due to financial difficulties in the last 12 months; reasons if the household has been forced to leave the accommodation in the past five years; items possessed in the household; respondent would like to have on of those items but cannot afford it; ability of the household to afford certain expenses; frequency of food deprivation in the last month; material deprivation of child/ children (e.g. have some new clothes, have fruits and vegetables once a day, have books at home suitable for their age); ability of the respondent to afford certain expenses (e.g. participation in a leisure activity that costs money; possession of a bank account.
Unemployment: year when last job finished; name or title of last job; unemployment registration; currently looking for work; main reasons for not looking for work.
Work: name or title of main current job, kind of employment contract in main job.
Health: subjective assessment of own health condition; longstanding illness or health problem; extent of limitation in daily activities in the past six months; health insurance coverage; additional health insurance; need of medical examination or treatment in the past 12 months; unmet need for medical examination or treatment in past 12 months; main reason why the respondent did not have a medical examination or treatment;
Pregnancy (women only): ever given birth; age when giving birth for the first time; number of children born; number of children still alive.
Rights awareness: extent of feeling excluded from society; awareness of support organisations in the country; awareness of certain equality bodies in the country; awareness of anti-discrimination law in the country; how worried about experiencing harassment in public because of own Roma background (verbal insults or offensive comments, inappropriate staring, offensive gestures, a physical attack); avoidance of certain places for fear of being treated badly.
Experience of discrimination: at risk of discrimination in the past five years and in the past twelve months: ever looked for work, ever been in work, ever used any healthcare services, ever tried to rent or buy an apartment or a house, ever been in contact with anyone from school/ college/ university either as a parent/ guardian or as a student, ever been in contact with administrative offices or public services, ever tried to enter a nightclub, a bar, a restaurant or hotel, used public transport, been in a shop or tried to enter a shop; reasons for experiences of discrimination when looking for work in the country in the past five years and in the past twelve months (skin colour or racial origin, Roma background, religion or religious beliefs, age, sex/gender; disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, other, haven’t felt discriminated); reasons for discrimination in the past five years and in the past twelve months when in work, when used health care services, when tried to rent or buy an apartment or a house, when been in contact with anyone from school/ college/ university, when been in contact with administrative offices or public services, when tried to enter a night club, a bar, a restaurant or hotel, used public transport, been in a shop; frequency of discrimination in the past twelve months; discrimination was reported; person or institution to whom the incident was reported; reasons for not reporting discrimination; experiences of discriminatory job adverts that excluded or discourages applicants with a Roma background in the past five years; specific experiences of discrimination at work because of own Roma background in the past five years (tasks below qualification, denied promotion, not allowed to join a trade union, not allowed to take time off for a very important religious holiday/ service/ ceremony, fired, dismissed or laid off, not allowed to take time off for private reasons such as staying home with ill child.
Specific experiences of discrimination: when trying to rent or buy an apartment or a house in the past 5 years (prevented from renting an apartment / house because of own Roma background by a private landlord and/or by officials working for public housing, prevented from buying an apartment / house by the owner or an estate agency, asked to pay a higher rent/ price/ deposit because of own Roma background, adverts for housing that excludes or discouraged applicants with a Roma background; parent or guardian of a child or children within national compulsory school age range; negative experiences of a child or children in school because of their Roma background in the past twelve months (someone made offensive or threatening comments, physical abuse (e.g. hitting, hair-pulling, kicking, etc.), being excluded (isolated) at playtime or from social events or circles of friends); experiences of being stopped, searched or questioned by police because of own Roma background in the past five years and in the past twelve months; context where the last experience with the police happened (car, motorbike, bicycle, public transport, on the street, as a pedestrian, other); last experience of being stopped related to ethnic or immigrant background; police requests during last experience of being stopped (asked questions, asked for identity papers, asked for driving license or vehicle documents, searched the respondent or the car/ vehicle, gave some advice or warned about behaviour, did an alcohol or drug test, fined the respondent, arrested the respondent or took him to a police station, took money or something in form of a bribe, other); degree of respect shown by police during last experience of being stopped, respondent reported disrespectful treatment by police.
Experiences of harassment: specific experiences of harassment in the past five years (offensive or threatening comments, violence, offensive gestures, offensive or threatening emails or text messages, offensive comments on the internet); specific experiences of harassment because of Roma background; frequency of specific experiences of harassment in the past twelve months; frequency of such incidents in the past twelve months because of Roma background, last incident of harassment related to ethnic or immigrant background among those mentioned; identity of perpetrator of last incident of harassment; ethnic background and sex of the perpetrator of last incident of harassment; sexual nature of last incident of harassment; place of last incident of harassment; reported last incident of harassment and person or institution to whom the incident was reported; reasons for not reporting the last incident of harassment; degree of satisfaction with handling of the complaint by the police.
Experiences of violence: experience of physical attacks in the past five years; specific experiences of violence because of Roma background; frequency of experiences of violence in the past twelve months for any reason; frequency of experiences of violence related to ethnic background in the past twelve months; identity of perpetrator of the last incident of violence; ethnic background and sex of the perpetrator of last incident of violence; sexual nature of last incident of violence; place of last incident of violence; reported last incident of violence and person or institution to whom the incident was reported; reasons for not reporting the last incident of hate-motivated violence; degree of satisfaction with handling of the complaint by the police; impact of the hate crime experience on health and well-being.
Migration plans: consideration to move to another country in the future; country to which might move in the future; reasons for wanting to live in another country.
Religion and language: religion; main language(s) spoken at home; self-assessment of proficiency in survey country’s national language (speaking, reading, writing).
Intergroup relations: friends with another ethnic minority background than the respondent; friends without a minority background; friends with a different religion; ethnic or immigrant background of residents of the neighbourhood; acceptance of neighbours with different backgrounds (comfort-scale: a person with a different religion, a person who is Roma, a person of another ethnic minority background, someone who doesn’t have an ethnic minority background, a disabled person, a gay, lesbian or bisexual person, a transgender person).
Trust and values: agreement with value statements on gender equality (Having a job is the best way for a woman to be an independent person, both the husband and wife should contribute to household income, men should take as much responsibility as women for the home and children, it is important that both girls and boys stay in education for the same length of time); trust in institutions (parliament, legal system, police, politicians, political parties, the European Parliament, the local (municipal)authorities in the place of living.
Active citizenship: actions with political connotations taken in the past twelve months (liked or followed a political campaign on the internet, signed a petition on paper or online, taken part in a public demonstration); vote in the last local (municipal) elections and in the national/general elections in the country; ever used the assistance of a health mediator when going to the doctor; assistance of a Roma teaching assistant at school for children in household.
Household income: types of income obtained by the household in the past twelve months; main source of income of the household; household combined net monthly income converted to Euros; goods obtained in exchange for work in the past twelve months; ability of household to make ends meet; belonging to other minority groups (a religious minority, a minority in terms of disability, of gender identity or gender expression, a minority in terms of sexual orientation or other group.
COVID-19: situations experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic or coronavirus pandemic outbreak (income decreased, kept working but less hours than before, temporarily lost job and returned to same job after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, permanently lost job, had to work despite being concerned about contracting COVID-19 when at work, could not get a medical examination or treatment when really needed, not allowed to leave the area or the dwelling of living even for work or shopping because of a lockdown (quarantine measures), increased tensions between household members, increased prejudice, intolerance or violence because of being a Roma); children´s school was closed; school organized distance learning during the COVID-19; child had difficulties accessing distance learning.
Demography: number of persons living in the household; age of respondent and household members; age (grouped); sex, employment situation; form of employment; country of birth; year of immigration; work in the last four weeks; highest level of completed education; years spent in education; current attendance of school or vocational training; main reason for not continuing school; relationship with respondent; current marital status; age at first marriage.
Information on children: regular attendance of childcare, current school attendance; attendance of special school; reasons for not going to school; number of Roma classmates; number of Roma schoolmates; child labour in the last four weeks; nature of child labour; compensation of child labour.
Information on respondent’s parents: biological mother is still alive; age of biological mother; biological father is still alive; age of biological father.
Additionally coded: country of interview; interview number; interview duration in seconds; respondent / other household member; personal ID; household ID; degree of urbanization; type of dwelling; share of Roma who felt discriminated against in the past 12 months because of being Roma; at risk of poverty; children aged less than 18 years who are at risk of poverty; share of people living in household in severe material deprivation; children aged less than18 years living in household with severe material deprivation; share of people who felt discriminated against (in any area) in the past 12 months and reported the last incident of discrimination because of being Roma; share of children in the age between 3 years and compulsory school who attend early childhood education; share of people aged 20-24 with completed at least upper secondary education; share of children; share of children between 6 to 15 years attending schools where all or most of schoolmates are Roma as reported bey the respondent; share of people who self-declared their main activity status as paid work (20-64 years; share of young people with current main activity in neither employment, education nor training; share of people living in housing deprivation; share of people living in overcrowded household; share of people living in households without tap water inside the dwelling; experienced hate-motivated harassment (overall 5 acts) because of being Roma in the twelve months before the survey; experienced violence related to being Roma in the past twelve months; at least one person in the household has gone to bed hungry in the past month because there was not enough money for food; Roma aged 0 to 17 years living in a household where at least one person has gone to bed hungry in the past month because there was not enough money for food; people living in household that is able to make ends meet with (great) difficulties; Roma respondents aged 16 and over who do not have a bank account; Roma aged 16 and over who did not report the most recent incident or harassment because of being Roma (of all people who experienced harassment); share of Roma respondents who declared that they have not reported the last incident of physical attack which they experienced in the past five years because of being Roma; share of people aged 16 and over who had heard of at least one equality body; share of persons who tend to trust the police; share or persons who tend to trust the judicial system; share of Roma children of compulsory age (5-18 who attend education; early levers from education and training; discrimination in the past 12 months because of being Roma when being in contact with anyone from school/college/university either as a parent/ guardian or as a student; share of persons aged 30-34 who have completed tertiary education; prevalence of offensive or threatening comments to children in person (due to their being Roma) while in school in the past twelve months; discrimination in the past twelve months because of being Roma when at work and when looking at work; share of persons assessing their health in genera las very good or good; share of Roma aged 16 and over with medical insurance coverage; discrimination in the past twelve months because of being Roma when using health care services; share of Roma living in households having neither toilet, nor shower, nor bathroom inside the dwelling; share of Roma living in a household that in the past five years has ever been forced to leave the accommodation or halting site – eviction; share of people aged 16 and over who have felt discriminated against due to their being Roma in the past five years when looking for housing; share of people living in a local area with pollution, grime or other environmental problems; weight; age groups; age groups children before the age of 16; age groups employment age 20-64 years; household with and without children; household with or without children, household type, work intensity in categories (percentage of household members in working age in paid work); married before the age of 18; share of Roma in the neighbourhood.
Interviewer rating: respondent received a financial (or other) incentive for participating in the interview; respondent’s command of country language; language of in which the interview was conducted; respondent’s cooperation; respondent’s understanding of questions; reasons for misunderstandings; respondent’s interest in the topic; respondent’s honesty; place of interview; number of people present during the interview; people present during the interview; influence of the other people present during the interview; parts of the questionnaire with presence or participation of other people; presence of another interviewer or mediator; use of the Romani glossary; characteristics of the neighbourhood.
Topics: Economic conditions and indicators, EDUCATION, General health and well-being, Employment, Crime and law enforcement, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Minorities, Cultural and national identity
Date(s) of Data Collection: 01.02.2021 - 31.08.2021
Geographic coverage: Czech Republic (CZ), Spain (ES), Greece (GR), Hungary (HU), Croatia (HR), Italy (IT), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), North Macedonia (MK), Serbia (RS)
Universe: Self-identified Roma population and all individuals that identify as a member of one of the groups subsumed under the umbrella term ‘Roma’ aged 16 and above living in Croatia, Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Portugal, Romania and Spain, North Macedonia and Serbia.
Number of Units: 28673
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Multistage;
The target population is considered ‘hard to reach’ for survey research, due to the absence of sampling frames – there is no register data available on the Roma population in any of the countries. An area sampling frame was established at the level of Primary Sampling units. For the primary sampling units (usually municipalities or provinces) there was either census data on the size of the Roma population available or alternative sources, such as estimated from Roma associations were used. Following a mapping of the Roma population in the sampled Primary Sampling Units they were partitioned into smaller secondary sampling units, to ensure a sufficient number of Roma living in the area. In these secondary sampling units the households were selected via random walk and in eligible households the respondents were selected randomly from the list of eligible household members.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI);
Data Collector: Kantar Public (Kantar Belgium SA)
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 792
Notes: Weighting was used for the analysis of the survey data. The weighting accounts for design-based differences in the selection probabilities as well as differences in response rates by observable characteristics that differed significantly between the respondents and the non-respondents. Furthermore the weighting calibrates the sample of respondents to match population benchmarks on one or more of the following characteristics: region, rurality, age and gender.
Please see the “Roma Survey 2021. Technical Report” published on the website of the Fundamental Rights Agency for more detailed information on questionnaire development, sampling, fieldwork, data processing and weighting.
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), Vienna, Austria
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.4232/1.14227
Study number: ZA8770
Contributor, Institution, Role: Kling, Jaroslav - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), Vienna, Austria - ProjectManager
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2023-11-29, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14227
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2023-11-29 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14227 |
Publications: FRA (2022), Roma in 10 European countries – Main results: Roma survey 2021, Luxembourg, Publication Office. (https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2022/roma-survey-findings), FRA (2023), Roma survey 2021 – Technical report, Luxembourg, Publication office. (https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra\_uploads/fra-2023-roma-survey-2021-technical-report\_en.pdf), FRA (2023), Roma survey 2021 – Questionnaire, Luxembourg, Publication office.
(https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra\_uploads/fra-2022-roma-survey-2021-questionnaire\_en\_0.pdf )
Study group: Surveys from European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), GESIS Community Data
Date(s) of Data Collection: 10.05.2019 - 21.04.2021
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7773 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14014
GESIS, Cologne. ZA7773 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14014
Abstract: The main objective of the ENTRA (Recent Immigration Processes and Early Integration Trajectories in Germany) Survey was to collect data on new immigrants in Germany that ... more
Abstract: The main objective of the ENTRA (Recent Immigration Processes and Early Integration Trajectories in Germany) Survey was to collect data on new immigrants in Germany that ... more
Content: I. Waves 1 and 2:
A. Demography: Migration Biography: date of leaving the country; date of arrival in Germany (year, month, day); lived in a refugee camp; respondent knew people in Germany before moving (from own country, from Germany or from other countries, did not know people in Germany); spent time in Germany before; first time in Germany (month and year); number of trips to Germany before moving; time spent in Germany before (in years and months); visited the country since moving/ wave 1; number of trips to the country since moving/ wave 1.
Migration motives: reasons for moving to Germany; family members the respondent joined.
Current Situation: future migration expectancies; intention to stay in Germany (in years).
Legal situation: residential status (temporary, permanent or no residence permit); kind of temporary residence permit; residence permit until year and month; work permit; applied for asylum in Germany; joined a family member whose asylum request has been accepted in Germany.
Relationship: marital status; in relationship; same partner as last survey; information on partner: age, country of origin; place of residence; year and month of arrival Germany; expect partner to move to Germany in the next twelve months.
Children: number of children; age of these children; place of residence of these children; expect children to move to Germany in the next twelve months; children six years or younger living in the household; use of public childcare (day nursery, Kindergarten, none of this).
Parents: place of birth of mother and father; place of residence; expect mother and father to move to Germany in the next twelve months.
People in household: size of household; number of household members related to the respondent by birth, marriage, partnership, or adoption; number of rooms in the household.
Relatives from the country: expect relatives to move to Germany in the next twelve months; number of relatives expected to move to Germany in the next twelve months; relatives moved to Germany since last survey; number of children that moved to Germany since last survey; number of relatives that moved to Germany since last survey; expect relatives to move to Germany in the next twelve months; expect own children, mother, father or other relatives to move to Germany in the next 12 months; number of children expected to move to Germany in the next twelve months; number of relatives expected to move to Germany in the next twelve months; schoolkids; plans on German citizenship application.
B. Language:
Speaking and understanding: country language proficiency (reading and writing); German language proficiency before moving; German language proficiency at present (understanding, speaking, reading, writing); German skills in everyday life (reading and understanding the main points in simple newspaper articles on familiar topics, speaking about familiar topics and expressing personal opinions in a conversation); learned German in school before moving to Germany; years of learning German before moving; actively tried to improve German language skills before moving; kind of investment in German language before moving (language classes, self-study, other); actively tried to improve German language skills since moving/ wave 1; investment in German language since moving/ wave 1 (integration course, language classes, self-study, other); participation in German language course or integration course; highest German language level certificate received; language certificate received for language since moving/ wave 1.
Language use: frequency of German language use with partner, children, friends and with others; frequency of German language use in media consumption.
English skills: speaking English for at least some degree; English language proficiency.
C: Identity and exclusion: belonging and experiences:
Identification and belonging: belonging to group; closeness to this group, to country people to members of own ethnic group, to inhabitants of the resident city, to Germans, to Europeans, to a religious group.
Feelings of acceptance and perceived discrimination: agreement with the following statements: in general, Germany is a welcoming country for country people, in general, country people can get ahead in Germany if they work hard; expectation to become truly German one day; importance to become truly German; rating of unfair treatment of country people in Germany; treated unfairly in Germany since moving/ wave 1; reasons for unfair treatment (born in a different country, strong accent, different religion, jobless, different cultures and traditions, foreign citizenship.
Satisfaction with migration decision and current situation:
connection felt with Germany; frequency of feeling like an outsider in Germany; rating of the current living situation compared with the living situation before leaving the country and compared to first survey; life satisfaction in Germany; how difficult/ easy is it to see a doctor in Germany, to search for a job in Germany.
Perceived compatibility of cultures and acculturation attitude:
Contact preferences for social activities; the values of Germans and country people are irreconcilable/ totally different; both the husband and wife should contribute to the household income; men should take as much responsibility as women for the home and children; On the whole, men make better political leaders than women do; when jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women; a university education is more important for a boy than for a girl; approvement if a woman wants to have a child as a single parent but no stable relationship with a man; a woman has to have children in order to be fulfilled.
Politics and attitudes about democracy:
Understanding of important political issues facing the country; interest in country politics; time spent on news about politics and current affairs in country (hours and minutes); frequency of political discussions about major political issues facing the country in the last twelve months; understanding of important political issues facing Germany; political interest in German politics; time spent on news about politics and current affairs in Germany (hours and minutes); frequency of political discussions about major political issues facing Germany in the last twelve months; political party which isn’t in the German Parliament; age when country people can vote in Germany (Syrians only); preferred political party in Germany; kind of political participation in Germany since last survey; kind of political participation in the country since last survey.
D: Religion and faith:
Religious belonging: Religious affiliation; religious affiliation in detail (Christians, Muslims, other).
Religious practices before migration: frequency of attending religious worship before moving to Germany; how often pray outside of communal prayers before migration; how often fast during Ramadan, Muharrem, Lenten season before migration; how often ware a headscarf before migration.
Religious practices after migration: frequency of religious worship; how many adults speak own native language in place of religious worship; religiosity; frequency of praying outside of communal prayers; frequency of praying outside of religious worship; fasted during last Ramadan, last Muharrem, last Lenten season; frequency of wearing a headscarf outside of home.
E: Social integration: friends and contacts:
Social integration: bonding and bridging ethnic ties: time spend with country people, with Germans and with other people (frequency); frequency of eating dinner with Germans who are not part of the family in the last twelve months; number of Germans contacted via phone, chat, or text in the last four weeks; number of people outside of Germany contacted via phone, messenger chat, or text; place of living of these contacted people outside of Germany.
Social Integration: Core Network – Strong Ties:
Number of people in Germany important personal matters are discussed with; number of these people who are originally from the country of origin; information on up to three persons: country of birth; country of origin of the family; country where the respondent first met the person; educational level; main activity; how did the respondent meet this person; relationship between the mentioned people: friends; frequency of contact with these persons; person helped with challenges in everyday life.
F: Education: learning and education:
Years of education (total); years of education in the country of origin; years of education in Germany.
Education in the country of origin: highest degree of education in Poland/ Italy/ Turkey/ Syria; continued education in the country of origin after completing this degree; type of school last attended; highest degree completed in Poland/ Italy/ Turkey/ Syria (ISCED 2011); education (ISCED 1997 und 2011; type of study program last attended; reason for leaving school without degree; month and year the respondent last attended school in the country; tried to get educational degree accepted by official German institution; educational degree accepted by official German institution.
Education since leaving the country: currently in education (no language classes or integration classes); type of school; type of study program; type of vocational school; plan to complete a degree in Germany; highest degree aiming for in Germany; plan to complete vocational training in Germany; educational degree completed in Germany; highest educational degree completed in Germany; completed degree in another country; highest degree completed in this other country.
Education Partner: Years of education; highest education degree; main activity.
G: Labor market: jobs and household:
Employment situation: main activity before moving to Germany; information on last job before moving: job position; number of employees (self-employed); job title (KldB2010, ISCED-08, EGP, ISEI-08, SIOPS-08); work hours; end of job (year and month).
Last job before move: job position; permanent or fixed-term employment contract; last job before moving: public sector;
Current employment situation: currently working; current main activity if not working; ever worked in Germany before moving to Germany; time worked in Germany before moving to Germany (years and months).
Current job in Germany: job position; first job since moving; ever worked in Germany since moving/ wave 1); end (year and month) of wave 1 job (if not worked since wave 1); last job since wave 1 same as in wave 1; employment contract; work hours; end of job (year and month).
Current Job wave 2 same as in wave 1; employment contract; work hours; number of jobs since moving/ wave 1; time worked in total since moving/ wave 1 (years and months); time worked in total in Germany (years and months).
Current job wave 1/ wave 2 is a new job: job position; employment contract; working in public sector; job position if self-employed; number of employees; job title (KldB2010, ISCED-08, EGP, ISEI-08, SIOPS-08); start of job (year and month); how did the respondent find the job; work hours.
Information on employment situation of partner.
Labor market: remittance: household net income; sent money to the country of origin since moving/ wave 1; sent money for personal savings, to family, to friends; received money from relatives or friends living in the country of origin since moving to Germany/wave 1.
H: Health: personality and well-being:
Health: resilience: I tend to bounce back quicky after hard times; it does not take me long to revocer from a stressful event; I often set a goal but later choose to pursue a different one, I have difficulty maintaining my focus on projects that take more than a few months to complete; I have been obsessed with a certain idea or project for a short time but later lost interest; I finish what ever I begin; I am diligent; I am a hard worker.
Health: self-rated health; loneliness and perceived social isolation: I experience a general sense von emptiness; there are many people I can trust completely; there are plenty of people I can rely on when I have problems; there are enough people I feel close to; I miss having people around; I often feel rejected.
Mental health: mental condition in the past twelve months: frequency of feeling nervous, hopeless, restless or fidgety, depressed, that everything was an effort, worthless; trauma: ever witnesses or feared a situation of serious violence (someone else, self); relative or friend died violently.
Reasons for leaving Germany; reasons why others recognize foreign roots; skin color (tone); relatives moved to Germany since last survey; religiosity; religious affiliation; religious affiliation in detail: Christians, Muslims, other); residence permit until month and year; resident status of sample population; residential status; residential status (detailed); same day as arrival, same partner as last survey.
Self-assed likelihood of problems in the next twelve months (children problems at school, drastically lowered standard of living, loose apartment, loose job, no longer support for relatives/ friends in the country of origin, payment difficulties).
Demography: sex; age; country of birth; country of growing up; citizenship; native language; region and province the respondent grew up (NUTS2-2016 Italy, NUTS3-2016 Italy, NUTS 2-2016 Poland, NUTS3-2016 Poland, region Syria (semi NUTS1, NUTS2-2016 Turkey, NUTS3-2016 Turkey); origin of partner.
II. COVID-19 survey
A: Basic and remigration: country of residence; remigration due to the coronavirus pandemic; plan to return to Germany when the situation allows; children who usually go to school.
B: COVID-19:
Hardship: likeliness of: lose job, run into payment difficulties, drastically lower standard of living, lose the apartment, won’t be able to support relatives or friends anymore, children will get problems at school; experiences like lost job or ran into payment difficulties are related to the coronavirus pandemic.
Burden: experience of the following during the coronavirus pandemic: problems finding/ understanding information about the coronavirus pandemic and behavioral guidelines, having COVID-19 symptoms, COVID-19 symptoms in family members or friends, being at increased risk for an infection, problems with access to healthcare, mediation, or sanitation, being unable to pursue private travel plans, feeling restricted to leave home, being unable to visit sick family members or friends, problems with childcare of home schooling, tensions at home or family conflict; rating how burdensome this was.
C: Social integration:
Social integration: Bonding and Bridging ethnic ties: daily life experiences under measures to combat the coronavirus: frequencies of spending time with people from the country, with Germans, and with people who are neither from the country nor from Germany; number of people outside of Germany the respondent has a conversation with; where to most of these people live.
D: Language:
Language use: frequency of speaking German with friends, with other people in everyday life; frequency of media consumption in German language.
Language: German skills: rating of German skills at present (understanding, speaking, reading, writing).
E: identity and exclusion:
Identity: voluntary activities during the coronavirus pandemic; received any help from volunteers.
Identification and belonging: closeness to the inhabitants of the city, to Germans, to country people, and to Europeans.
F: Religion:
Religious practices: religiosity; frequency of praying outside of communal prayers and outside of religious worship.
G: Labor market:
Changes in employment situation due to COVID19: current main activity; employment situation has changed due to the coronavirus pandemic (lost my job, quitted my job); concrete changes of the employment situation; change of working hours due to the coronavirus pandemic.
H: Health and personality:
Self-rated health; loneliness and perceived social isolation: general sense of emptiness; plenty people I can rely on when I have problems; many people I can trust completely; enough people I feel close to; I miss having people around; I often feel rejected.
Mental health: mental condition during the past month: frequency of feeling nervous, hopeless, restless or fidgety, depressed, that everything was an effort, worthless.
COVID-19 - affected: ever tested positive for the coronavirus; member of household or family ever tested positive for the coronavirus; household member or family member with a positive test.
Demography: sex; age; household size.
Additionally coded were: respondent ID; interviewer ID; wave; group country of origin; mode of interview; recruitment batch (wave 1); date of interview; date and time of interview; interview duration; other people present while survey; interference of others during the interview; participation in wave 2; percentage of Balkan households, of Eastern European households, of ethnic German resettlers households, of German households, of Greek households, Hispanic, Portuguese/ Latino households, at municipality level, postcode level, and postcode8 level; percentage of households with a Hauptschulabschluss, with a Realschulabschluss, with Abitur, with Fachhochschulabschluss, with no/ other school qualification , at municipality level, postcode level, and postcode8 level; percentage of Italian household, of non-European Islamic households, of other country-specific households, of South/East/Southeast Asian households, of sub-Saharan African households, of Turkish households, at different municipality level, postcode level, and postcode8 level); percentage of unemployment at municipality level, postcode level, and postcode8 level; percentage of foreigners at municipality level, postcode level, postcode8 level, and at street segment level; socio-economic status distribution at municipality level, postcode level, postcode8 level, and at street segment level; family structures at street segment level (ordinal); time to complete the interview; duration of stay (months); resident status of sample population; immigration date: month and year of leaving the country; same day as arrival; land, house, or apartment in the country of origin; owner or investor of store or business in the country; gave money for collective projects in the country;
knowledge of other people who participated in the survey; number of household members that also participated in the survey; Digit-Symbol-Test – correct items (score); Digit-Symbol-Test – No. of items processed.
Topics: Migration, EDUCATION, Compulsory and pre-school education, Vocational education and training, HEALTH, General health and well-being, Employment, Working conditions, Language and linguistics, Political behaviour and attitudes, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Family life and marriage, Minorities, Cultural and national identity, Religion and values, Social behaviour and attitudes, Social conditions and indicators
Date(s) of Data Collection: 10.05.2019 - 21.04.2021
Date(s) of Data Collection: 10.05.2019 - 31.10.2019, wave 1, 11.05.2020 - 22.06.2020, COVID-19 survey, 20.11.2020 - 21.04.2021, wave 2
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: Immigrants from Italy, Poland, Syria, and Turkey who were between 18 and 40 years old (18 to 41 at the time of the first interview) and had the nationality of the respective country of origin and no German citizenship.
Number of Units: 10420
Sampling Procedure: • Non-probability: Purposive
• Probability: Simple random;
Temporal Research Design: Longitudinal: Panel
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Face-to-face interview: Computer-assisted (CAPI/CAMI)
• Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)
• Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
Data Collector: ENTRA-Team (online surveys (CAWI) and the face-to-face interviews (CAPI));
Bamberg Center for Empirical Studies (BACES), Bamberg (telephone interviews (CATI))
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 780
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Diehl, Claudia - Universität Konstanz, Koenig, Matthias - Universität Göttingen, Kristen, Cornelia - Universität Bamberg
Publication year: 2024
DOI: 10.4232/1.14014
Study number: ZA7773
Publisher: GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2024-01-01, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14014
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2024-01-01 first archive edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14014 |
Publications: Seuring, Julian; Degen, Daniel; Rüdel, Julia; Ries, Felix; Diehl, Claudia; Kristen, Cornelia and Matthias Koenig (2023):
The ENTRA Survey : Recent Immigration Processes and Early Integration Trajectories in Germany. Methodological Report.
Study group: GESIS Community Data
Linked
information:Publications (2)
information:Publications (2)
Westle, Bettina; Auspurg, Katrin; Bühler, ChristophHadjar, Andreas; Hillmert, Steffen; Rosar, Ulrich; Wagner, Ulrich
Date(s) of Data Collection: 06.2021 - 08.2021
GESIS, Cologne. ZA5281 Data file Version 1.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14239
GESIS, Cologne. ZA5281 Data file Version 1.0.1, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14239
Abstract: ALLBUScompact is offered as an alternative to the structurally more
complex full version of ALLBUS. It addresses the needs of newcomers to
data analysis by providing a si ... more
Abstract: ALLBUScompact is offered as an alternative to the structurally more
complex full version of ALLBUS. It addresses the needs of newcomers to
data analysis by providing a si ... more
Topics: Media, Information society, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Minorities, Gender and gender roles, Religion and values, Political behaviour and attitudes, Crime and law enforcement, HEALTH
Date(s) of Data Collection: 06.2021 - 08.2021
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: All persons (German and non-German) who resided in private households and were born before 1 January 2003.
Number of Units: 5342
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Stratified: Disproportional
• Probability: Multistage;
Two stage disproportionate random sample in western Germany (incl. West Berlin) and eastern Germany (incl. East Berlin). In the first sample stage municipalities (Gemeinden) in western Germany and municipalities in eastern Germany were selected with a probability proportional to their number of adult residents; in the second sample stage individual persons were selected at random from the municipal registers of residents.
Targeted individuals who did not have adequate knowledge of German to conduct the interview were treated as systematic unit non-responses.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
• Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 was conducted as a mixed-mode survey. The target persons had the choice between the two modes MAIL and CAWI. Different survey modes are preferred by different subpopulations, as was the case in ALLBUS/GGSS 2021. To account for this self-selection, it is strongly recommended that the cases from both modes be analyzed together.
Data Collector: Kantar Public, Munich
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 395
Notes: Respondents from the area of the new federal states are oversampled.
Due to the Corona pandemic, ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 was conducted for the first time in a self-administered mixed-mode design. Respondents had the choice between filling in a paper questionnaire and mailing it back to the data collector (mode MAIL) or answering an online version of the same questionnaire (Computer-Assisted Web Interview, mode CAWI). Because of the mode change, differences between ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 and the data of previous surveys can be due to either temporal change or the change in survey mode. Therefore, users who use ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 data for time-comparison analyses should frame their statements about time-comparison results carefully.
Additional information on ALLBUS is available at: http://www.gesis.org/en/allbus
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Westle, Bettina - Universität Marburg, Auspurg, Katrin - LMU München, Bühler, Christoph - Universität Hannover, Hadjar, Andreas - Universität Luxemburg, Hillmert, Steffen - Universität Tübingen, Rosar, Ulrich - Universität Düsseldorf, Wagner, Ulrich - Universität Marburg
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.4232/1.14239, 10.4232/1.14004
Study number: ZA5281
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ ALLBUS bei GESIS
Current Version: 1.0.1, 2023-12-13, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14239
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.1 | 2023-12-13 Corrects errata in v1.0.0 (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14239 |
| 1.0.0 | 2022-09-21 first archive edition https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14004 |
Study group: ALLBUS
Linked
information:Publications (1)
information:Publications (1)
Westle, Bettina; Auspurg, Katrin; Bühler, ChristophHadjar, Andreas; Hillmert, Steffen; Rosar, Ulrich; Wagner, Ulrich
Date(s) of Data Collection: 06.2021 - 08.2021
GESIS, Cologne. ZA5283 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14213
GESIS, Cologne. ZA5283 Data file Version 1.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14213
Abstract: ALLBUScompact is offered as an alternative to the structurally more
complex full version of ALLBUS. It addresses the needs of newcomers to
data analysis by providing a si ... more
Abstract: ALLBUScompact is offered as an alternative to the structurally more
complex full version of ALLBUS. It addresses the needs of newcomers to
data analysis by providing a si ... more
Content: Topics:
1.) Use of media: Frequency and average total time of watching tv, frequency of watching news programs on public and commercial tv, frequency of reading a daily newspaper per week, frequency of reading books / e-books; internet use: frequency and type of device, frequency of using social media for political information, trustworthiness of different news sources with regard to crime and public safety.
2.) Social Inequality: Self-assessment of social class, fair share in standard of living, assessment of access to education, attitudes towards social inequality and the welfare state.
3.) Ethnocentrism and minorities: Attitude towards the influx of various groups of immigrants, attitudes towards the foreigners living in Germany, contacts with foreigners, antisemitic stereotypes and prejudices, attitudes towards Islam (Islamophobia), perceived risks and chances with respect to refugees.
4.) Family and gender roles: Attitudes towards working fathers and mothers, division of labor regarding house and family work., importance of educational goals.
5.) Values: Work orientations, attitudes towards legalizing abortion, materialism / postmaterialism (importance of law and order, fighting rising prices, free expression of opinions and influence on governmental decisions).
6.) Political attitudes: Pride in being a German, confidence in public institutions and organizations (public health service, federal constitutional court, federal parliament (Bundestag), city or municipal administration, churches, judiciary, television, newspapers, universities, federal government, the police, political parties, European Commission, European Parliament); identification with own community, the Federal Republic of Germany and the EU, preference for lower taxes or more social spending, stance on extension or reduction in social services, perceived strength of conflicts between social groups, political interest, self-placement on left-right continuum, satisfaction with democracy in Germany, voting intention (Sonntagsfrage).
7.) Deviant behavior and sanctions: Assessment of adequacy of court decisions, development of crime rate, moral assessment of deviant acts, crime-specific desire for sanctions (punitivity), desire to prohibit specific behaviors, attitude towards the death penalty, self-reported deviant behavior (past and future), perceived risk of being caught committing various crimes, victimisation (theft, any crime), respect of the law (norm), deterring crime through punishment, purpose of punishment, self-control (Grasmick), fear of crime, feeling of safety in living environment.
8.) Health: Self-assessment of overall health, physical and mental health during the last four weeks, acceptance of state powers to control epidemics.
9.) Religion: Self-assessment of religiousness, denomination, frequency of church attendance / attending a house of God.
10.) Other topics: Assessment of the present and future economic situation in Germany, assessment of present and future personal economic situation, social pessimism and orientation towards the future (anomia), interpersonal trust, reciprocity, authoritarianism, overall life satisfaction.
11.) ALLBUS-Demography:
Details about the respondent: age, gender, marital status, citizenship (nationality), school education, vocational training, employment status, affiliation to public service, working hours per week (primary and secondary job), supervisory functions, fear of unemployment, length of unemployment, status of non-employment, date of termination of full-time employment, current or former membership in a trade union, membership in a political party, respondent´s income.
Place of residence (self-description, size of municipality), duration of residence (in Germany and at current place of residence), distance to previous place of residence, mobility.
Details about respondent´s current spouse: age, school education, vocational training, employment status, affiliation to public service, status of non-employment.
Details about respondent´s steady partner: age, school education, vocational training, employment status, affiliation to public service, status of non-employment, common household with respondent.
Details about respondent´s parents: cohabitation with respondent as adolescent, school education of mother and father, vocational training of mother and father.
Description of household: size of household, household income, number of persons older than 17 in household (reduced size of household).
12.) Data on the interview (paradata) : Study number, digital object identifier, release, respondent id, mode of data collection.
13.) Added value: Inglehart-Index, Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale (SIOPS, according to Ganzeboom), International Socio-economic Index of Occupational Status (ISEI, according to Ganzeboom), European Socio-Economic Groups (ESeG), International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 1997 and 2011, living arrangement and family situation, transformation weight for analyses on household level, east-west design weight.
Topics: Media, Information society, Equality, inequality and social exclusion, Minorities, Gender and gender roles, Religion and values, Political behaviour and attitudes, Crime and law enforcement, HEALTH
Date(s) of Data Collection: 06.2021 - 08.2021
Geographic coverage: Germany (DE)
Universe: All persons (German and non-German) who resided in private households and were born before 1 January 2003.
Number of Units: 5342
Sampling Procedure: • Probability: Stratified: Disproportional
• Probability: Multistage;
Two stage disproportionate random sample in western Germany (incl. West Berlin) and eastern Germany (incl. East Berlin). In the first sample stage municipalities (Gemeinden) in western Germany and municipalities in eastern Germany were selected with a probability proportional to their number of adult residents; in the second sample stage individual persons were selected at random from the municipal registers of residents.
Targeted individuals who did not have adequate knowledge of German to conduct the interview were treated as systematic unit non-responses.
Temporal Research Design: Cross-section
Analysis Unit: Individual
Mode of Data Collection: • Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
• Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI);
ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 was conducted as a mixed-mode survey. The target persons had the choice between the two modes MAIL and CAWI. Different survey modes are preferred by different subpopulations, as was the case in ALLBUS/GGSS 2021. To account for this self-selection, it is strongly recommended that the cases from both modes be analyzed together.
Data Collector: Kantar Public, Munich
Analysis System(s): SPSS, Stata
Kind of Data: Numeric
Number of Variables: 395
Notes: Respondents from the area of the new federal states are oversampled.
Due to the Corona pandemic, ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 was conducted for the first time in a self-administered mixed-mode design. Respondents had the choice between filling in a paper questionnaire and mailing it back to the data collector (mode MAIL) or answering an online version of the same questionnaire (Computer-Assisted Web Interview, mode CAWI). Because of the mode change, differences between ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 and the data of previous surveys can be due to either temporal change or the change in survey mode. Therefore, users who use ALLBUS/GGSS 2021 data for time-comparison analyses should frame their statements about time-comparison results carefully.
Additional information on ALLBUS is available at: http://www.gesis.org/en/allbus
Principal Investigator/ Authoring Entity, Institution: Westle, Bettina - Universität Marburg, Auspurg, Katrin - LMU München, Bühler, Christoph - Universität Hannover, Hadjar, Andreas - Universität Luxemburg, Hillmert, Steffen - Universität Tübingen, Rosar, Ulrich - Universität Düsseldorf, Wagner, Ulrich - Universität Marburg
Publication year: 2023
DOI: 10.4232/1.14213
Study number: ZA5283
Publisher: GESIS
Research data center: FDZ ALLBUS bei GESIS
External links: ALLBUS/GGSS 2021, complete data set (scientific use file), ALLBUS 2021, complete data set (scientific use file)
Current Version: 1.0.0, 2023-11-03, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14213
Version history:
| Version number | Date, Name, DOI |
|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2023-11-03 First Edition (current version) https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14213 |
Study group: ALLBUS
